Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Discussion about the Stronghold faction.
By the time of the fifth installment, they had become leaner and more slender.
And also, these cyclops don't have hooves. And the cyclops from Dark Messiah don't have hooves, or even horns.
However, considering that all orcs are mutants, such variability is probably acceptable. The cyclops looks good.
O God of Earth and Altar, Bow down and hear our cry, Our earthly rulers falter, Our people drift and die, The walls of gold entomb us, The swords of scorn divide, Take not thy thunder from us, Take away our pride.
It seems so, but I can't quite imagine how, for example, an archer or a maniac would break down a wall. Drakkosha
In the fourth game? Did Cyclops destroy walls? O_o
More likely, they destroyed gates.
Достоинство человека определяется тем, каким путем он идет к цели, а не тем, достигнет ли он ее.;) Демократия есть одурачивание народа при помощи народа ради блага народа.(Уайльд Оскар)
I hate to disappoint you, but even a hero could kick the gates in the fourth game.
Heh, it's actually more interesting this way than if every Cyclops was identical.
Actually, the Cyclops from the sixth game reminds me of those cute, fluffy hippos.
Here. A more tactically astute person, it's immediately obvious. And what you have
is just an excuse for using primitive, uninspired "tactics." You'll also tell us how you replay battles in single-player, calling it skillful command of troops. "In real life, no one would send warriors into attack without предварительной reconnaissance!"
If this "primitive, uninspired "tactic"" helps me defeat a "tactically astute" opponent, then it doesn't matter what he calls it. I still win, and he's left frustrated. By the way, surrounding archers on all sides with melee units is also a form of reconnaissance.
Армия баранов под предводительством льва сильнее армии львов под предводительством барана.
God save us everyone Will we burn inside the fires of a thousand suns...
In general, the six-legged cyclops reminds me of those cute, fluffy hippos.
But in my opinion, it doesn't look like it, at least not fluffy:D Centaur Abilities:
A regular centaur (male or female) behaves the same way as in "Heroes of Might and Magic V": it moves away from the attacker and shoots at it. However, the upgraded centaur (male or female) gains an ability: it can either move first and then shoot, or shoot first and then move (that is, it gets two turns in one compared to regular ranged units).
The upgraded version has a good ability; they developed the ability of the unupgraded version.
Достоинство человека определяется тем, каким путем он идет к цели, а не тем, достигнет ли он ее.;) Демократия есть одурачивание народа при помощи народа ради блага народа.(Уайльд Оскар)
The game hasn't even been released yet, but I've already decided on my favorite unit.
I've always wanted it to be possible in Heroes of Might and Magic to move away in one turn and attack from a distance.
Haha, centaur-zebras. The developers finally remembered about the fourth game, but unfortunately, they also remembered its flaws. I never liked the elven hero riding a zebra.
Shamans, like in many games, are hunched over and look like old men. In the third game, they were younger and different from the other shamans in the game.
As for the warriors, they resemble the same ghouls (and their brethren), but they are larger and thicker. Yes, this prediction about ghouls continues to hold true.
so that in Heroes of Might and Magic, you could move away in one turn and attack from a distance.
Like in Diablo 3 and King's Bounty, only there it's part of the mechanics.
Added 4 minutes later Morning
Kiting neutral creatures with a stack of centaurs without losses!
That would be great, but it only works against warriors, not against archers and mages. Although, it depends on what the penalty for ranged attacks is in the game.
Достоинство человека определяется тем, каким путем он идет к цели, а не тем, достигнет ли он ее.;) Демократия есть одурачивание народа при помощи народа ради блага народа.(Уайльд Оскар)
Yes, it turned out quite interesting, better than in the second part, where the cyclops doesn't look like a cyclops at all. And doesn't the cyclops from the 6th game have the burrowing ability? His hands look strange...
Достоинство человека определяется тем, каким путем он идет к цели, а не тем, достигнет ли он ее.;) Демократия есть одурачивание народа при помощи народа ради блага народа.(Уайльд Оскар)
Oh, mother earth, father sky, what have you done to the enhanced cyclops??? What difficult fate caused horns to grow out of its back :D??
The rest turned out fine. I like the shamans and jaguar warriors less, but overall, the orcs look decent and natural. And the zebrokent is something else :). But, as I said, they look beautiful and original.
P.S.: When seeing ghouls, tormentors, maniacs, and enhanced cyclops, enemies will writhe in disgust and be forced out of battle :D.
In my dream, the centaurs were better, even though they were vomiting. And the cyclops look similar to those in Heroes of Might and Magic V. There's almost no difference, at least in the top-down view.
Happy Life
=Feel999=
