Posts from Mafia 26. Lady Mallowen's Last Caprice Auto-translated

Yeah, I didn't mention a specific block, so what? I also didn't mention the cook's pie. It's getting ridiculous. And you don't need to address me while commenting on the Mafia notes.
And your version about the postman and the detective is kind of weak. I wouldn't trust it.

Dear citizens, to avoid a repeat of yesterday's situation, please vote to execute Ar as soon as you see the option. While searching for clues about the other murderers, we risk losing votes again – some will go to sleep, others will be absent due to personal circumstances, etc. Once we find Jane, we'll change the votes. But for now... Execute Arandor.

Added 2 minutes later
Ar, sorry – I haven't identified any other mafia members yet, so I'm addressing you personally. Don't be upset; we'll get to the others eventually. :)

If I were a Mafia member, I would kill you and not even worry about it. Or maybe it's Haven, who always votes against me.

If I were a Mafia player, I would...

Something like this shouldn't even be considered. It's the same as saying, "I can't play as Mafia for the fourth time in a row!"

Yeah, you're such a fool to just kill one of the two players who voted for your execution the very next night after the accusations against you.

Well, it seems everyone is against me =( did they conspire or something?

Added 1 minute later

Yeah, because you're so smart that you'd just kill one of the two players who voted for your execution the very next night after the accusations against you.

You know, sometimes it's the best solution, because people, just like you, will think that the Mafia wouldn't just kill someone who accused their accomplice. I've done something similar before. But overall, I agree with Ling, of course; I wrote this more as a joke than seriously.

No, you just made a mistake, esteemed opponents. Did anyone notice that I forgot to mention the third action of the Mafia in my lengthy post? There were two logical options for the third action: 1. Removing protection from Flandre, who was attacked. 2. Redirecting the killer's target to an undesirable player. Since the protection wasn't removed – there weren't even any remotely similar phrases in the newspaper – this leaves us with the second option. There are two possible scenarios here. They kept the Registrar blocked to redirect the killer to him, or they kept him blocked to prevent him from interfering with another kill, redirecting the killer to another undesirable player. Apparently, to me. So, Ar, you shouldn't say that you could have easily killed me – you wanted to. Oh yes, sorry, it wasn't just you – it was your entire group. And the first scenario is ruled out – the Mafia wouldn't personally kill their own puppet. They made a mistake about who the killer was. It was a very nice mistake. And that was your downfall. You not only failed to do the most important thing for you at this stage (correctly identifying the clues about the killer for subsequent use in your own purposes), but you also accidentally killed the real killer. And yes, I didn't say that I based the above solely on the logic of "it's dangerous to immediately kill those who accuse" – as you can see, I believe that my death simply didn't happen.

Yeah, the mafia are very stupid and it's unclear why they sent a player (I doubt they were sure) to kill the main problem, while they themselves go to kill the Investigator? It would be more logical to do the opposite, but here, yes, it's a clever plan. They need the mafia to kill the problem, otherwise the townspeople will think Gil was right. A very clever plan, really clever, so they need to take such a risk for it. Right?)) Hmm, you're clearly not a very good mafia player.

Added 1 minute ago
You know, these are just assumptions and speculations, and they shouldn't be added to the list of accusations.

but the maffs switched to Sky, who tried to eat me and let me stay overnight. Hungry and barely escaped.

It seems someone wants me to stay over at their place. :)
Execute Arandor.

Everything is going so smoothly; they're carrying out executions based on a note from a dead postman, which Gill interpreted as a quote from a book, and yet after the murders, there's a ton of evidence available that no one is even trying to decipher. Very sensible. The city is still a herd of sheep, just as it always was, right?)

Yeah, the mafia are very stupid and they send some random player (I doubt they were sure) to kill the main thorn in their side, while they themselves go to kill the Registrar? It would be more logical to do the opposite, but here, yes, it's a clever plan. They need the mafia to kill the thorn, otherwise the townspeople will think that Gil was right. Very clever plan, extremely clever, so they need to take such a risk for it. Right?)) Hmm, you're clearly not a very good mafia player.

Added 1 minute ago
You know, these are just speculations, and you shouldn't attribute them as a "+" in the accusations.

Don't be offended, but your recent actions were really not the best. If you haven't noticed, I was trying to find the mafia and execute him first. You could have perfectly executed everything through the mafia, and then justified everything with the logic "he was too insistent on getting rid of the mafia and paid for it." Why did you have to kill me yourself when you had such an opportunity? I understand that you won't admit your mistake now, because that would be the same as surrendering. And I don't expect that - I want to win the battle completely.

Speculations are speculations, I don't care much about what you say. Give your last instructions to your accomplices, share your thoughts... And prepare to meet death with honor.

Added 1 minute ago
So, you already agree that the postman is dead? And you said that my version about the detective and the postman was wrong... I mean, you said it was "weak."

According to you, he is dead, and that is what was meant. This is the beginning of your interpretation of the postman's note.

Okay. Let me rephrase. Yesterday, you at least tried to refute my version with some arguments. Today, besides saying "weak," you have nothing to add, as I see. I thought Ar wouldn't back down from a debate...

Why did you kill me with your own hands when you had such an opportunity?

What opportunity?)

Hmm, I was describing the same possibility – using mana for one's own purposes. And what, did I make a mistake somewhere, and are you saying that you didn't have such an option after all?