Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Didn't realize that right away. A definite advantage of the Swiss system is that it allows you to match up opponents who have a common time for games, which is also an important thing.
Земля нуля. Все в ней нулево и кукольно.
StickyFingaz
Auto-translated
It seems she is rarely played on HeroesWorld.
and for good reason. Various qualifiers where it is necessary to determine the top N players should only be held using the Swiss system!
I’ll give it a try. WishmasteR 570865745 10 minutes
I'm too f*cking old To sell my soul
GoD
Auto-translated
I'm in favor of 16 groups of 4 players each.
There isn't much time for the group stage – each player has 3 games in their group.
Each player will have at least 3 games.
Pasha, I didn't understand the issue about players not making it out of the group? If several players have the same number of points, there's the Berger coefficient, head-to-head results, and who finished all the games faster – we already have experience with this in tournaments.
Then, from the round of 16, it's an Olympic-style bracket.
In my opinion, this is a good option.
"РЫЦАРЬ АПОКАЛИПСИСА"
Dimast
Auto-translated
I also support the idea of having 16 groups of 4.
RomarioGrom
Auto-translated
Oleg, sorry, but I went through everything again and probably won't be able to handle Jebus Cross in 10 minutes. I hope a replacement isn't a problem — there are plenty of people interested
1. In some groups, everything will be decided on time (and in some even ahead of schedule, given a clear certainty regarding place distribution). Others will require additional games, sometimes 2-3 rounds (for example, this happened in "allrandom", where a situation occurred where "seven are waiting for one"). It should also be noted that there will be no fast games, such as the SoD template on 10 minutes.
2. What is the point of spending 2 months on a preliminary stage of little interest if it's followed by a "lottery" Olympic stage; wouldn't it be more logical to play for elimination right away?
3. Experience shows that on "long" templates, the fewer insignificant games there are, the better for the participants.
P.S.
Experience regarding additional indicators in relation to groups of 4 people is completely unsuccessful.
Berger and head-to-head encounters do not work in most cases.
For example, in my group on "allrandom", a situation arose where between Artem - Cobra and myself, the one who played sooner against Marajan—who by that time had already lost his chances—would advance to the next stage. We decided to play additional games to avoid this absurdity.
Земля нуля. Все в ней нулево и кукольно.
abuseYT
abuseYT 347-911-297 8 минут
KobRa_RR
Auto-translated
it's been a while since we had a Swiss-system tournament, but a double-elimination bracket will do, plus the advantage is that there are no meaningless games. Pasha has already said everything about the disadvantages of group stages - this isn't the Champions League in football, so there's no commercial sense in them.
Juristis
Juristis 488-784-621 ICQ juristis18 - Skype 8 мин
Sevan_80
Auto-translated
RiMpel2, if possible, create a video recording of the draw (people love watching videos).
Piterius
Auto-translated
Piterius ICQ: 407907277 10 min for the Swiss system.