Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Here's an example from the Wargame Tactics chat: you can read tons of discussions, all sorts of nonsense, but I've NEVER seen arguments about settings.
Maybe it's because the people who don't like Wargame Tactics don't hang out in that chat :D And they don't argue because they don't care about Wargame Tactics and its settings? :)
Added 3 minutes later Javdet
Heroes 3 wasn't created by God, but by an ordinary guy from the Netherlands, who didn't even imagine that you could play it online at such a level.
You know, I had a very serious argument with one person. He insisted that the programmers (developers) weren't noobs in their game. But they could (and did) play very well. And they "understood" the game. And all the imbalance was not done by accident, but a whole concept was developed for it. And it was all done on purpose.
Сейчас балуюсь этим https://vcmi.eu/download/ За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
GoedenDagDo it right. Well, he does what he can and suggests reasonable things. The paranoid ones get in the way; they see encroachments on the sacred SoD in everything and rush into a struggle to save it.
In general, "Do it right" in this case is very similar to "Achieve something first!"; there is a decent analysis of such arguments here http://lurkmore.to/Сперва_Добейся
Награда: Лучшему игроку сезона Осень 2009 за замок Конфлюкс
Do it right – that’s well said. In life, I’ve noticed that those who give valuable advice and criticize others’ work often do so because they only have a superficial understanding of it and are not capable of doing what they are talking about. But at the same time, they want to appear intelligent. There are two ways to boost one’s authority: either by doing something better than your competitor, or by criticizing your competitor and their work. In the latter case, you don’t have to do anything, and you don’t even need to be an expert.
A little humor, but on topic:
I love and often eat "Snickers", but my mom often buys "Mars", but it's not as good as "Snickers". After a couple of years, when I was really tired of this unfair (imbalanced:D) difference between these chocolate bars, I decided to write to the manufacturer of "Mars" to ask them to start putting peanuts in their chocolate bars...
P.S. It reminds me of...
"Никто не уходит из героев вечно", - убедился на личном опыте, гоняю в сингле до сих пор :D
I took the time to look at the link again (my first impression was that it was utter nonsense – I didn’t even bother to comment). But no, it turns out that everything there is simply turned upside down. It’s not a specialist criticizing something; on the contrary, the garbage doesn’t like being pointed out for its stench, and it starts to stink even more, trying to suffocate the critic-specialist with its fumes. There are two options here: either suggest that the garbage do something truly worthwhile (besides stinking) or just leave the garbage alone so it doesn’t stink. :D :D :D :D :D I think the link isn’t entirely relevant.
Hunter, I would do this if I were you: forget about Snickers and Mars, and choose some other candy. :smile20: No one’s interests are supported, and everyone will be happy.
Hunter, if I were you, I'd do this—toss both the Snickers and the Mars, and pick some Nuts instead. No one's interest is favored, and everyone will be happy.
To be honest, I just made up this story and there's no realism in it. It's just how it always goes: you see something good and consider it ordinary, and then you say that it should be like that everywhere and that "it's impossible any other way." The same thing happened with one-way roads; they were made two-way in WT, and people started grumbling about SoD... and then at Baratorch, wanting him to make them the same two-way roads in the HD mod (while actually just forgetting that the mod only improves the interface, not the gameplay). By the way, one-way roads are still a bit interesting to play with—adrenaline, after all!:D P.S. as for me, it's better not Nuts, but Russia—a generous soul!:)
"Никто не уходит из героев вечно", - убедился на личном опыте, гоняю в сингле до сих пор :D
By the way, playing with one-way portals is actually quite interesting; it gives you an adrenaline rush!:D
The adrenaline rush is only for those who don't read the inscription on the object before entering the teleport and only find out where they ended up after visiting it. It's also interesting to play tank battles, digging games, and counting games – you definitely won't have to delve into the complexities of teleport problems on HL+U templates there. :)
Dirty_Player
