I was also leaning towards your side, but now I'm sorry, it's not meant to be.
Posts from Турниры HeroesWorld Cup & World Cup - 2012
P.S. Roma, do you remember the red balloon in Dragon Utopia?:)
(I gave this example to both Stiki and Pete, that one shouldn't jump to conclusions from the saves themselves, but should evaluate the explanations).
484800548
I looked at the saves. Yesterday I was also watching the game and was surprised that the Chinese player was very timely at his castle with a full army and ready....now it turns out that he didn't even see what ГО he had and there wasn't a single review either...so the point of rushing back home from an unfinished and, most importantly, unexplored treasury is extremely unclear...Plus, on 121 he takes a Griffin Conservatory-two, which shows up as 2-4 and doesn't send a scout there to check....and the maximum, imho, definitely wasn't taken with his army on 121...And the games with Terek's skill tree path are also unclear....Well, and the question, who did he leave the other 2 conservatories for at his respawn, why didn't he take them immediately (especially considering that the far one was a single, but he didn't check it either)? In short, a shady story....
It's time to rename the tournament to CheaterWorldCup 2012 )))
PS by the way, before these saves I hadn't thought about it, but in my 2nd game with him there was also a similar moment: he emerges into the center almost without an army and boldly rotates there. If my hero had been nearby, even with a medium army and medium skill level, it would have meant ГГ.
I should take another look at his saves
Зима 2011-12.
1. Why did this come to light only after 2.5 months?
2. Why isn't the issue of replaying the matches of black_knight and yarzapp being raised? After all, according to the judges' conclusions about maphacking, both of them are victims. And one of them should play against Pit for LM for the right to compete in the next round.
I don't understand where the logic is in disqualifying one player for "unfair play" and then immediately removing two more from the bracket, even though they seemed to be playing fairly. In this situation, the stories about a lack of time for games, etc., are really laughable. And if someone decided to voluntarily give up their spot, where can we read about that?
As a regular viewer, I find this very interesting!!! (Moving players to another bracket is also not entirely the right solution)
Although the main question is in point 1.
Стримы и обучение тут:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWlnXU5R5RLCMuWzIpBc65Q
1. Why did this only come up after 2.5 months?
it's really funny
now, regarding moving Pete from the lower bracket to the upper bracket. He played against a cheater and lost in an unfair match, and since there's still time, I can change the situation, unlike Black and Yarzap's games. I think this is a fair decision. For example, you can look at cycling races where those who came in second can be awarded gold medals half a year later because the winner was caught doping.
1. Why did this issue only surface after 2.5 months?
Although the main question is in point 1.
OURS ARE BEING BEATEN!!!
Can anyone shed some light on the incident at the World Championship:
1. Why did this come to light only after 2.5 months?
2. Why isn't the issue of replaying the games of players black_knight and yarzapp being raised? After all, according to the judges' conclusions about maphacking, both of them are victims. And one of them should play against Pit for LM for the right to compete in the next round.
I don't understand where the logic is in disqualifying one player for "unfair play" and immediately removing two more from the bracket, who, as far as I can tell, played fairly. In this situation, the stories about a lack of time for games, etc., are really funny. And if someone decided to voluntarily give up their place, where can we read about it?
As a regular viewer, I find this very interesting!!! (Moving players to another bracket is also not entirely the right solution)
Although the main question is in point 1.
Now, it seems, there is a new problem with a highly respected player from China.
If he is also cheating (and, in my opinion, there is more compromising evidence in one of his games than in all of Rebellius's games), then personally, I feel "hurt and offended." It turns out that I, like an idiot, honestly played with him, played, was very upset because of what seemed like bad luck, and also asked why I played so badly... and it turns out he was CHEATING!!))) And there are many such victims.
Since 2 arguments were enough to sink Rebellius, there are at least 2 in the game Gomunguls vs. the Chinese player - Stiky, investigate
Зима 2011-12.
I think this is a fair solution. For example, you can look at cycling races where those who came in second place can be awarded gold medals six months later because the winner was caught doping.
Sticks, get to work.