Posts from Rank reset.

It's funny, Durman doesn't need ranks, but disabling the counter is necessary. Although the first point could be a minor argument for the second.

O_O? Where did I say I was in favor of disabling the counter? Ranks aren't necessary for me in this form, only because we've had them in our clan for a long time, and otherwise, it just becomes something unclear... So, it's purely my opinion.

In my opinion, intra-clan awards are unnecessary; they only bring shame to both the player and the clan.

If you don’t award yourself a medal, no one will.

In my opinion, intra-clan awards are unnecessary; they only bring shame to both the player and the clan.

But what do awards have to do with it? Ranks and awards are not the same thing. ) And the "policy" of a clan is determined only by the clan itself, unless it contradicts the rules of the entire forum. For example, we use ranks to determine a player's strength in Heroes 5, not the number of posts. Arandor, does anyone give awards to themselves in clans? Can you provide a link to an award so I can see what it's for? In principle, I'm in favor of returning ranks in the General sense, but not in exactly the same form as before. Although, if they return the old system, it can be easily modernized. But again, this will increase differentiation based on an additional criterion. I wonder, what will be used as an avatar in the mafia then? :) The highest level of Don Carlone, perhaps? :D If not everyone registers for Heroes, then they won't indicate a race for their heroes... What rank will they have then? Although, on the other hand, the counter and rank that have already been shown are almost the same thing...

For those who didn't choose a faction, neutral creatures from the third game were automatically added to their ranks.

Ranks for sections? Definitely a strange idea.

For example, in Heroes 5, ranks determine a player's strength, not the number of posts.

Forum ranks directly depend on the number of posts.

Ranks for sections?

:eek: Why? Did you fall from a tree or something?

Forum ranks directly depend on the number of posts.

I already explained that above:

Although, on the other hand, the displayed counter and rank are almost the same...

And I think ranks based on the number of posts are not entirely correct. ;)

For those who didn't choose a race, neutral units from the third part were automatically assigned to their ranks.

I didn't know that. But it feels very "like the third game".

In the fourth game, the levels are fun (by the way, there was talk about introducing ranks from the fourth part), but in the fifth game, there are too few neutral creatures.

In the fifth installment, there was still an alternate upgrade that they never implemented, even though they wanted to. And now, with the sixth game, they added three tiers of creatures instead of seven. Ranks are great, of course, but I'm afraid this is already a relic of the past.

In the fifth game, there was still an alt-upgrade that they never implemented, even though they wanted to. And here, the sixth game added its own 3 tiers of creatures instead of 7. Ranks are great, of course, but I'm afraid this is already a relic of the past.

The sixth game corresponds to the old type of ranking system. There are 7x2 types of monsters for each castle.
As for the fourth game, there is no correspondence, unfortunately, although something can be devised.

In "Heroes of Might and Magic VI", troops within the same tier also have a specific order. So, everything works as intended there.

Even if they didn't exist, it's more of a visual distinction than a strict categorization.

And yet, it exists, so it would be logical to create ranks in the same sequence on HeroesWorld. If they actually do it.

Ranks are for decorating the forum. Just like well-groomed trees and hedges are used to decorate the main streets of large cities. Simply to please the eye. So, let there be ranks!