Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
They gave him half a year. It's harsh, but on the other hand, Vatya might realize that cheating and then trying to whitewash himself is a low thing to do. It looks childish for a 33-year-old (if his profile is to be believed). Here's the theory: they passed the turn to me without asking, and I'm always the good guy, offering everything to everyone (you're great, but it's your personal choice, it's a matter of good manners! Not everyone has that kind of upbringing, you have to accept it), so I'll get revenge by joining the stream (and have an excuse for myself, in case there are no more chances to play).
In short: all he had to do was write to him on ICQ asking him to upload, or, if he got a negative answer (JUST IN CASE), contact the judges or post on the forum!
As you know, miracles happen before the New Year, and I want to give the forum another gift. User ColdRain, also known as Ariputra, is retiring. Happy New Year to everyone!
There are too many moderators on the forum. Who is so generous with moderator privileges? I'll book one set.
Roman has been appointed moderator specifically for the Tribune section. I don't like reading it, and I can easily find other things to do on the forum, and Kostya is already overloaded with general administration. The other moderators don't show any activity or interest in the arguments.LeBron
by the way, what prevents us from legislating the issue of streams and broadcasts? It has been discussed and raised so many times... A question for the ace-king :)
Now, I think nothing prevents us. A year ago, my proposals didn't find support. Now the situation has changed, and there is enough material, it's time to create a legislative framework. Enot571 will take care of it in his spare time.
As you know, miracles happen before the New Year, and I want to give the forum another gift. User ColdRain aka Ariputra is retiring. Happy New Year to everyone!!!!
Good job, Kostya :) And how did you expose him? He held out for a long time; he even managed to play in tournaments.
I also want to give the forum a gift with another exposé. I'm also a clone of Ariputra. Just kidding, I'm actually Iron Man. Happy New Year ;-)
The year is coming to an end, and I won't have the opportunity to be online for the next few days, so let's summarize the intermediate results of the qualification.
Let's start with the good news: the games are progressing well, many have already played the first round, and some even the second! If you have an opponent for the third round, you can start playing, but don't forget that the series goes to two wins! If anyone has a problem with arranging a game, it's best to let me or the tournament judges know.
Submissions for the future tournament cup are starting to arrive; there aren't many, but they are of good quality. I hope this flow of submissions doesn't stop.
Unfortunately, there's also some bad news. Everyone knows that we have many game rules, and sometimes, in the heat of the moment or due to inattention, we break them. But there is one rule that everything depends on – the rule of fair play. One of the tournament participants, unfortunately, violated it, first claiming one thing and then, the next day, something else. To briefly describe the situation, Slayzer was streaming his game against Vatya. At one point, one of the viewers pointed out that Vatya was on a stream. When Slayzer started looking through the viewers list, he did indeed find his opponent in the match. A few moments later, Vatya left the stream. I had a conversation with both players. Vatya told me that he accidentally ended up on the stream, clicked on the wrong thing, and immediately closed it. We then had a 20-minute conversation where Vatya talked about his strong feelings against watching other people's streams and mentioned people who could vouch for him. Overall, I became convinced that it was most likely a misunderstanding. But I was very surprised when I read the following:
As a result, Vatya won this match.
In light of the above, in the match between Vatya and Slayzer, Vatya receives a technical defeat and is disqualified from the tournament by unanimous decision of the organizer and the tournament judges. Vatya's further fate will be known after the decision of the AC (Arbitration Committee).
I just want to add that the more such cases there are, the fewer streamers will want to broadcast interesting (important) games. I think it's clear who will benefit and who will lose from this. Besides, what pleasure is there in a victory obtained in this way, and is it even worth anything to such winners?
User favio was banned at his own request; in the match between Diabler and favio, Diabler receives a technical victory. I'll leave this without comment; it's a pity that it turned out this way.
Finally, to end on a positive note.
Congratulations to everyone on the upcoming 2014! I wish you to never stop, always achieve your goals, and may everyone find their Arch in the Refuge in the new year :smile02:
I had some computer problems, and for the New Year, I gave myself a gift – now I can stream again. I've been waiting for this for half a year, to be honest – I'm reading this with tears in my eyes. Gentlemen, keep yourselves in check; we're all here to have fun – don't deprive yourselves and others of it. Happy New Year to everyone!
In short, here's the situation: Slayzer was streaming his game against Vatya, and at some point, one of the viewers pointed out that Vatya was also streaming. When Slayzer started looking through the viewer list, he actually found his opponent from the match. A few moments after that, Vatya left the stream.
That viewer was me. I joined the stream and saw Vatya's nickname in the viewer list. A couple of minutes later, I wrote to Slayzer: "lol Vatya is in the chat," after which the latter immediately left the stream. I took a screenshot using "screnny.ru," copied the link address, and accidentally overwrote the clipboard with the next copy, and it can't be restored on Windows 7. Sorry for the off-topic.
Стрим это понты. Cтримишь, знай что твой стрим смотрят, точнее ты стримишь, чтобы смотрели, они и смотрят. Или стримы нельзя смотреть? (c) Chinqis
I'm skeptical about mean and embittered women, but here they completely blew my mind http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utVLescQI8s&sns=fb, and at the same time, it increased my appreciation for our culture.
I'm skeptical about mean and embittered women, but here they completely blew my mind http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utVLescQI8s&sns=fb, and at the same time, it increased my appreciation for our culture.
I watched the whole hour and a half. Let's go to Europe.
It made my morning. I suspected something was wrong when I saw the logo of "Poznovatelnoe TV" in the corner. They are known for all sorts of dubious content. I watched almost the whole thing, and yes, it's mind-blowing. But after doing a little research, everything fell into place. In short, it's pure nonsense. One https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6ogsOwaNk8 Two https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wUdB9Yf06k4 The first video comments on her general statements about Norway, and the second focuses more on her specific situation and pedophilia.
Yes, it’s clear that all the negativity that a person has accumulated was poured out in a 1.5-hour video. It wasn’t beneficial to talk about the positive aspects, which are undoubtedly there. Having personal experience communicating with such individuals, I initially approach their confessions with suspicion. But if “it’s at least a third true”....
2Sanin, after watching some YouTube videos, I see the situation like this: the woman planned to obtain citizenship, then get some money from her husband, and live happily and comfortably for the rest of her life. She miscalculated a bit – the norms and laws turned against her, and she became a victim instead of a predator.
I don't want to delve into who is lying and who isn't, and there's no need to, but some points still convince me that the woman isn't lying in some places. For example, her son's story (if he is really her son) – the guy left there of his own free will. I don't think a child would run away from good foster parents to a bad biological parent across two borders. The fact that children are forbidden to communicate with their ancestors, and that the child is not asked whether they want to be with one of the parents, also seems abnormal to me.
Furthermore, education. I don't know about Europe, but I have relatives in the United States who managed to study in their schools. In short, it's a global dumbing down. Most children really don't even know how to read or count to 1000 by the end of school. Then there's the promotion of homosexuality. This cannot be denied either. Someone might argue with foam at the mouth that a child raised in a family consisting of two men will be mentally normal... BUT IT'S NOT NORMAL!!! I know from my own child about the "positive" influence of Western culture. When my 8-year-old daughter tells me what the boys her age say to her, I get goosebumps. And if children are also taught from an early age that a family of two men is good, it's scary to imagine what they will become.