Posts from Which is better, attacking or defending? Auto-translated

I think it's better to upgrade attack at the beginning of the game! :smile13: :smile13: !!Then upgrade defense!:smile28:

Actually, it's better to do the opposite. At the beginning, it's better to preserve your army and focus on defense, as the damage reduction is twice as effective as increasing attack. Useful skills like resilience, evasion, and last stand are, in my opinion, needed by every race.

it's actually better to do the opposite. at the beginning, it's better to focus on defense and preserving your army. The damage reduction is twice as effective as increasing attack power. Useful skills like resilience, evasion, and last stand are beneficial for every race, in my opinion.

Well... yes! Of course, you can level up defense!!! :smile01: But, for example, if you're playing as Necropolis, their army is cheap! It's better to level up both defense and attack!:smile01: Because you need both equally! :)

Added after 3 minutes
And, for example, if you're playing as Haven, level up the attack of their archers! And the battle will definitely be in your favor.

Well... yes! Of course, you can upgrade defense!!! :smile01: But for example, if you play as Necropolis, their army is cheap! It's better to upgrade both defense and attack:smile01: because you need both equally! :)

What does the army cost have to do with it? It's better to play Necropolis defensively, as they are better suited as manipulators, and defense is more important for them.

What does the army cost have to do with it? It's better to play Necropolis defensively, as they are better suited as support units, and defense is more important for them.

Yes, because losing an army for Necropolis isn't as painful as, for example, for Haven! I usually start by attacking (this is just my opinion) :smile04:

Hmm, perhaps the most accurate statement would be that they are equal. This is because different tactics are chosen in different situations. I voted for defense, and now I will explain why. Warrior heroes (Knights, Haven, Orcs, etc.) mainly rely on their army, i.e., they develop both defense and attack. Magic heroes (Necropolis, Academy, etc.) usually don't allow themselves to develop both defense and attack simultaneously because their place is usually taken by magical skills. And here the question arises - what to choose, defense or attack? And here, in my opinion, it is better to choose defense (except for the Warlock and the Dwarf, who can choose both defense and attack) because the hero's army must withstand the attack while the hero casts spells. So, defense has a slight advantage in terms of prevalence, so to speak.

With a well-planned attack, there’s no one to defend against.

Attack. Because we need to eliminate our enemies as quickly as possible. Defense is also good, but combined with it, the attack won't be as effective. And this leads to long and drawn-out battles, especially when both we and the enemy have the same defense stats. I vote for attack.