Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Name: Stormy Donbass Map name: Donbass Two-level map: yes Number of players: 1+3 Size: XL Difficulty level: chosen by the player (default - Normal) Map author: melanipp Map description: 1st (simplified) version (without the participation of NATO troops), 1 player against 3 AI opponents.
At least they could have filled the map with forests and mines, and considered what they were doing when creating it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0JfNHcWZkA&feature=youtu.be&t=58m20s Napoleon probably wouldn't have liked "...Moscow, burned by fire" that's why he fled, a miserable commander, an aesthete :D "Here, the birds don't sing, the trees don't grow. And only we, shoulder to shoulder, grow into the earth here" I wonder, did Marshal Zhukov have a beautiful map, or not?
this isn't the "Tretyakov Gallery"! Maps are not created to be admired, but to be played! in terms of practicality, do you need these mines and forests??? in my opinion, I haven't deprived anyone of resources for Donbass, the mines are located where humanitarian aid comes from. and in order for this aid to reach its destination, as they say, "the border needs to be blurred". everything is logical here.
I disagree. The first thing that catches the eye is how the map is designed, and only then the gameplay.
That's true. Arctic snow in the south of Russia and southern Europe doesn't make you want to go there. And the lifeless, rocky-sandy terrain in the rest of the area also doesn't make you want to conquer and develop it – you won't get any experience, and you won't get any resources... What's the point of fighting? In that case, it's better to put all this into the "S" key to avoid wasting time on empty crossings, but definitely not in the "HL". However, the description of the events is good, it's just a shame that it's too short.
I agree that the map was created “in a hurry.” After all, I can’t spend my whole life drawing just one map; I have other plans. As for experience, it is gained in battle. And you need to capture not snow, but cities (they are even too close to each other on Hard difficulty). The obstacles were created specifically so that the computer would fight, and not travel to other lands. After all, the war is taking place in the Donbas region, and not in southern Europe. (Southern Europe is “reserved” for NATO bases).
I wonder what a lighter version with NATO troops would look like.
I'm afraid of jinxing it :smile24: but it's not hard to guess: three naval bases on the Black Sea, and lots and lots of snow :D and what, can't they manage without NATO?