Auto-translated
The EA guy doesn't make games, he publishes them; you should compare it to Ubi Soft instead. And the AI, compared to the third game, is worse in terms of strategy, but I personally prefer the fifth game for its tactics.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
Oops, I messed up. But it's still Ubisoft, and they would have probably done a much better job.
Oops, I messed up. But even Ubisoft would probably do a much better job.
P.S. Try to understand the topic at least a little bit first before jumping in with comments.
P.P.S. Sorry for being blunt.
And the game turned out great, it has many pluses and one IMHO drawback: the strategic AI, which seems to be getting fixed with patches.
You don't understand, it's the publishers, they don't make the games. Ubi assigned the game to a developer, i.e., Nival. And the game turned out great, it has many advantages and one, in my opinion, disadvantage: the strategic AI, which seems to be fixed with patches.
My AI has been stuck in a castle for 3 weeks, and it's already week 8, and he's still just sitting there!:D
The AI is terrible, and nothing can be done about it:smile16: