Posts from Mafia 60. Nonsense, mayhem, and a few artifacts. Auto-translated

I am open to dialogue with everyone.

I already wrote that "suspicion" is not an accusation for me. And in the first few days, my attention was mainly focused on banned users and newcomers.

He was executed based on this suspicion. So it's hard to call it just a suspicion for the sake of spreading rumors.

I'm explaining it to the others who played there (for example, Koshi or Artsa). Although, if you're neutral and want to understand the situation, you can quickly skim through it and find the execution of Hosa; I provided such evidence that day, plus I had accused him before, but that's not the main point. Although, what's the point, I won't be here until 1 AM and will leave soon, so decide for yourself. But I'll remind the others that the last time I fought like this, I was neutral, and when they were ganging up on me and accusing Artsa, I didn't care at all (by the way, you, Zubr, were there).

In other words, I was supposed to react immediately to even your suspicions, but you don't even acknowledge my accusations, even though they might not be supported by evidence? Can you see the contradiction, or not?

The phrase "with everyone" implies that you are commenting on everyone. You simply ignored me.

Why didn't you read my accusations? At least you didn't ask why I came to that conclusion. You just ignored it, that's a fact.

Koshka decided on her own who to execute, and I don't think you were involved.

I think it's worth taking the risk.I think Zubr can be trusted; I just got a little carried away with my paranoia.
Execute the Winner.

Should I give you a medal for your merits, or what?

You portray yourself as a player who carefully reads all posts. But you simply ignored mine. I clearly wrote that on the second and third days, I briefly skimmed through the posts because there were too many. So don't be surprised that I didn't read your "accusations" of the Winner carefully.

I don't even know who to believe. Maybe you're both peaceful players?

No, I'm pointing out a difference in behavior. My current behavior is consistent with that of a winner against Revan. And yes, I've said a hundred times that I'm not interested in playing as Mafia, so even when I am Mafia, I don't even try to accuse anyone or defend myself.

What kind of a peaceful player is she if she doesn't even read the thread, but suddenly starts throwing quotes at me as if they were pulled out of a magic hat?

And? What does that imply?) Suspecting is good, I already said that. 100% peaceful players are often killed.

Where did he mark him? Plus, this could be an excuse. And let's end with the fact that there wasn't a single word in the rules saying that mafia players couldn't use Dimension Door before nnv. You thought of that yourself and talked about it in chat with the winner. That's why he didn't hesitate to answer the question for you.

Once per game, can prevent a player's execution. Triggers after the end of the day as "No one was executed".

These are all empty arguments. I have at least twice as many games where I'm on the Mafia's side compared to being on the Town's side. Should I be hanged now based on that probability?))

I don't want to disappoint you, but I don't like taking responsibility for executing Mirks. Therefore, trying to draw the city's attention to the Winner, I referred to Zubr, whom they more or less trusted at that time, and who might have been willing to betray the Winner instead of me.