Posts from Mafia: general discussions. Auto-translated

Guys, I can play with three windows, and I have experience.

Actually, to put an end to this argument, I suggest the following.
Zubr, Vistrit, and Arandor can organize the games whenever and however they want.
Then we'll see how much time is left until December 28th.
And we'll decide if we have time to hold one or two more games, it doesn't matter.
Jack, I think you're a gentleman too, so if we don't have time, will we give way to Reinhard and Neyra?

I suggest running two or, at most, even three games simultaneously. This way, we can take a break of a week and a half after each game, avoid disrespecting anyone, and allow everyone who wants to participate to showcase their brilliant settings and delight the players.

Hmm... Why not?
Arch, shall we try running the games simultaneously?

I don’t think it’s worth it. There’s a high risk that one will fail because it won’t be able to gather enough players.

I might refuse to run my pre-New Year's game, but I will give negative ratings to Togz and the GM who takes my slot for every post in this thread. Plus, I'll tell Lorelei that he'll never see me as a GM again, and then he'll give you negative ratings along with me. Lorelei will ask Vish to help, and he will also give you negative ratings. I'll also talk to Hossi; he definitely won't refuse me. And finally, I'll call Morny, and he will also give you negative ratings.

This post is simply offensive. Not only is no one asking you to run a game, but you're also belittling newcomers and trying to decide for others? If I were in the place of any of the forum members mentioned in the quote, I would immediately give a negative rating. I advise those who have been subjected to this inappropriate behavior to do the same. I don't need to teach manners to ignorant people, so let's be compassionate towards the person who can't control their angry emotions.
Moreover, there will be no negative ratings; resolve disputes with dignity, not by resorting to threats. For those who initiate similar threats, I promise to use heavy artillery in the form of clones, up to -100 per day.
So, let's follow the chronological order of game submissions; skipping ahead should only be done by agreement. By the way, I think we need a break between games now and in the future, about 3-5 days. So, it would be better to run 4 games before the New Year and start a large New Year's game around the 27th, which will last through the holidays.

I won't be hosting a game, so don't bother. Besides, I'm planning a [game+story+contest] pack for the end of December.
However, I think it's not a good idea to set a specific date for a Mafia game when there's a queue. And besides, one of the games that has already started might "be delayed" and spill over from December to January, and taking a long break just because someone has reserved a spot for a specific date doesn't seem very logical.

it's not practical to set a specific date for a Mafia game when there's a queue.

KIND PEOPLE, I'M ON THE LIST!

lol, what a mess, I've never seen so many people wanting to be a GM. Are you all bored of playing? Let's play something else -)

Come on, enough with the drama and arguments all over the forum. Everyone already knows that this order doesn't really mean much, because someone will inevitably be unable to play, someone won't want to, and others will simply decide to give up their spot to someone who wants it more.

Yes, by the way, mention somewhere that if the GM doesn't have 10 free days, they shouldn't run the game.
P.S. Tox, I was wrong about Colt's patent being your birthday gift.

Oh my god, what an impatient crowd. The GM hasn't even had time to post the setting, and people are already jumping in between his posts.

I knew in advance that there would be a set) I thought I should already reserve a number)

knew in advance that there would be a set) thought I should already reserve a number)

Yes, even if it wasn't in advance. :) The GM didn't have time to post the second message with role descriptions, and you were already here. Terrible! :smile13:

:smile01:
Damn, that host touched upon the theme of my topic...