Skip to content

Posts from Sacred Haven of Debauchery Auto-translated

4.3 (23 ratings)
Closed
What shall we name the establishment?
28 voters
Single choice Public votes
This poll is closed.
“Flooding.” Simple and effective
17.9% 5 votes
Leave it as is – “Fludnyak”
7.1% 2 votes
“A den of debauchery.” How original!
39.3% 11 votes
Brewery
17.9% 5 votes
Another option (specify in the subject line)
17.9% 5 votes
User Avatar
#36367
Auto-translated
after all, gargoyles are supposed to be strong creatures and generally quite impressive.
They are only half a meter tall.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
User Avatar
#36368
Auto-translated
No, they are tall.

Be strong. Believe
User Avatar
#36369
Auto-translated
No, those weren't the large gargoyles that everyone was talking about. These are figurines half a meter tall.

Added 1 minute ago
Perhaps the realism in the size of the fifth-tier structures is one of the factors that attracts me.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
User Avatar
#36370
Auto-translated
Dr. House, if I'm not mistaken? I've never watched it.
House? I wouldn't recommend watching it. It's not bad, but it's not particularly good either. The theme of diseases is not well developed, and the structure of the episodes is practically the same. So, House's fame is greatly exaggerated.
In reply to Ple-Sen
User Avatar
#36371
Auto-translated
Is the theme of illnesses explored weakly? Oh, I agree. The praise for House is by no means exaggerated; the first seasons are very good.
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
User Avatar
#36372
Auto-translated
Is the topic of illnesses not explored in sufficient detail? Oh, come on.
I watched it with a doctor, so I know what I'm talking about. And it focuses more on the psychology of the patients than on their physical ailments.
The praise for House is not exaggerated; the early seasons are very good.
I don't know which seasons are good, but the series doesn't appeal to me. Maybe I just got unlucky with the episodes, but I didn't see any compelling reasons to watch this series.
In reply to Ple-Sen
User Avatar
#36373
Auto-translated
Ple-Sen
I wouldn't recommend watching House. It's not bad, but it's not particularly good either. The theme of illnesses is poorly developed, and the structure of the episodes is practically the same. So, House's fame is greatly exaggerated.
As far as I know, people watch House for its cynical antics and its unique, distinctive character, not for the "theme of illnesses." I haven't watched a single episode myself, and I don't plan to in the near future (and I haven't watched Lost either, what a heretic I am).
Армия баранов под предводительством льва сильнее армии львов под предводительством барана.

God save us everyone
Will we burn inside the fires of a thousand suns...
In reply to Ple-Sen
User Avatar
#36374
Auto-translated
I'm a doctor myself, everything is fine there :cool:
Do you need detailed information about diseases? You should read medical books in that case, not watch TV series.
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
User Avatar
#36375
Auto-translated
Do you need detailed information about diseases? In that case, you should read medical books, not watch TV series.
Well, many people praised it, including for its portrayal of diseases, at least those I've seen (and those who recommended it to me), which is why I mentioned this aspect, because it's not as well-developed as they say. I personally decided to watch it for the humor of the main character, but there isn't that much humor, and the episodes follow a similar pattern.
In reply to Ple-Sen
User Avatar
#36376
Auto-translated
I didn't notice the "humor" either, but House is a funny guy.
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
User Avatar
#36377
Auto-translated
but House is a funny guy.
Well, I agree with that.
In reply to Ple-Sen
User Avatar
#36378
Auto-translated
Ple-Sen
I watched it with a doctor, so I know what I'm talking about.

Sorry for butting in. I'm not a fan of House myself.
But I remember that about two years ago, some colleagues at work were really into it.
There was an English-language forum where real doctors discussed the episodes in detail. And about 50% of what's in the show is medically accurate.

I don't know which seasons you watched with the doctor (and why only with one :)), but here's some more information.

В тихой однообразной жизни всегда так бывает: каждый отдельный день бесконечно долог, но месяцы и годы мчатся с непостижимой быстротой.

I wanted to offer you some flowers, but a crown would suit a princess like you much better

Смысл жизни в том, что жизнь на тебе не заканчивается
User Avatar
#36379
Auto-translated
Roughly 50% of the medical aspects in the film are accurate.
For a series that dedicates a significant amount of time to medicine and patient treatment, this is quite a low percentage.
User Avatar
#36380
Auto-translated
I don't see what makes the first seasons better than the later ones, considering the entire series is essentially the same.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
User Avatar
#36382
Auto-translated
At least because, at the beginning, it doesn't have time to become monotonous.
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made