Posts from Information for moderators.

Both players receive a demerit for their behavior. However, it was a legitimate victory, even if such "victories" don't improve skills:smile48:. readme is incorrect in claiming he left the game simply because he felt like it (and the road speed, logic, and the fact that it happened during the opponent's turn are not excuses!). Weber is wrong from a moral standpoint for posting such a "victory" (although I'm not without sin myself; I've posted losses from the first week, it happens...). He's also wrong for resorting to personal attacks and insults, even though the situation was conducive to profanity, but the ability to control oneself hasn't been revoked. I suggest the opponents record a draw in that game, virtually shake hands, and start a new one, after agreeing on the roads and other nuances beforehand.

Well, that's all there is to it!

It's easy for both of them, that's all :))

AHAHA)))) a great solution!

Neither of the arguing players deserves credit for their behavior. But still, it was a legitimate victory, even if such "victories" don't improve skills:smile48:. readme is wrong in saying that he left the game simply because he felt like it (and the speed of the roads, the logic, and the fact that it happened during the opponent's turn are not excuses!). And Weber is wrong from a moral point of view for posting such a "victory" (although I'm not without sin myself, I sometimes post replays of losses from the first week, it happens...). He is also wrong for resorting to personal attacks, insults, etc., even though the situation was conducive to using profanity, but the ability to control oneself has not been canceled. I suggest that the opponents record a draw in that game, virtually shake hands, and start a new one, after agreeing on the roads and other nuances.

........+1

........+1

What's with the draw? Either don't count the game in the season, or follow the rules.

and what kind of defeat could it be, considering the opponent's experience and mine? He has only two weeks of experience!

readme

Registered: 04/13/2010
Location: USA
Posts: 23

Your statements don't quite add up. :)
Especially considering participation in the novice tournament...

readme

Registration: 04/13/2010
Address: USA
Posts: 23

Your statements don't quite add up :)
especially considering participation in the novice tournament...

Don't worry, Dimych, it might be someone's clone exposing themselves - don't interfere, let them fully compromise themselves:D.

Why a draw? Either don't count the game in the season, or follow the rules.

Well, yes... +1 was more about a reasonable assessment of the behavior given by KostyaN.
I would suggest this:
option 1) replay
option 2) if any of the opponents are not happy with option 1 (no time, don't want to play with such a jerk) - don't post it at all ("don't count the game in the season")
option 3) if any of the opponents are not happy with option 2 - then be literal ("follow the rules") - until the readme...

option 3) if any of the opponents are not satisfied with war. 2) - then a stickler for the rules ("according to the rules") - until the readme...

Logically, it might be possible, but I don't think it's realistic. If we're going to be completely strict, all controversial situations should be resolved by the tournament organizer. Here, there was clearly a controversial situation. If Weber had silently sent the saves and logs to the organizer, then yes, refer to the readme. But as it is, the match should be annulled, and both players should receive a warning. Reading the logs was both funny and disgusting at the same time.

readme - I think such behavior should be punished so that it doesn't happen again - a penalty in the form of awarding the victory of this match to his opponent is quite sufficient!

Someone here wrote that I'm a clone. I'll address you this way: according to you, can't a person come from another portal, having played there before under a different nickname, to this portal and play? Why is this action considered "cloning" by you? I'm sure some of you have also played on another portal before, and then came here, and some, quite possibly, under different nicknames. Were you also clones then? Regarding our game with Weber, I no longer care about its outcome, because factors such as the following are important: 1. Weber has created an image for himself, one that is ready to accept undeserved and unfair victories for the sake of ranking. I haven't seen a more unfair defeat than this. Let all the players on the HW portal know what Weber is capable of and how he achieves his statistics. Respect is more valuable than any ranking, which means absolutely nothing on any portal. 2. The game didn't take place, and nothing in it suggested that Weber would win against me. It was a clear free win, from which Weber will not learn anything and will not gain any experience. As for me, I don't like winning like that, and I have never posted victories of this kind, because it's not a victory based on the mechanics of the game, it's a refusal to play on my part. And I am very surprised that this kind of action is encouraged by many players on this portal, and most importantly, Weber himself does not do it spontaneously. 3. Weber insulted me and violated my rights by not asking a single word about the report, but simply wrote "confirm it." For this alone, if I were a judge, I would consider some arguments about this player, regarding his future games and competence in the world of Heroes. That's all from me, good luck to everyone.

I can't find links to the diagrams in the comments.

the heroes didn't work out, but I had luck in poker =)

up up up up up up =))

WATER STILL WATER :smile45: :smile45: :smile45: :smile45: :smile45: :smile45: :smile45: :smile45: :smile45: :smile45: