Posts from Forum

Let me start by saying that I am writing this without any one of my nerves frayed, having calmly and rationally analyzed and weighed the situation. At this moment, four players who are quite strong and respected in the heroes world have more than once and unambiguously described to me game situations in matches with Vitaliy, where extremely dubious and illogical actions on the opponent's part were evident, which, strangely enough, led the latter to victory. This especially concerns games for stakes. These players (I will not name names or nicknames for now) naturally stopped playing with Vitaliy.

Moving on to a specific game. For the second time in my conscious life (5+ years ago, when everyone was learning how to play, doesn't count), I decided to check the game saves. The first time was after a game with Num in a CIS satellite tournament. So. Having a significant economic advantage and starting on turn 121 from the computer's Castle via fast roads, I bought up as much as possible and took a console (3) along the way, then went to rush the opponent. It was a very long run, so I only reached Vitaliy's zone on turn 125. What does Vitaliy do between turns 124-127? Risking being left without castles (which is exactly what happened by day 1), he doesn't follow the road to the corner village, but instead pushes through the wilderness toward the only available Dragon Utopia. Moreover, he has no land view—though I have doubts that he even knows how to use this spell to determine the location of Dragon Utopias with high probability, but that's not the point. The point is that even in a 2-player game, with Gunnar's army and stats, he would have been beaten ownly. However, by some miracle, this single Dragon Utopia turns out to be a level 1 with an air book. Any artifact other than a cap or КВ would have forced one to type "гг" on the spot. Furthermore, seeing how clearly I was rushing the opponent's capital without hesitating at forks, even a non-top player would understand that I have the exp for land view. Consequently, I know the location of all heroes. Gunnar (again, instead of fleeing along the road toward the village to seek far more logical luck) remains "within striking distance" of Kreg for two days in a row, calculating that I will mistake him for some resource-gathering loser. Naturally, that's what happened—I did. How was I, a horse, supposed to know that Gunnar specifically ran into the bushes to pick up another console, since otherwise you can't even take a level 1 Dragon Utopia (which at that moment no one had seen yet, or had they??). After the match ended, Vitaliy mockingly writes to me "did you really go rush Gunnar with Kreg without any logic?", after which I decided to check the saves. Based on the analysis, I have put Vitaliy in ignore.

Once again, there is no evidence sufficient for a direct accusation. That's how it is with us: if you aren't caught, you aren't a thief; that's why the best thieves are in power. I am a maximally open and easygoing person. I bought the game on CIS—I didn't try to hide it, I told everyone—yes, I bought it, the rules didn't forbid it. I got a mountain of feces-covered stones thrown in my face, and I talked to everyone, listened to all opinions; everyone is right in their own way. For me, the actual game of heroes as a sport is far more important, especially in head-to-head matches with the strongest players.

From my point of view, player Gomunguls plays:

1. Straightforwardly, with a complete absence of complex strategic decisions
2. Often illogically, finding saving perks in the dark.

I don't believe in such luck, or if you prefer, such intuition—I don't believe it one bit.

From now on, should I be matched against this player in tournaments, I ask that you give me an autolose. That is all from me, thank you all for your attention.

GoD owes me 7000 rubles.

Can I ask a question? How can a player who bribes players from the CIS region to win now log in and justify his losses by blaming Vitaly's "cheating," who streams the game, unlike him? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Now he's justifying his lack of understanding of the game by blaming cheating. And I'll name the players for you: FTS, Lutski, and Helllight.

Ask more questions and talk more. You've never discussed the game with a lizard...

I urge everyone who owes money to Gomunguls not to pay them under any circumstances.

But your opinion is pretty much the same. You weren't shy about talking about it on your streams.

What difference does it make what my opinion is? Are you the main advocate here? And if we're talking about it, I only mentioned on streams the strange, and frankly very strange, intensity of Goma's use of Boots and Logistics from the first week, in almost all the games I checked out.

By the way, this isn't the first statement regarding Evgeny. Many have complained to me about this, and the amounts are not small. Yes, there can be different financial situations, and a crisis, but you need to assess your capabilities and bankroll. Therefore, I advise everyone to make it a habit to calculate after each game (fortunately, in our time, everyone knows how to use online transfers), or agree to play up to a certain amount (for example, 5000), and also agree in advance on the payment deadlines. Be careful with financial matters, because, as they say, "A debt should be paid," and it's easy to damage your reputation, but it will be difficult to restore it, especially in financial matters.

They were also laughing about this, along with Diabler and Grizwald. Why weren't they mentioned?

Maybe because they don't play for stakes?

And there's a war going on in Ukraine... That's about as relevant as your last post!..)

If you don't understand the logic, then don't write anything at all. Especially nonsense. It's obvious that the players who lost money to Gomunguls are the most suspicious. But you keep going. Show off your "best" qualities.