Posts from Mafia: general discussions. Auto-translated

What other cohorts are there? And why are you involving random people? You're skillfully adding fuel to the fire.

Okay, fine, I like everyone on the forum equally, regardless of their position in these debates.

Omega is not among

Hostor, Slonysh, Guilford, Omega, Zubr, and their friends

Omega maintains a neutral stance among the Warlocks.

The elephant showed no disrespect to anyone.

Ololo.
No, I could elaborate, but why bother? Everyone already knows.

You said you were leaving? So what's the problem, why do you care about the current mafia? You only cause squabbles and all sorts of inappropriate bans because of your bad attitude.

Sorry, but I feel that giving you an extra 2-3 hours for discussion is too generous.
Although, if you want, as compensation I'll extend the next day by that amount.

Added after 1 minute
Gilford, what, is it better to fill the whole Mafia game with veterans, giving newcomers no chance?

"Extra hours"? Not my business since I don't play, but 24 hours are the legal hours for discussion, and even a single minute of them officially cannot be considered "extra" if even one of the players is against closing early.
I said nothing about "giving newcomers no chance." It's just that veterans, as a rule, play more actively. Therefore, the more newcomers there are, the lower the general activity will be, which is not good. But it's your game, run it how you want, and, in general, I wrote this only in the context of Vis's sharp response. Because there was constructive feedback, and he tried to make it seem non-existent.

Nebo, thanks, I love the whole Owl-like squad, and the pictures of them as well.

No, let's find that post, since the especially gifted have already forgotten its content.

Let's. I'll highlight the necessary point:

This isn't an official statement like "oh, I'm leaving the forum, and may you be ashamed!", I have no reasons to leave the forum – but playing Mafia here is pointless. Good luck.

Did you read this as "I won't write here anymore"? Or did you see an application for the game somewhere to say, "You said you wouldn't play, but you are playing"? Everything else you expected is your own conjecture.

I'll remain silent about constructiveness. If everything is ok in your opinion, it's useless to argue here. By the way, how you dragged Jose into this, who doesn't even play – great. I'm talking to you about the poor activity of a small part of current players, and you're talking to me about Jose. :/

What did I say that was so wrong? I asked a banal and very relevant question, isn't that so?

I don't remember sharpness ever being considered something banal and commonplace. Relevant? Is it relevant to be rude these days? Perhaps only in your social circle.

Who did I write the previous post for? Omega, for instance, though not delving into the essence, was still maximally neutral in his indignation, to which he received an answer. Which you ignored, and again you write about how everyone is bad and evil.

"Everyone" is bad and evil? "Proof it or you know who". And you wrote it for me as well. You wrote it publicly, so it was for me, for Omega, and for everyone else. Or do you only respond to posts that start with "WisTrit, ..."?

Should I go now... into the thread for the tournament of, say, the sixth part and start telling players what and how to do, why not? Or go into the Mass Effect 2 thread and say that everyone there is an idiot and a noob and does things poorly. How am I any worse than some people?

"Proof the moment with 'everyone is an idiot and a noob' or you know who".
By the way, I doubt you only voice opinions regarding the games you are currently playing. If you play tournaments for some part of Heroes for several months, after which you stop playing, but you develop an opinion on how to improve the conduct of those very tournaments, and you express your opinion, they won't tell you "who asked you?" just because you aren't playing at the moment.

Proof the insult, or you know who.

And did anyone ask you?

To say a phrase meaning that a specific person's opinion means nothing, to show your disrespect for that person's opinion = to show disrespect to the person.

Insult (iniuria of Roman law), as a private law tort, is any conscious unlawful action containing a manifestation of disrespect to another person.

Insults, trolling, and flame are "unlawful" on this forum; you show disrespect simply with such a sharp question, meaning that someone else's opinion does not interest you. Will you turn yourself in or pretend to be a psycho so that the action is considered unconscious?

Are you serious? Deleting a thread, awarding points for no reason, constant directions and remarks that are off-point, condemning others absolutely groundlessly. Her posts, by the way, can also be quite well broken down into quotes with indirect insults.

Not for no reason. On point. Having grounds. Try it, O person who is too lazy to grind the newspapers in Mafia, because the world doesn't end with Mafia. Even if your laziness suddenly evaporates in such an important life situation, you won't find what simply isn't there. And when you find something to nitpick, consider how many times more such moments for nitpicking can be found by analogy among your own posts. Only the nitpicks will remain nitpicks, heh.
Otherwise, this is called moderator activity, comrade moderator. By the way, moderator actions are also not supposed to be discussed. Just don't start the argument again about how everything was "for no reason" and "groundless" - I'm tired of discussing it. I've already understood that your opinion doesn't coincide with mine.

You just have a butthurt, it'll pass.

Ah, well okay, exactly. I'll just slam the door, since you think we're doing it anyway? (This means that for me personally, the conversation ends here, just so you know.)
*Slams the door and screams "Vissi is a fool".* :smile04:

"Vissy is an idiot."

So, who exactly called Slonik an idiot, or something similar, directly?
This is exactly the kind of behavior that should be rewarded with points.

I can issue a warning. Should I?

The quote from the wiki is ridiculous. If we follow it, a couple of people should have been banned a long time ago.

I can calculate it. Should I?

Don't follow his example.
Do you need popcorn?

The quote from the wiki is just ridiculous. If we follow it, a couple of people should have been banned a long time ago.

I agree. Let's ban half of the players. ^_________^

Ban me, but I'll take you with me into this abyss of silence... (c)

Depravado, give some if you don't mind! Otherwise, Drakko will eat it all.

ToX, I agree, let's move it to the next day (it's harder to coordinate during the week). Regarding closing the day, please refer to the game rules:

4. A day lasts exactly 24 hours. In extremely rare cases, the day may end earlier or later. Such cases are determined by the GM.

So, everything is within the rules. And in general, let's all get along. After all, we're playing for fun) (and what else are games for?).

But what else are games for?

Well, of course, to assert yourself, to show that you're better than others, to boost your ego – didn't you know? :)

Gilford, Delirious, and Leanna are actively involved in the development and discussion of the game with me and on the forum. I understand your point of view, but newcomers are also a good thing. Regarding the time limit, I agree, but overall, the trend wasn't constructive. The clues weren't deciphered, no one was really ready to execute anyone, and there wasn't an obvious suspect based on psychology or mathematics.

and they didn't let me prove myself, show my skills, and satisfy my ego =(

I wasn't given a chance to prove myself, show my skills, and boost my ego =(

Assign points and show who's who!