Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Mafia 40. In the Name of the EmperorAuto-translated
but the mafias are so dumb that they supposedly all team up to frame someone for being the inkeeper, voting for one person.
Where did you get that from?
I don't want to lynch Lynx because I have my own opinion. I don't want to follow the crowd; I have my own opinion. If everyone thinks I played badly for the town and clearly tempted the town marksman to gut me out of my armor like opening a can, then they have problems with logic.
Yeah, I forced the archer to kill himself. That's what someone wrote on the second day, and we all laughed about it. Every murder is someone forcing another person to kill them, I guess.
Where did you get that from?
Well, how about this: maybe I'm an Ink who's saving his partner, Link. Or maybe I'm not an Ink, but I'm voting for the company. We're all just fools, voting together for one person. It's a slightly primitive logic, in my opinion.
It's strange that none of the peaceful characters, killed by the marksman in previous games, are upset. If Hermit had whined so much about being killed by Locken, it would have been unpleasant! But here, the reason is justified and logical. However, it upset our Arandor so much that he's been acting out since the day of the murder. Obviously, he's a whiner, a noob, and a lol.
you're going to tell me I don't need to answer questions now. lol and I was being rude even after Hermit was killed, so what? It's quite possible that I'll continue to do so in the future.
But here, the reason is justified and logical.
subjective opinion. very I actually wrote about this in my first message. I don't know why it was necessary to respond to it, to Zubr's response, and to start this discussion
But it really hurt her feelings.
things like this don't offend, quite the opposite. rather, it amuses and slightly puzzles. and since when has expressing one's opinion, answering accusations, and giving feedback about a person been called "butthurt" and the like? isn't that trolling?
Well, what can I say? The team was a complete mess. On the first day, they couldn't even get the conference call set up, and the night turned out to be quite eventful. Later on, someone constantly had internet problems, or they just got disconnected. It's a great game. Special thanks to Tox, who somehow got a big head.
Also, the description of the chain sword is unclear. Maybe I'm just an idiot, but for some reason, I thought that this description meant something completely different.
Regarding him, why don't we punish him? For example, by not allowing him to participate in the next three games. It would be one thing if it was an accident, but he deliberately tried to reveal his role.
Что такое осень - это небо Плачущее небо под ногами
I was also quite outspoken even after Hermit was killed.
Egotism detected. I don't care about your statements; I was talking about Hermit and his statements.
subjective opinion. very.
All decisions in Mafia can be called subjectivism. But the presence of logic and justification does not negate this. You still have a lot to learn, young Padawan.
rather, it amuses and slightly confuses.
That's why I see you having fun everywhere, shouting that the murderer is an idiot and that everything was done in vain. Are you practicing masochism?
But the presence of logic and justification doesn't negate that.
and? I didn't deny the logic. I just called it primitive for a 40th game. Can't I?)
That's why I see you having fun, shouting everywhere that the killer is an idiot and did everything wrong. Are you practicing masochism?
but it was for nothing. Many people use harsh words, so what? Should we look for less harsh words? Why make hasty conclusions, get defensive, and look for hidden meanings? I still won't believe that you are all empaths and psychics.
And? I wasn't denying logic. I just said it's too simplistic for a game from 2004. Can't I?
Who are you to judge someone else's logic, lol? It exists – that's more than enough to justify your killing. You should look for logic in your own posts and prove that they didn't raise any suspicions, you drug addict.
But it was for nothing.
The doctor treated the wrong person! :O It was for nothing!... The list can go on, the meaning is clear.
Many people use rude words, so what? Should we look for less rude ones? Why make hasty conclusions, get upset, and look for hidden meanings? I still won't believe that you're all empaths and psychics.
What are you talking about? I'm not talking about rudeness, but about tons of negative expression from you. It's obvious.
Okay,
Moderated: OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE in the message
pizdobol
, it's time to wrap it up. I've forgotten something, but no matter how much I argue with you, you won't get any smarter, lol
No game is without controversy =/ But let's look at things objectively. The killing of Arandor was by no means necessary; this is a real fact, and there's nothing you can do about it.
It would be better if you looked for logic in your posts and proved that they didn't raise suspicions, you drug addict.
A maniac is bad. It's better to have two warring sides than three, because problems might arise. And your argument is flawed. You need to consider all the differences.
What are you talking about? I'm not talking about rudeness, but about tons of negative expression from you. It's obvious.
But you judge negativity based on harsh words. And by the way, you constantly emit negativity. Not only towards me, but also towards a couple of other people. Are you upset? For you, any negativity is an upset. Lol) And what about negativity? If a person expresses their opinion (maybe rudely) or criticizes, then they are upset, even though they are sitting and drinking tea, chatting on ICQ, laughing, and smiling. But you, of course, know better)).
No game without a flame war =/
I'm not allowed to express my opinion. =( Especially Hossi loves to comment on it. He sticks to it like a leech
A maniac is bad. It's better to have two warring sides than three, because problems might arise.
Where was your opinion about Lynx? It wasn't there. You didn't appreciate the situation with her execution. You just followed the herd and that's it. You got what you deserved.
And your reasoning is flawed. You need to consider all the differences.
Of course, master, I will.
For you, any negativity is a personal offense.
Did I talk about a personal offense? I said about being offended, and don't pretend that you were laughing and drinking tea while typing in Skype after the murder, or the next day in ICQ. That's a stupid excuse.
And by the way, you constantly radiate negativity. Not just towards me, but towards a couple of other people too.
Yeah, I'm a terrible jerk, a scumbag, a fat troll, always offended, Mr. Hatred™. And it's definitely a superiority complex. But we're not talking about me.
Especially Hossi likes to comment on it.
Well, you have to teach fools, and that's what I'm doing!
You didn't assess the situation with her execution correctly.
What does "didn't assess" mean? I assessed everything and decided to execute the exposed mage, not the dubious mafia member. There was a chance, but not a 100% probability. Besides, I voted before Spira was exposed, who also could have been a mafia member, but pretended to be a mage to live for another day or two. I would have done the same, because in that case, there is a small chance. Obvious options.
Was I talking about being upset? I said I was offended, and don't pretend that you were laughing and drinking tea, writing in Skype after the murder or the next day in ICQ. That's a stupid excuse.
You were talking about it. We were talking to Revan, you jumped in and wrote about being upset. The next day? Lol. Yes, I don't even use ICQ, I don't laugh, and I don't drink tea. But why would I say otherwise? That is, you don't think that at the time the newspaper came out, I was chatting in ICQ with someone (which I usually do), we were joking and laughing, and at the same time I was writing in Skype? 100% info?) I probably don't drink tea and don't chat in ICQ right now either.
Yes, I'm generally a terrible jerk, a scumbag, a fat troll, always upset, Mr. Hatred™. And it's also a superiority complex, undoubtedly.
You forgot about the pretentiousness. But otherwise, yes. Heh.
But we're not talking about me.
I wasn't even talking to you, and we finished talking with Revan a long time ago, after my rhetorical question. Then there was Zubr's response to his "accusation." But what do you want? I don't understand. Especially you, who constantly interferes everywhere. Do you need the most attention or what?
Just like in all the previous games where Arandor was killed or lost, Arandor is complaining. Arandor always complains, so I think you're wasting your time arguing with him, because in the next game he'll complain again anyway.
Overall, the game turned out well. And in my opinion, the town played excellently. The best player, no offense to anyone, I would call Revan.
Thank you all for the game, town, congratulations on the victory. Lorri, special thanks to you, you're a good GM.
kcfgogbfalgfl
