Skip to content

Posts from Round table Auto-translated

5.0 (2 ratings)
User Avatar
#3251
Auto-translated
Play for fun.
In reply to KobRa_RR
User Avatar
#3252
Auto-translated
KobRa_RR
Play for fun.

By the way, it's a good idea to play for stakes, even if it's just $5. In addition to everything mentioned above.
Пусть мой враг будет силен и страшен. Если я поборю его, то не буду чувствовать стыда.
User Avatar
#3253
Auto-translated
If they're going to waste your time with such mediocre games in the seasonal mode, they should at least pay you for it.
#3254
Auto-translated
numOne, I agree. But - usually at the beginning of the game, they ask: with a report? and if yes, then feel free to submit it. I didn't used to appreciate reports either, but they really increase responsibility for the game.
FireToSky, if it's a hassle, play 1-2 more games with an opponent and post everything.

Added 2 minutes ago
And - I'll remind you of my infamous proposal to pay for the auto-win with half a victory. IMHO, it's not more annoying than trading for color, race, or hero.
In reply to zoog
User Avatar
#3255
Auto-translated
zoog
numOne, I agree. But - usually at the beginning of the game, they ask: with a report? and if yes, then feel free to submit it. I didn't used to appreciate reports either, but with them, there is really more responsibility for the game.
FireToSky, if it's a hassle, play 1-2 more games with an opponent and post everything.

Added 2 minutes ago
And - I'll remind you of my infamous proposal to pay for the auto with half a victory. IMHO, it's not worse than trading for color, race, or hero.
and what is it for?
#3256
Auto-translated
So that there’s a proper victory, connection with a partner, feelings, the smell of sweat… I don’t know, what else might be lacking in these losing matches.
User Avatar
#3257
Auto-translated
The season is degrading as a tournament for this very reason. Many are not capable of competing for 1st place in the ranking, and 1-2 games don't decide anything. I play Factions very, very rarely, so I don't write reports. What will I gain from 3-4 victories?
User Avatar
#3258
Auto-translated
in my opinion, those who play for the sake of the rating are the ones who degrade.
User Avatar
#3259
Auto-translated
No, what does the medal have to do with it? With this approach, after the first 1-2 months of the season, people wouldn't even play. It used to be better; I remember people playing to win, but now everyone has become spoiled by the abundance of tournaments. They play in the season without any effort, without the right attitude, which leads to constant unfinished games and losses. It seems like they manage to get into the game, but they don't want to continue.
Perhaps the inflated timer, which generally prolongs the game, also plays a role, because postponing a game in the season completely kills the already small motivation. It really needs to be reduced.
Пусть мой враг будет силен и страшен. Если я поборю его, то не буду чувствовать стыда.
User Avatar
#3260
Auto-translated
I think the top 3 players of the season should receive free tickets to the FB. Or whatever the most prestigious tournament is right now.
In reply to StickyFingaz
User Avatar
#3261
Auto-translated
StickyFingaz
I think the top 3 players of the season should receive free tickets to the FB. or whatever the most prestigious tournament is now.

That's a good idea, by the way.
Не бійся коли ти один, бійся коли ти нуль.

484800548

User Avatar
#3262
Auto-translated
I don't have any others, it's time to get used to it.
It's just that I still think there are no tournaments prestigious enough on HeroesWorld for players to go for seasonal subscriptions
User Avatar
#3263
Auto-translated
to generate interest in something, you need to entice people with something appealing. What's appealing in the seasonal format? Only the top 1?!
Create:
1) A permanent tournament ONLY for the top 10 (???) -> then (possibly) a battle between the winners of such seasonal tournaments, like in "King of the Hill" (winner spring 2012 VS summer 2012 - then the winner from that pair plays against the next winner of the top 10 autumn 2012 tournament... if they win, they become a two-time winner...
2) Top 1-2 (???) in the Facebook bracket without selection (???) or better in the quarter-finals (or semi-finals of the Facebook bracket ??? - so it doesn't get too easy)
3) ... who else has any suggestions?
#3264
Auto-translated
What's the point of encouragement if a person isn't interested in the game itself, if they don't want to see the match through to the end – rewards won't help. But I often surrender before the last scout dies – when, for example, the necessary minimum hasn't been built, because I can't or don't want to rely on the opponent making a mistake or not having a good strategy.
User Avatar
#3265
Auto-translated
to zoog
but what’s the reason for all this? – because if you don’t care about the season/rating, there are no rewards?!