Posts from "Heroes 5". But are they really "Heroes"?

yeah, but not for long!

Dear Andrey, the CIS is not a union of former Soviet countries, but a Union of Furious Gamers. If you want, it's an "individual-author update of the abbreviation." If you don't understand, just move on without stopping. I don't consider myself the final authority in all disputes; maybe I expressed myself too sharply or generally a couple of times, so what? =) Heroes are popular in America, and they were on the list of the best games, but ultimately, it has nothing to do with the topic.

I remind you again: I relied on my own opinion + on the results of the survey...

What is this Union? And how many people are in it? Or does it only exist in your imagination?))). And the survey results are like that because the survey is conducted among fans, and even fans from the CIS (not to be confused with the mystical "furious union"!!). If participants from similar forums from other countries could vote, then I would look at these results.

By the way, regarding the Spirit of Heroes! There won't be Barbarians in the add-on; instead, there will be Dwarves (halflings).

By the way, regarding the Spirit of Heroes! There won't be Barbarians in the add-on; there will be Dwarves (halflings).

Never mind. I still think that Barbarians will eventually appear. 7 factions is too few. There will be more.

2 Andrey, tell me about the top ten most popular games in America. You'll find WoW and The Sims there, and the other eight spots are games for Xbox and PS2. If you don't understand that there are different priorities, then don't shout so much.

The add-on will be released next year!

The add-on will be released next year!

So what's so special about that? Name just one add-on that was released three months after the release of the game itself.

I'm sorry, I'm just fed up. I'm tired of this constant negativity. You guys don't seem to understand that Heroes 5 was released as it is, and I believe it will only get better. No one is forcing you to play it. And no game, except for Tetris, has ever been released without bugs and flaws. Nothing is ever perfect, but everything can be fixed. A little history: Counter-Strike 1.5. My friend was a huge fan of the game and played 1.5. He loved it. One day, he came to the club and found that 1.6 was already installed. He swore and complained, but it didn't change anything. He accepted 1.6 and still plays it and loves it. He found many advantages in 1.6 and concluded that it was a successful sequel from Valve. Let's look further: Counter-Strike Source was released, and it was immediately announced that soon after the release of promod (similar to a patch), there would be a global transition to this version. Do you want to see what battles and hatred there were towards the newcomer? Despite the fact that it is far superior to 1.6 in all respects? -
http://cyberfight.ru/site/polls/?topic_id=373 - just read the comments.

Next, we have Warcraft, Unreal Tournament (another version will be released soon), and how they criticize the released Quake 4 - do you know? Yes, they simply hate it! But they are already getting used to it and holding Competitive tournaments on it, and WCG2006 will be on Quake 4. You see, in the end, people accept the game as it is and play it, and those who don't accept it remain loyal to their old version. There are many examples of games EVOLVING, and I think that's right. And there's no need to shout that Heroes 5 is not Heroes at all; it's not up to you to decide.

2 dexter007 8)) Now you'll get it from the ardent fans, and you won't even realize how much. I think people are clinging to the past, unwilling to see the new. You can understand them, nostalgia and all that... But a little bit of reason never hurts.

How many times do I have to say that competitions don't mean anything? Have you seen Clive Barker, Mercury-8, and Age of Mythology played in serious tournaments? Are you familiar with these games?

How many times do I have to say that competitions don't mean anything? In our serious tournaments, players like Clive Barker, Mercury-8, and Age of Mythology participated – are you familiar with these games?

Yes, I'm familiar with them, but we're talking about world computer competitions. There, participants play Starcraft, Warcraft 3 TFT, Counter Strike, Fifa 2006, Warhammer 40k WA, and Quake 4. Now, they've added Heroes 5, the first turn-based strategy game, and this is a very high indicator of in-game balance.

So, world championships are held for Age of Mythologies too! And these games get there because of their incredibly dynamic gameplay!

Well, world competitions are held for Age of Mythologies too! And these games get there because of their fast-paced Gameplay!

lol. I wonder how "world" they are? Within a single city? Or are qualifying rounds for these games held in all major cities of Russia? "World" means World Cyber Games - WCG. That's what "world" means. I also forgot about the evolution of NFS - NFS Carbon will be released soon.

How many times do I have to say that competitions don't mean anything? Were Clive Barker, Mercury-8, and Age of Mythology played in serious tournaments? Are you familiar with these games? I've never even heard of them, so they can't be "world" games.

Age of Mythologies was played in the Catalyst tournaments!

Yes, I'm familiar, but we're talking about global computer competitions. They include Starcraft, Warcraft 3 TFT, Counter Strike, Fifa 2006, Warhammer 40k WA, and Quake 4. Now they've added Heroes 5, the first turn-based strategy game, and that's a very high indicator of in-game balance.

Well, that's right. Since they allowed it to be played, it means the game is top-notch. Starcraft, Warcraft 3 TFT, Counter Strike, Fifa 2006, Warhammer 40k WA, and Quake 4 – there isn't a single bad game in that entire list for me.