Posts from Forum
But as long as players form the prize pool from their own contributions, they also determine the rules of the game. It's no coincidence that most tournaments have a rule: "players can, by mutual agreement, change the rules of the game." In the cases described, there was an extended interpretation of this rule.
For example, in the tournament organized by Nagan, he was the sponsor, so he had the right to change the regulations during the tournament (within reasonable limits). And since the players didn't object, it means that his actions were within reasonable limits. In his place, I would have acted exactly the same.
However, while players contribute to the prize pool from their own funds, they also determine the rules of the game. That's why most tournaments have a rule stating that "players can mutually agree to change the rules of the game." In the cases described, there was an extended interpretation of this rule.
For example, in the tournament organized by Nagan, he was the sponsor, so he had the right to change the regulations during the tournament (within reasonable limits). And since the players didn't object, it means that his actions were within reasonable limits. In his place, I would have acted the same way.
You can, of course, continue to write another lengthy post with a smart look... but in such situations, they started to explicitly state that you can't dry a cat in the microwave...
P.S. I'm honestly getting tired of this topic about the CIS region, and no matter what they write or try to twist, everyone has already drawn their own conclusions, and there's nothing left to discuss.
Стримы и обучение тут:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWlnXU5R5RLCMuWzIpBc65Q
Where exactly is the nonsense in Vic's words? If documented facts are nonsense, then what is normal reality?
Well, Vic simply sees an agreement, which occurred either in a struggle, or it was a draw and people didn't want to play for long, or they got drunk and it didn't work out, or something else where there was no result, and he also brings in your game where Redwhite beat you and the result should have been in the table, but you know what happened next. Do you feel the difference?
In short, he's twisting things again, and trying to mislead and confuse people, it's a common theme...
Where exactly in Vik's words is the nonsense? If documented facts are nonsense, then what is normal reality?
I'll disappoint you, but many good players, with whom you generally communicate normally and who directly tell you that you are wrong, all these people consider your award to be a sham, and so do I. You can only win a tournament in one way: you sit down, play everything yourself, and get your result. And if you play well and are lucky with the draws, then you have a good result, and if this result is also in a tournament with a lot of strong players, then respect is doubled. This is, of course, my vision of normal reality; you may have your own reality, and there is nothing to argue about here. But your reality concerns not only you but also other players who also contributed money to the prize pool, who played, and if they were not lucky, then they honestly lost.
You probably didn't read the rules to the end:
Fair play
The most important point: players must play fairly and respect each other.
This situation is absurd in every way, that they allowed such a result... that they gave you an award on the forum... I can bet that if Pete had been on the forum at that time, such an injustice would not have happened... but with the current state of affairs, such mistakes happen... and the Creator doesn't care; he was told, and he gave the award...
In conclusion, this victory is unfair; these actions can also be equated to the actions of all cheaters who violated 1) the rule of fair play and 2) deceived other players... I see no difference. All those who try to justify it are like people with a cat in the microwave. For whom they forgot to write that you can't do this...
I think that in the next CIS tournament, few people will want to play with Lizard, or this opinion will remain with them... But Kostya has one way to fix everything (and, as I see it, it is the last, because a person's reputation hangs by a thread due to such actions)... - this is to apologize to those who played there, remove this fake award, and win it next time in a fair fight. And get real emotions of joy from the victory instead of a bunch of negativity.
Стримы и обучение тут:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWlnXU5R5RLCMuWzIpBc65Q
What I mean is that the situation with match-fixing is somewhat similar to the situation with corruption – those with the dirtiest secrets are the loudest in their accusations, and if they don't have any, it's only because they haven't had the opportunity.
Many like to refer to professional sports, but any of the episodes I described would lead to the disqualification of both players.
Therefore, there's no need to pretend to be Mother Teresa, but rather acknowledge that Heroes has its own specific characteristics, and if there's a desire to change these characteristics, it should be done through regulations, not through personal interpretations. Because, according to those interpretations, Lizard's and Redi's actions are perfectly acceptable within the norms of tournament practice in Heroes.
At the next CIS tournament, someone might come with a Kalashnikov and shoot all the participants, declaring themselves the champion, because it's not written anywhere that you can't eliminate everyone...
Стримы и обучение тут:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWlnXU5R5RLCMuWzIpBc65Q
Added 18 minutes later
I think all this mess is still related to one simple thing - the phrase "CIS Champion" sounds too good. Probably, any hero would like to claim this title. But for me, it's just a stimulus to win the next CIS tournament.
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
Wow, they already deleted the post in the forum. Have you all gone completely crazy? I thought Romantic was the one doing it, but I was surprised to see "Wicc" under the message. The main "democrat and opposition" member, having gotten to the green nickname, started acting like Uncle Vova. Everything that is unacceptable (in his opinion, of course) is being deleted and banned. What a joke. The crown grew quickly on his head. Why didn't you delete Nagan's post, since it was under the same banner?
Personally, I could have deleted nothing, but since they started waving the saber, let it be consistent.
Come on, Lizardo didn't become a champion because of cheating, but because of bribery)
And he didn't bribe me or some other nobody, but a pretty well-known guy (and an adult man, judging by your photos in real life).
So, you need to punish those who took the bribe)
There's demand - there's supply)
And he generally made his name in history (like Yanukovich) and it doesn't matter what methods he used. You allowed it, and if you're not caught, you're not a thief
P.S. What are the prices for CIS 2017?
admin, be a good guy, don't delete this.
I suggest that the admins from now on delete (+/- give penalty points for) posts on this issue, starting with Nagan's post. Thank you.

