Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Yes, guys, I also think that judging based on the Night Watch results is more reliable. If we take the newspaper analysis as an example, there was no Gur, and there was no blacksmith's move. No, I'm not excusing him, but I'm explaining why I'm leaning towards the second option. There's no absolute certainty anywhere, but it's less in some places and more in others.
And you're hurting my feelings with the note; haven't you recognized my style yet? It was a day off, and I was looking for clues because I had the opportunity – I wasn't busy. I guess I just made a mistake with the clue about you.
Your style can indeed be imitated. A paragraph or two, and maybe even a signature. So, don't take it personally. And the games show that judging by the style of writing a note is ineffective; cunning players like to imitate someone or, conversely, write in a completely neutral tone. Werolom
I've made my choice. Execute Gur.
As if you would execute yourself if there were no other options!
And I won't execute Gur. Gur isn't going anywhere. I will execute Wishmaster based on the reasons described above and in previous posts. And I won't be surprised if a nice little connection between Aves, Kitz, and Wish is suddenly revealed. Synchronous posting, no suspicion of each other, synchronous visits to the off-topic section under the guise of "well, since we're together, let's just chat in the forum."
yes, Wish might turn out to be just a moneylender from the peaceful roles, based on the Night Watch order. So what? What if on the first night he went to Taco, bribed her, and then his Night Watch result was stolen. On the second night, the thief with Wish's Night Watch result went to Gil and bribed him. That's possible, right?
No. That's NOT possible because the thief goes before the moneylender. "The only possible role from the peaceful ones," and it's not Wishmaster. What are your actions?
Yes, guys, I also think that judging based on the night phase is more reliable. If we take the newspaper analysis as an example, there was no mention of Gura, and there was no mention of the blacksmith's move. No, I'm not excusing him, but I'm explaining why I'm leaning towards the second option. There's no absolute certainty anywhere, but it's less in some places and more in others.
Your style can indeed be imitated. A paragraph or two, and possibly a signature. So, don't take it personally. And the games show that judging based on the writing style of a note is ineffective; cunning players like to imitate someone, or, on the contrary, they try their best to write in a neutral tone.
It's as if you would execute yourself if there were no other options!
But I won't execute Gura. Gura isn't going anywhere. I will execute Wishmaster based on the considerations described above and in previous posts. And I won't be surprised at all if a nice little trio of Aves-Kits-Wish is suddenly revealed. Synchronous posting, no suspicion of each other, synchronous visits to the off-topic section with the excuse of "well, since we're together, let's have some fun on the forum."
No. That's NOT possible, because the thief goes before the moneylender. "The only possible role among the villagers," and it's not Wishmaster. What are your actions?
Well, you say that Kits and Wish are in the same group as me, okay, let's assume that, but what am I supposed to accuse Kits of now if I don't see any evidence against her? I think it's stupid. I'm wary of Gil's behavior, so I don't trust his judgments.
Что такое осень - это небо Плачущее небо под ногами
Heh, Aves, let's say my behavior worries you. But what worries me now is your ignoring Morny's argument. His question for Kitz can also be addressed to you. "What are you doing?" Good night, everyone.
Even if we fight, even if there’s such thing I will not give up Just like this, I won't let go Strongly grasping your right hand’s warmth I’ll be here
And in general, why doesn't anyone notice the strange interaction between Gill and TaKo? It's quite possible that they are on the same team as Leang, because Leang immediately agreed to execute Vish (without any justification), and TaKo's posts are uncharacteristic of her (compare them to her usual posts, where you can see the diversity of emotions, and as a result, many exclamation marks and so on; moreover, the style is far from hers and generally stands out). In my opinion, there is a connection with Gill. Moreover, Gill writes strange things that are not logical for the town; for example, he threatens to eliminate all the Templars, but eliminating them means losing, who will resurrect the dead townspeople? In general, think about it, okay? I can withdraw my vote and execute Vish, but think again, townspeople. Will the story with Neyra repeat itself?
Что такое осень - это небо Плачущее небо под ногами
for example, he threatens to eliminate all the Templars, and eliminating them means losing – who will resurrect the dead citizens?
Templars will not resurrect dead citizens. Templars will resurrect and protect each other until the town puts up enough Mafia, and the Mafia kills the town.
No. That's not possible, because the Thief goes before the Moneylender. "The only possible role among the townspeople," and it's not the Vigilante. What are your actions?
Because I don't want to lose another townsperson due to a foolish mistake, you've decided that we're in the first group? That's a very rash decision. And why did you decide that the Vigilante can only have one townsperson role? I asked Nebo... according to him, the Thief can steal Night's Defense from those who go before and after him. That is, from everyone? There's still time to try to figure it out better. I'll vote a little later, when you explain to me why the Vigilante can only have one townsperson role - the Moneylender. If that's really the case, then my decision will be against him.
What do I need to justify? There are two plausible versions, one with minimal error, the other with a certain risk of being wrong. I will naturally choose the first one.
and as a result, many exclamation marks and other things
I don't know about the rest, but this is very, very characteristic of her. In any case, she puts hundreds of exclamation marks whether playing as a townsperson or as a mafia member.
I don't want to lose another one, especially someone who seems peaceful, due to stupidity. Did you decide that we're in the first link?
After losing three town members? Yes.
And why did you decide that Vish can only have one peaceful role? Explain to me why Vish can only have one peaceful role - the moneylender.
Those were your words. >Yes, Vish can only be the moneylender out of the peaceful roles, based on the night order. So what?
I asked Nebo... according to him, the Thief can steal night actions from those who go before and after him. That is, from everyone?
Probably. Why not. But the moneylender goes after the thief, and if Vishmaster were the moneylender, he wouldn't be able to act in the first night - to bribe TaKo. The thief goes earlier and therefore steals the night action earlier than it can be used.
Those are your words. >yes, Vish might turn out to be just a moneylender from the peaceful roles, based on the order of the Night Phase. So what?
Probably. Why not. But the moneylender goes after the thief, and if Vishmaster were a moneylender, he wouldn't be able to go in the first night – to bribe TaCo. The thief goes earlier and therefore steals the Night Phase before it can be used.
I wrote my post before I asked the GM a question.
You're saying that Vish might not be just a moneylender, but then the probability that you made the right decision regarding his execution decreases sharply, doesn't it?
Templars won't resurrect dead townspeople. Templars will resurrect and protect each other until the town puts up enough Mafia, and the Mafia kills the town.
It makes sense, but isn't it necessary to resurrect townspeople just so that the Town can resist the Mafia? Wouldn't that benefit the Templars, because if the Mafia wins, the Town loses, and consequently, the Templars...
Что такое осень - это небо Плачущее небо под ногами
You say that Vish might turn out to be not just a moneylender, but then the probability that you made the right decision regarding his execution decreases sharply. Isn't that right?
I'm saying he's a witch. All other attempts to interpret my words in some twisted way are your bluff. The probability that he is a witch is higher than the probability that Gur is a demon worshiper, and you can't give one group an advantage over the other, so executing him today is a higher priority. That's all I have to say.
Logically, shouldn't we resurrect the townspeople just so that the Town can resist the Mafia? This would benefit the Templars, because if the Mafia wins, the Town loses, and consequently, the Templars...
Well, I hope they will show some sense and resurrect, for example, the executioner-Slonysh, and they will defend not only themselves, otherwise they will have a hard time, Gil generally described the scheme well.
I would like to hear a clear and absolutely specific answer to the question: Why can Vish not be: Blacksmith, Inquisitor, Marshal, Magister? And it's suspicious, first they said that he could only have one peaceful role, and now they suddenly agreed that no, not one, but no one gives a specific answer. Personally, I had enough of one Neyra, whom the mafia executed, and some townspeople, out of stupidity.
Что такое осень - это небо Плачущее небо под ногами
Happy Life
Dgak
