Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
It seemed like I had explained everything. It seemed like the previous nights had been analyzed in every detail. And here's what it all came down to, what we had been working towards for so long. An anal clown show. Hostor, who did you leave me with?..
Yes, I was wrong about the blacksmith. Don't block her, because you can't block the Templar anyway.
Morni, go ahead, you've wanted to burn this scoundrel for a long time, because he's been a "mafioso from the very beginning," and, strangely enough, I now share your point of view.
I'm executing Taco today. Here's a good target for you: a hundred percent mafia member, a heretic, bribed by a Jew, and enjoys watching sunrises. There's nothing to discuss here.
TaKo doesn't log into the forum, lol. Why would you want to execute her? Also, she's an Huntress. Because she's not an Inquisitor, not a Bishop, not an Executioner, not a Count, not a Knight, not a Blacksmith, not a Moneylender, not a Thief, not a Templar. That leaves Huntress and Mage, but Mages wander around and kill, so TaKo is likely a Huntress. Why would you want to kill a Huntress?
Added after 12 minutes you're just whining. Didn't vote against Vis. And didn't react to my message at all. The whole game was like that. He just agreed with Gil-Mafu and ignored everyone else. I don't even know if I should eliminate you today or wait until after Vis.
Everything has already been explained to you above, and throughout the last twenty pages. I know that schoolchildren don't like to read, but this is not one of those cases.
And of course, I won't vote against Vis. Why would I? Why should I vote against him? Explain.
morning, again, a big plus. I really like the game.
Now, to the point: I suggest we execute the Templar now because, as I understand it, you want to either hang him or kill him at night and find another Mafia member, but the Templars will survive peacefully until the end. That's not an option. I suggest executing the Templar, specifically Imaris (I'm not entirely sure, but he looks very, very suspicious).
At night, if they don't kill Taco, then block and kill him, and it won't be difficult to find a Mafia member with such a small number of players. Personally, I'm confident in winning the game with this strategy.
But NO! The Marshal can steal a vote. So, with the Hermit, the Templars will have +4 in the vote! Oh my god. Let's hang the Hermit and let Imaris go unprotected at night. (I hope Taco will kill him).
I'll be back in the evening. I hope you support my brilliant idea.
EXECUTE THE HERMIT
Okay, I agree. I was also thinking about that after rereading the rules and seeing that the blacksmith won't be able to block the marshal. I'm withdrawing my temporary vote – rescind the execution of Taco, execute Hermit. The marshal will have an interesting choice, but not enough to win the game.
You've already been explained everything above, and throughout the last twenty pages. I know that schoolchildren don't like to read, but this is not the case.
Indeed, this is not the case; trolling is completely inappropriate in Mafia. I have read your arguments on the last twenty pages.
And of course, I won't vote against Vis. Why? Why should I vote against him? Explain.
He's "Mafia from the first post!" He's not the Inquisitor (the Inquisitor was checked on the first night, and Vis was blocked), not the Bishop (that's Ples), not the Executioner (that's Slonysh), not the Count (that's Neyra), not the Knight (that's Hermit), not the Overlord (he was blocked when the Overlord burned Arandor), not the Moneylender (he was blocked when the Moneylender bribed Gil), not the Thief (that's Ling), not the Magician (that's Eaves), not the Marshal (that's Kitz), not the Prior (that's Amko), not the Necromancer (because he was his victim), and therefore, not the Occultist. But I noticed my huge mistake - he could be the Blacksmith. Cancel VisTrit's execution.
Added 2 minutes ago On the other hand, he is acting like a Mafia member. As is Morny, who could be the Inquisitor, Overlord, Moneylender, or Demon. I'm completely confused -_-
He's not Ink (Ink was checked on the first night, and Vis was blocked), not OnV (he was blocked when OnV burned Arandor), not the Marshal (that's Kitz). But I noticed my own blunder – he could be the Blacksmith.
Hmm... wasn't he blocked by a Warlock? So, the Warlock acts after the Hunter and after the Inquisitor, meaning Vis could have done his job, and then he was blocked. That's not enough for me to be sure of his innocence, but first, I'd like to get rid of the Templars. And also... why am I the Marshal???)))) Because of the protection? I've been suspected of this for 2 days, and I decided to defend myself to attract even more suspicion? That would be too stupid. It's just a setup. The Templar is clever...