Supreme
Auto-translated
Guys, have some mercy on the poor elf... I'm going to die laughing soon....
Don't you have any sense of proportion? Anyway, the answer is: Smoke, Magnus doesn't have any crowns, scepters, artifacts, or castles – this is an indisputable truth from the GM. The only logical explanation is that excessive hookah smoking is causing hallucinations. Tengro, if you set the status to "participant," then at least write down the level and stats. Make sure that normal abilities and items are described.
Magnus, I can allow you to use the story you described in your application... if, upon arriving at Auchan, you lost all the described items (they didn't transfer here), and also, the spells from that world don't work here. Come up with some abilities for yourself. You can keep the boot, but it has lost its power :) I haven't been able to sleep for several nights without smiling, remembering the elephant in a boot hovering over the sea :D You're going to drive me to an early grave, I swear.
Regarding the Inquisitor... This is the second time the Inquisitor has acted so arbitrarily. Do you even realize what you're writing? The riders were pursued by the Paladins of the Emperor's garrison... you even wrote that it was half the garrison. You joined the fleeing group, and you captured the Stronghold... I'm speechless.
I don't want to ban anyone myself... I suggest we discuss with the GMs what to do about this specific incident with the Inquisitor (it would be better if you were a peasant after all :) it would be calmer ;) )?
I suggest this approach in the future to avoid armies being wiped out by a single character. (similar to Eric the Red, but on a smaller scale. He killed all the bandits with a level 1 character).
If the GM says that a group is moving or thieves are sitting by the fire, etc.
and the player (group) decides to fight, then he/they say "I/we engage in combat." Then, the GM describes the battle and gives the result. You defeated everyone without losses, suffered light wounds, suffered heavy wounds, you were tied up, etc.
That is, the GM conducts the battle with a group (battles with single enemies that are not much stronger than you can be handled by yourselves).
However, a character/group can describe to the GM all their pros and cons in a given situation, such as suddenly attacking from the forest or having bows and firing the first volley... that is, you can describe your first action in battle. You can also describe the desired outcome. The results of the first action and the subsequent battle are described only by the GMs, taking into account the bonuses of the players' position, if any. As well as the outcome of the battle.
I'll describe as an example how Smoke should have written about stunning and tearing everyone apart in Verdan's group.
"The fog seems to be clearing... rage awakens... the effect of the poison subsides, I rush at Magnus and the group with the desire to take another shard from them and run away."
Please share your thoughts on the proposal and what to do with the Inquisitor?
Sincerely, Supreme
Don't you have any sense of proportion? Anyway, the answer is: Smoke, Magnus doesn't have any crowns, scepters, artifacts, or castles – this is an indisputable truth from the GM. The only logical explanation is that excessive hookah smoking is causing hallucinations. Tengro, if you set the status to "participant," then at least write down the level and stats. Make sure that normal abilities and items are described.
Magnus, I can allow you to use the story you described in your application... if, upon arriving at Auchan, you lost all the described items (they didn't transfer here), and also, the spells from that world don't work here. Come up with some abilities for yourself. You can keep the boot, but it has lost its power :) I haven't been able to sleep for several nights without smiling, remembering the elephant in a boot hovering over the sea :D You're going to drive me to an early grave, I swear.
Regarding the Inquisitor... This is the second time the Inquisitor has acted so arbitrarily. Do you even realize what you're writing? The riders were pursued by the Paladins of the Emperor's garrison... you even wrote that it was half the garrison. You joined the fleeing group, and you captured the Stronghold... I'm speechless.
I don't want to ban anyone myself... I suggest we discuss with the GMs what to do about this specific incident with the Inquisitor (it would be better if you were a peasant after all :) it would be calmer ;) )?
I suggest this approach in the future to avoid armies being wiped out by a single character. (similar to Eric the Red, but on a smaller scale. He killed all the bandits with a level 1 character).
If the GM says that a group is moving or thieves are sitting by the fire, etc.
and the player (group) decides to fight, then he/they say "I/we engage in combat." Then, the GM describes the battle and gives the result. You defeated everyone without losses, suffered light wounds, suffered heavy wounds, you were tied up, etc.
That is, the GM conducts the battle with a group (battles with single enemies that are not much stronger than you can be handled by yourselves).
However, a character/group can describe to the GM all their pros and cons in a given situation, such as suddenly attacking from the forest or having bows and firing the first volley... that is, you can describe your first action in battle. You can also describe the desired outcome. The results of the first action and the subsequent battle are described only by the GMs, taking into account the bonuses of the players' position, if any. As well as the outcome of the battle.
I'll describe as an example how Smoke should have written about stunning and tearing everyone apart in Verdan's group.
"The fog seems to be clearing... rage awakens... the effect of the poison subsides, I rush at Magnus and the group with the desire to take another shard from them and run away."
Please share your thoughts on the proposal and what to do with the Inquisitor?
Sincerely, Supreme