Skip to content

Posts from Мафия 39. Piece of emptiness for the small December.

Mafia Closed Topic
No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
User Avatar
#1447
Auto-translated
If you undress and fall asleep in the snow in a remote, uninhabited area, you can die.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
User Avatar
#1448
Auto-translated
What else will you tell me? Maybe you can explain that redirection only works if both targets have moved, and you can't block players this way? Or that the Scientist can't be redirected at all, even if he moves?
It's like a kindergarten level, how can Hostor not understand such a simple thing.
Tell me more, huh? We asked Vissi twice what would happen when the targets of a Necromancer's Death Ripple are switched, and both times we received information that neither target would move. So, in this way, you can block.
And about the Scientist, it's just ridiculous. Where did you get the idea that he can't be redirected? But okay. Even if he couldn't be redirected, the second target of the Engineer would still receive the Scientist as a target. And skipping the Necromancer's Death Ripple = block. It's that simple.
So, these are just pathetic excuses from a pathetic town that couldn't even analyze the situation at the very end.
User Avatar
#1449
Auto-translated
Tell me, what's up? We asked Wissy twice what would happen when the targets of a Necromancer are changed, both when the Necromancer sends the Necromantic Doom and when they don't use it. And both times, we received information that neither target would move. So, in this way, it's possible to block.
So, he was favoring one of the sides, what can you say.
Well, and the Scientist is just amazing. Where did you dig up the information that he doesn't redirect? But okay. Even if he didn't redirect, the Engineer's second target would still receive the Scientist as a target. And skipping the Necromantic Doom equals a block. It's all simple.
I asked him about every aspect of my Necromantic Doom, including this. Just wild fantasies.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
In reply to Nyashechka Kavai
User Avatar
#1450
Auto-translated
What if redirection is used on a sender who has both ND and non-ND units?
Nothing will happen.

I couldn't find the second question.
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
User Avatar
#1451
Auto-translated
So, he was playing favorites, what can you say.
GMA should be banned! -__- We spent so much time figuring out how to avoid redirects and blocks from such a group, and it turns out that's what was really happening. Lol.
I asked him about every aspect of his moderation, including this. Sweaty fantasies.
It's strange that this wasn't mentioned in the thread, although it should have been.
User Avatar
#1453
Auto-translated
Nothing will happen.
Isn't that "the engineer's non-triggering condition"? We all agreed that "nothing will happen" = "no non-triggering condition will be used."

Added 1 minute later
And Revan asked the second time.
User Avatar
#1454
Auto-translated
And the third time, I asked.
Isn't this "the engineer's non-triggering ability not working"? We all decided that "nothing will happen" = "no non-triggering ability will be used."
Lol.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
In reply to Nyashechka Kavai
User Avatar
#1455
Auto-translated
And I, on the contrary, thought it was clear why it wasn't working.
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
User Avatar
#1456
Auto-translated
Generally speaking, it makes sense that, regarding the Scholar, the game master wouldn't try to specify whether it targets "only the first" or "only the second" target as a translation. But it probably would have been worth mentioning.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
User Avatar
#1457
Auto-translated
71:43 AM Leang: What happens if the effect of a redirect changes from an active unit to an inactive one?

81:45 AM WisTrit: If one is inactive, it won't work.
Here. And they also thought it would cause an "olololo-block." Because the question was about "redirecting from an active unit." And the answer was precisely "it won't work" :)
User Avatar
#1458
Auto-translated
I'll share my thoughts as well. The setting evokes pleasant feelings (which wasn't a surprise even before the game started) thanks to the attention to detail in all the roles and descriptions of events. But honestly, I'm not sure if introducing such a high level of difficulty with the clues was a good idea this time. As practice shows, it's precisely this high difficulty, combined with good presentation, that creates the most popular game setups. But on the other hand, take the clue about Lorelei and the dark knight – how could anyone even notice it against the backdrop of Spir, whose profile was completely filled with joker-related information? So, in the end, we were playing a psychological mafia game where we were only half-aware of what was happening. However, after the first execution, things became clearer. It's a shame it wasn't clear for everyone. Oh, these recurring mistakes. Okay, we failed twice, it's understandable that Plesen aroused suspicion (although I wasn't entirely sure about him), but what happened next? The next mafia elimination made me feel genuinely sorry for the town. Honestly, I just don't understand how inattentively you have to follow the game to make such a decision during the vote. I made a list, explained everything, and practically put it in their mouths, but in the end, they executed the wrong person again. Hostor mentioned that they should have somehow analytically justified his execution. But how can you prove that if he didn't even kill anyone? There's no way, you just have to pay close attention to how he reveals information known to the mafia in his reasoning. I understand that we were playing without clues, but the town really let us down. So, I'm glad that Void won, and I congratulate him.

За всем следят машины благодати и любви.
User Avatar
#1459
Auto-translated
Generally speaking, it makes sense that the game master wouldn't try to be overly specific and define "only the first" or "only the second" target as the translation for the scholar's ability. But it would have been good to mention it.
Never mind. But wouldn't the scholar's targets be passed on to another redirected unit? A double kill or double block would be amusing. I'm pretty sure there was a game that had that possibility.
User Avatar
#1460
Auto-translated
Okay, we failed twice, and Mold was raising suspicions (although I wasn't entirely sure about him), but what happened next? The next Mafia kill made me feel genuinely sorry for the town. Honestly, I just don't understand how you can be so out of touch with the game to make such a decision in a vote.
Which vote are you talking about? No one else was executed because the votes were tied. It wasn't possible to avoid executing someone. We just removed the immunity from Rimp and learned his role, which helped us in the future.

Be strong. Believe
User Avatar
#1461
Auto-translated
Well, never mind. But wouldn't the goals of one scientist be passed on to another redirected scientist? Double kill or double block – that would be fun. I'm sure there was a game with that feature.
I don't remember any games like that. I think there wasn't a goal swap before; instead, the Necromantic Disturbance itself was transferred. Wouldn't that be a bit UNBALANCED, don't you think? Although, compared to a triple voice on a Mage...
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.