Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Which unit in the Haven castle do you like the most (based on its appearance)?
Inquisitors are coolly done, but monks are ugly IMHO. Overall, I like the angel and archangel the most. Finally, they actually look like themselves! The paladin and Knight are also well-drawn, only it's strange that shooters always hit them in the horse's hoof and because of this they get wounded and die... The crossbowman and archer are very good. The man-at-arms is just super, the swordsman not so much (by the way, have you noticed that when you wound them, they howl like wind in pipes? Seems like some kind of nonsense to me) Griffins are cute. I heard an objection here, can't remember where, that they supposedly stand on 4 legs while on coats of arms they were on two — lions there were also on two, and this was called a "lion passant" (meaning walking, not pissing — that's from French). So griffins standing on 4 legs is not a problem. Now the peasants did not please me! I would call such a unit a "nightmare". They are completely disproportionate! Militia are no better.
С Пути сбивают мелкие достижения, а изощрённые суждения скрывают смысл слов. И вот уже возникают "правильное" и "неправильное"... - Чжуан-цзы Сильванис
Improved swordsmen (due to some resemblance to the Crusaders in Heroes of Might and Magic III) and paladins are worthy, well-armored fighters. In general, both of these units also look good together – it’s clear that they belong to the same army.
The un-upgraded griffin and the knight (squire) look the best; the angels are an exact copy from Disciples 2 (not original; they look better in Heroes 3). The worst creature for the Haven faction is the upgraded griffin; inquisitors and paladins are also not very impressive. The paladins in Heroes 1 were much better; you could really feel their power... the champions in Heroes 3 are much more appealing than the paladins in Heroes 5.
I voted a long time ago, and now here are my comments. Archer, crossbowman – they perfectly match the class and look great. Griffons (both) – in my opinion, they are almost a masterpiece, colorful, typical, logical, in short, they are great! Monk – also fits the class well.
An angel/archangel is good on its own, regardless of gender. An Inquisitor is decent. A Paladin is impressive; finally, he looks like a tank, which is what he is!
The Inquisitors are well-designed, but the monks are hideous, in my opinion. Overall, I like the angel and archangel the most. They finally look like themselves! The paladin and knight are also well-drawn, but it's strange that their arrows always hit the horse's hoof, and they get injured and die from it... The crossbowman and archer are very good. The pikeman is generally great, the swordsman is not very good (by the way, did you notice that when you injure them, they howl like the wind in pipes? I think it's nonsense). The griffins are cute. I heard an objection somewhere, I don't remember where, that they are standing on 4 legs, but on the coats of arms they were on two - lions were also on two, and it was called "lion passant" (that is, walking, not peeing - this is from French). So, griffins standing on 4 legs are not scary. But the peasants didn't please me! I would call such a unit a "nightmare." They are completely disproportionately built! The militia are not much better.
I agree about the peasants, and the militia are not great either. But I don't understand why the angels/archangels are female? Or is this an insult to Christianity? Also, most of the units are very short. The archer and crossbowman also seemed good to me at first, but if you zoom in on their faces, they are so fat, especially the crossbowman, that their cheeks don't fit in the helmet and are all wavy, and the archer is somehow scary. In general, the faces didn't turn out very well
The un-upgraded griffin and the knight (squire) turned out the best; the angels are an exact copy from Disciples 2 (not original, they look better in the 3rd game). The worst creation for humans is the upgraded griffin; inquisitors and paladins are also not impressive. The paladins in the 1st Heroes game were great; you could feel their power... the champions in the 3rd game are much better than the paladins in the 5th game.
In Disciples, the angels are completely different... they are all white, in some kind of unclear armor, and with a spear... but here they have a sword, a hood, and they are not white.
Artes
Arandor
