Auto-translated
I have a simple solution to the problem: ALL MEMBERS OF OUR CLAN SHOULD PUT ANDREY ON IGNORE, and then neither we will see his humor, nor he will see our messages.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
This won't solve the problem. If you really want to have three "eagles" instead of two, PLEASE! Be my guest! I just realized that no one has thought about the fact that reputation is not just badges; reputation needs to be EARNED!!! It was good at the beginning. If someone gave useful advice on how to complete a level or shared a helpful link, they would get a plus. Now, everyone is just giving each other "pluses" and "minuses" over trivial things. "HAHA! You really nailed it! Here's a plus for your reputation!"
REMOVE THE REPUTATION SYSTEM AND BE DONE WITH IT!!! Over all this time, no one, including me, has learned how to use it properly.
the topic spawned another conflict
It's not about Andrew, understand!
Let's just ban and ignore everyone who disapproves of anyone! And everyone will be HAPPY!!! And those who are not HAPPY, we will force them to be HAPPY or ban them too! And then we will have HAPPINESS!:mad::D:mad:
Then we need to remove the cause of this conflict - REPUTATION.
My messages are not ambiguous, I just didn't immediately understand the basic truth.
Then, we need to eliminate the cause of this conflict – REPUTATION...
Maybe then you'll send me a private message about a certain topic?
2 Prorock
Let's talk...
As you know, due to the nature of my work, I must prevent flame wars.
According to the rules of our forum (http://www.forum.heroesworld.ru/faq.php?faq=hw_help#faq_hw_help_rules), flooding is prohibited.
("Flooding - (English: flood), repeatedly posting identical or nearly identical messages.")
You posted your message, which, by the way, was quite interesting, a significant number of times, thus violating the rules. This led to me giving you a disapproval. I also gave a disapproval when one of your posts in the Clans topic was dedicated to comparing different versions of Heroes. This message was not related to the stated topic and, according to the forum rules, is considered off-topic ("Off-topic - any network message that goes beyond the pre-established topic of communication.").
All the quotes I provided are from the forum rules, a link to which is provided above.
Thus, my disapprovals were not directed at you personally or at the content of your posts, but at the fact that it violates the rules.
After receiving a private message from you, to put it mildly, of not entirely appropriate content, I was surprised. By the way, when one of the former newcomers, now my good friend, received a disapproval from me (it was off-topic), he calmly wrote to me, asking why he received this disapproval. We sorted it out, and there were no more questions.
As you can see, even after this strange incident, I approved one of your messages.
I would like to clarify the situation at the moment...