Posts from Мафия 23. The Rockland tavern

What are you doing, lone maniac?:confused: When a clue is provided, it's provided INSTEAD of one of the two, or in addition to the only one.

If the murder was unsuccessful, the murderer will find out, but won't know why it was unsuccessful. Unsuccessful murders don't provide clues, except for those that the murderer claims himself.

A burned body is not a clue, but a method of murder. You wouldn't consider chopped-up pieces a clue, would you?

Hunting the hunter. Any thoughts?

It seems that, in his joy that the client is dead, he forgets everything and loses these extra clues.

The clue is right there: a burned body and ashes... think about who this might point to:rolleyes:

It's actually quite simple: Hos is dead, meaning the hunter is dead. Two assassins came to him at once, meaning there was a hunt for the hunter... it's really simple.

You know, in real life, you can lose evidence in the heat of the moment. But in a game, a person has to hit their head hard on a cabinet to, in a fit of joy, provide evidence against themselves!

Either against you or against the Warlock. Or against you, the Warlock. If it's possible that an unsuccessful assassin left evidence behind, then you could have been the Warlock who arrived after the Warrior. You burned everything around and left...to take a shower. :D

Why is Hos a hunter?

Question for the GM!

What about evidence for an unsuccessful murder? How should we deal with the rule "no more than three" if there is already evidence on the body from, say, a more successful assassin?

Clues about the killers are given in the reports based on the user's profile (nickname, avatar, signature, etc.). If the murder was unsuccessful, the killer will find out, but will not find out why it was unsuccessful. No evidence is given for unsuccessful murders, except for what the killer claims. The reports also contain a hint about the role of the deceased. Hints about the role of the killer are given in any case.

Personally, I think NNV is right. And yes, Arandor is actively promoting the idea that Kyle is a maniac...

If you think a Warlock committed the murder, you are greatly mistaken, as he arrives after the mana phase.

I did write that the Warlock could have arrived after the Warrior and found that his victim was already killed. But since such actions are worth mentioning in the "newspaper," there are signs of fire on the body - but they burned the already dead body, or rather, its pieces.:smile04: "And here's some shish kebab for you?"

Execute Kyle

Execute Kyle
I think he's negative. And he wants to destroy the world - I can't allow that.

Execute Deriel_Linch
I think he's a negative influence. And he wants to destroy the world - I can't allow that.
:D

I think it's pretty clear who did what during the night. But I believe Kyle is a player we shouldn't eliminate early on. The probability that he will eliminate the Mafia is quite high. They will at least be wary! Therefore, my vote today is NNV. But we can always execute him later...

P.S. And Hos was clearly a Paladin, so we're going to have another maniac (Ranger)... Alas... :(