Posts from The Hunger Games

Captain/Uruk-hai any chance of playing tonight?

Captain/Uruk-hai any chance of playing tonight?

Uruk-hai said that he will dont continiue.
I was yesterday evening online, nobody knock to me.
Judge set the time to play, hellight cant play in that time, so we with you go in next round i hope.

or you will be disqualified for deliberately providing false information; you haven't been online on ICQ since the save. And I've already put in enough effort for this match to write you anything more.

On the 10th, I'll prepare the popcorn at 11 PM and wait for those losers on the 11th at midnight to 1 AM, and we'll drag out a bunch of games like that.

rebellious (blue, random, Inferno, Khalid, Raksha), marader-kisa (brown, random, swamp, Gervulf, Labeta) def Chemist_HP (red, random, dungeon, Gunnar, Gunnar), Huanito (green, random, dungeon, Jeddita, Shakti) JC 134
We decided to play without random castles.
In the first week, I took a weak Viv, defended against 2 harpies, each with 2 angels. + a book of fire.
123 moved to the center and immediately drove out the green player.
126 killed the red player.
134 The green player, cornered, surrenders.
Thanks to everyone for the game.

rebellious (blue, random, Inferno, Kalid, Rasha), marader-kisa (brown, random, Swamp, Gervulf, Labeta) def Chemist_HP (red, random, Dungeon, Gunnar, Gunnar), Huanito (green, random, Dungeon, Jeddita, Shakti) JC 134

The game turned out to be fun. I had just breached one Guardian Object from the Dragon Cave and grabbed the Boots of Speed — and everyone already surrendered. So I didn't even get to fight anyone :smile04:
But at home I had an external dwelling of Efreeti, 4 Dragon Fly Hives for 20 Wyverns, a maxed-out Griffin Conservatory, and 3 Dragon Utopias (2 level 3 ones), with the Elixir assembled.
Thanks for the game

Message from marader-kisa
rebellious (blue, random, Inferno, Khalid, Rakshasa), marader-kisa (brown, random, swamp, Gervulf, Labeta) def Chemist_HP (red, random, Dungeon, Gunnar, Gunnar), Huanito (green, random, Dungeon, Jeddita, Shakti) JC 134

Confirm. Thx for game.

rebellious (blue, random, Inferno, Khalid, Raksha), marader-kisa (brown, random, swamp, Gervulf, Labeta) def Chemist_HP (red, random, Dungeon, Gunnar, Gunnar), Huanito (green, random, Dungeon, Jeddita, Shakti) JC 134

It happened. There were a few fighters, two portals. 3 angels and in the center. There was a teapot and another portal. But Labeta got Armageddon and 3 golden dragons from the Pandora box. No chance.

Thanks for the game!

If one of the four players starts intentionally playing against the rules, stealing artifacts from under guard and giving them to an "ally," or using Armageddon against other opponents, they will, of course, lose. But what should be done about the game? :) Will their "ally" proceed further, deservedly or not?

Both players will be disqualified, as it is highly likely (99%) that the ally was aware of this.

most likely, it's hard to prove anyway))) well, maybe one of the players had a moment of confusion and forgot the rules.

You're acting like a little kid; for this, they could not only disqualify you but also ban you, and disqualify the other player. It's like driving drunk – the police stop you, and you tell them, "Guys, I didn't know you weren't allowed to drink," and expect them to "understand and forgive."

You've completely mixed up the concepts here. "Ignorance of the law is no excuse" is irrelevant here. The point is that it's impossible to prove that the second player, who ends up winning, knew about their ally's violations. They can simply say, "I don't know anything about it," and claim that the second player acted independently and wasn't warned. Furthermore, in the format of this tournament, alliances are conditional, and proving their existence is also problematic – Player A might say they have an alliance with Player B, while Player B will say they know nothing about any alliances, that no one offered them anything, and that they didn't agree to anything.
The only thing that can help is the logs of the correspondence, but they can be deleted on both sides, leaving no trace, or a recording of the game where these correspondences are visible, but few people show their chat during the broadcast.
Speculations about Player A having to know everything that Player B does cannot be the basis for an accusation; facts are needed.

.

I won't quote the entire message, but GOD! you're wrong! :D :D :D
You correctly stated that ignorance of the law is no excuse, so here's the rule in Heroes of Might and Magic: it's forbidden to take artifacts and Pandora from a guarded location without killing the guardian first. The moment a player does this, they automatically lose. Now, regarding the second player to whom he passed the artifact, since the player is already considered to have lost at the moment of violating the rules, there are two options: the first is to declare the second player also a loser due to their alliance, or simply because (at the judge's discretion), and the second, which is more lenient and unrealistic in my opinion, is to replay the game without the player who violated the rules, and in turn, assign them a technical loss. :smile13:

My question was from the perspective of the rules: does the second player violate the rules in such a case or not? And does a player have the right to deliberately break the rules, and what consequences await them — a loss is obvious, but is there something more serious or not???
Since this is not a 2v2 tournament, it seemed to me that the second player does not violate them. But if after the game they also conceal these actions, and even conceal the Dragon Fly Hive — then that means they themselves decided that these actions were dishonest. Therefore, I hope there will definitely be no such players.