Regarding Wlk777 being permanently banned. — Tournament History

Wicc

4/14/2010 12:40 PM UTC

Auto-translated

By the way, regarding Wlk777.

It didn't turn out very well. He is, of course, an expressive person, but he doesn't do it out of malice, but rather from an excess of emotion.

Besides, neither I nor Zet knew that he had very little time left before being banned. If we had known, I wouldn't have provoked him so openly, and Zet might not have been so strict.

SergeyY

4/14/2010 1:07 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Something went wrong.

So, what exactly happened? Did you get banned?

злой_романтик

4/14/2010 3:47 PM UTC

Auto-translated

By the way, regarding Wlk777.

It didn't turn out well. He is, of course, an expressive person, but he doesn't do it out of malice, but from an excess of feelings.

Besides, neither I nor Zet knew that he had very little time left before the ban. If we had known, I wouldn't have provoked him so openly, and Zet might not have been so strict. [QUOTE]

I agree. It's a pity for a good player, even if he is too impulsive. :) He loves the game, he's not a cheater, he got most of his points because of his hot-headedness, and he was immediately banned, which is not very nice...:smile27: Maybe it can be resolved somehow, or at least put to a vote.

In reply to злой_романтик

Dirty_Player

4/14/2010 3:56 PM UTC

Auto-translated

evil_romantic

I agree. It's a pity for a good player, even if he's a bit too impulsive. :)
He loves the game, he's not a cheater, he got most of his points because of his passion, and he was immediately banned, which is not very nice... :smile27: Maybe there's a way to resolve this, or at least put it to a vote.

It's a pity, of course, but that's how it happened. He himself asked the Creator for one last chance. If you want to bring him back, write a letter to the Creator.

Дубровин Павел

4/14/2010 3:58 PM UTC

Auto-translated

It seems that Wlk777 (Valentin) has been permanently banned.
I suggest that the Heroes community express their opinions (vote) on the issue of whether or not Valentin should be unbanned from the permanent ban.

Based on the voting results, a reasoned letter will be sent to the Creator, requesting that Wlk777 be unbanned (or not).

С истиной где-то рядом...

Лето 2010.

numOne

4/14/2010 4:03 PM UTC

Auto-translated

I agree. Warlock, by the way, has a lot of valid points, just not in the best way. And in general, I think a permanent ban on the forum should only be issued in extreme cases, for something truly outrageous, and not be cumulative as it is now.

Пусть мой враг будет силен и страшен. Если я поборю его, то не буду чувствовать стыда.

In reply to злой_романтик

asm

4/14/2010 4:03 PM UTC

Auto-translated

evil_romantic

WicBy the way, regarding Wlk777.

It didn't turn out well. He is, of course, an expressive person, but he doesn't do it out of malice, but from an excess of feelings.

Besides, neither I nor Zet knew that he had very little time left before the ban. If we had known, I wouldn't have provoked him so openly, and Zet might not have been so strict.

I agree. It's a pity for a good player, even if he is too impulsive.:)
He loves the game, he's not a cheater, he got most of his points because of his passion, and he was immediately banned, which is not very nice...:smile27: maybe it can be resolved somehow, or at least put to a vote.I agree.

In reply to Дубровин Павел

FireToSky

4/14/2010 4:05 PM UTC

Auto-translated

what did he do?

In reply to Дубровин Павел

Captain

4/14/2010 4:11 PM UTC

Auto-translated

I voted for bringing back the ability to unban players... but I would add that there should also be an option to re-ban them.

Дипломатия - искусство говорить собаке "хорошая собачка" до тех пор пока не найдешь подходящую палку.

In reply to FireToSky

Дубровин Павел

4/14/2010 4:12 PM UTC

Auto-translated

FireToSky

what did he do?

He received the main penalty points for engaging in debates using expressions that directly or indirectly insult another participant.

С истиной где-то рядом...

Лето 2010.

In reply to Дубровин Павел

Catch

4/14/2010 4:40 PM UTC

Auto-translated

A person brings great benefit to HeroesWorld by increasing its popularity. For banning such people, the banners themselves should be banned :)

Школа начального мастерства по Вторым Героям.

http://offtop.ru/heroes2school/

Gomunguls

4/14/2010 5:11 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Bring my fellow countryman back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Удача любит подготовленных!!!

Стримы и обучение тут:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWlnXU5R5RLCMuWzIpBc65Q

In reply to numOne

AYMAN

4/14/2010 5:36 PM UTC

Auto-translated

numOne

I agree. Warlock, by the way, has a lot of valid points, just not in the best way. And in general, in my opinion, a permanent ban on the forum should only be given in extreme cases, for something truly outrageous, and not be cumulative as it is now.

+1, I completely agree with Andrey.

Valentin is a good player, but he does have a tendency to argue a bit.

A permanent ban is very harsh, IMHO.

Lider1

4/14/2010 5:52 PM UTC

Auto-translated

and I'll add my two cents.

I'm also for unbanning him. The cumulative penalty system clearly has a flaw. For example, on the portal, you can place an angel to remove a cloud (6 clouds = ban). With us, it's just the sum of the penalties.

And one more thing, I'll share my opinion: I think most of his violations were committed when he was new to the forum, a newbie, and behaved "mildly speaking" inappropriately. (I myself had a grudge against him back then :D). Now, the person has changed drastically, understood what's what, and has become both an experienced player and a true member of our forum.

I definitely think he should be unbanned.

What should result in a lifetime ban, in my opinion, is cheating.

Сейчас балуюсь этим https://vcmi.eu/download/
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того

In reply to Lider1

Kash

4/14/2010 6:22 PM UTC

Auto-translated

We need to add a tag to Vlk's profile – a prison icon in a red circle with a line through it. "I have a lot of points. Ban only as a last resort."
But yes, the punishment doesn't match the violation; I'm for unbanning him.
We should deduct 50 points from him, otherwise, he'll keep doing it.
50 points are already given in extreme cases.