Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from [ANOTHER FLAME WAR] Are dragons overpowered or not?Auto-translated
Volke, I told you who I am))) A ginger hybrid of a cat and a dragon, about 60 cm tall)) although generally, dragon-like creatures are the size of a cat, but I'm not one of them)) Olga, "kawaii" comes from the Japanese word "kawai," which means "cute, good"))
Now, the categorical attitude has taken a different form – absolute denial of any of my statements, as can be seen from this post. Are they all false, and is my intellect no higher than the baseboard?
From your posts, I understood that you could seriously start a conflict just like that, out of nowhere.
Is that because I expressed my opinion on the subject of the survey? An opinion that was immediately criticized by several people?
Yes. You said that only your theory is correct, and all facts contradicting it have no right to exist. A fact is a fact, no matter how stupid and primitive it may be. If it doesn't fit the theory, it should be revised.
Not so. My theory is correct, and all facts contradicting it are nothing more than minor arguments that can be easily refuted or easily ignored.
Well, this is Revan, a well-known creator of threads for pointless chatter. I'm sure he didn't intend to start a flame war; he just wanted to have fun himself and entertain people. Again, you're judging a person without knowing him.
My mistake. Unfortunately, I only sprinkle ashes on my head on Sundays.
Oh, how mean and formidable we are. If I weren't a moderator, I would be wielding a flood cannon instead of a ban hammer. Nothing would change. Notice that I didn't start it. You're the one spitting and banging on the table. I'm having a perfectly calm conversation. Moreover, I'll be frank – I like you even less than you like me. But somehow, I have enough sense not to resort to direct insults, attacks, and discussions about upbringing; I just impartially said what I think about your opinion.
Even false demagoguery can sound truthful, right? It's funny to see accusations of spitting from people who, just a post ago, accused me of being dry, cold, and impassive. And yes, "you started it." "Reread your posts."
The next one is especially interesting to me, and both are about the same thing:
If you think that we will change our entire style of communication and the atmosphere of our chat room for you, then you should reconsider your self-esteem.
In such cases, they say, "Don't bring your own rules to someone else's monastery."
The phrases are loud and undoubtedly sound strong, but they are completely wrong. As far as I remember, I was accused of being too formal for a couple of pages (which is even mentioned again just above), asked not to "you" and "join the chatty manner," and then this. Mistake! You are completely inconsistent, and your demagoguery has no basis – these are "answers to answers," with quotations and a momentary refutation not of the position or the overall policy of the conversation, but only of a specific phrase from a specific post. Deny it or not, but that's how it is.
Besides the fact that people accuse each other, get on each other's nerves, argue, and get offended. But otherwise, everything is fine.
That's how only people who are unable to behave adequately act. They resort to personal attacks, and it all ends with the words – "I don't care about your opinion, you idiot." Right? Right. Although, this certainly won't hurt anyone's eyes.
In a pile of manure, you can find pearl grains. Again, you simply discard what is difficult to dispute.
In general, yes. I like to reject material.
By many? Well, well. Is the entire TES series a mess? Well, well. You're trying again to present your opinion as an absolute truth. Speak for yourself and your opinion. Others will speak for themselves. If TES is a mess, then why is Oblivion the best game of 2006?
Because it wasn't made for art, but to please the crowd and fill the coffers with money. That's why most other games have a special atmosphere and soul. However, my position on the Scrolls in general and Oblivion in particular is known to many.
As strange as it may seem, I agree with him. We provide facts, and you stubbornly continue to repeat the same thing, ignoring phrases that have no answer, and actively fuel interpersonal conflict, and yet you accepted the apology and, as it were, closed the topic. Anyone would lose patience.
It's not strange at all, because he's on your side, and I'm not. Few people could be objective in your place, so don't deny it. All your own?
The key word is "flame war." Who started it – me or you? Or do you think I'm so bad that I could ban you for no reason? Well, you know, judging a person without knowing him is not a sign of good manners and objectivity. Before attacking me, you should have
Come on, let's not argue. Morning doesn't want to admit the obvious fact that she has no sense of humor (I just looked at her profile, I didn't even know she was a woman). Well, whatever, I don't care about her opinion anymore, because I've lost all respect for her.
I didn't say she was right; I said that your opinion is limited! ! !
Am I fueling interpersonal conflict?:rolleyes: Isn't that funny?
I repeat once again: If you don't like it here, no one is holding you here. Just don't write here. There is no need to start flame wars and try to prove your superiority over us. I'm not saying that we are all good and right, but we are used to this style of communication. We are not going to change anything for you. Or do you still want to walk around Tula with your samovar?
Yes, to find out what the style of communication is like, you have to go through more than one thorny bush, cursing and pulling out the sharp needles that have pierced your testicles. Now, a sigh.
Well, what else is there to say? The menu consisted of a moderate number of dishes but was distinguished by exquisite taste qualities, a spicy aroma, and calorie content. Relax. Thank you all.
P.S. Great topic, Moni. I really like it, even though it's long. Nice dress, Kosha. It's been a while since we talked. The Emperor likes this topic!
By the way, I didn't start any conflict, so don't blame Kosh. If I say that I don't like you and I'm going to ignore you, that's not a conflict. And what about the dispute – do you need to create a creature, and then it will evolve? What does it look like?
It starts out simple, like an amoeba. If you feed it and don't let other creatures eat it, it will grow and develop. It will run around and collect different DNA. From these, it will create legs, arms, horns, and tails. It will look the way you shape it from the parts. For example:
Is it because I expressed my opinion on the subject of the survey? An opinion that was immediately criticized by several people?
Well, just say that it's YOUR opinion, and don't elevate it to the rank of an axiom.
Not quite. My theory is correct, and all the facts that contradict it are nothing more than minor points that can be easily refuted or ignored.
So, if the facts contradict the theory, too bad for the facts? Well, well. With that attitude, you won't become a scientist.
Even false demagoguery can sound truthful, right? It's funny to see accusations of foaming at the mouth from people who, just a post ago, accused me of being dry, cold, and unemotional. And yes, "you started it." "Reread your posts."
Just a post ago, there was dryness, coldness, and unemotionality.
That's what only people who are incapable of behaving adequately do. They resort to personal attacks in the conversation, and it all ends with the words: "I don't care about your opinion, you idiot." Right? Although, it certainly won't hurt anyone.
Right, but adequate people reasonably and amicably figure out what is true and what is not.
In general, yes. I like to reject material.
Reject as much as you want. But that doesn't mean it doesn't have the right to exist.
Because it wasn't made for art, but to please the crowd and fill the wallet with money. That's why most other games have a special atmosphere and soul. However, my position on scrolls in general and Oblivion in particular is well known to many.
To each their own.
The phrases are loud, and they undoubtedly sound strong, but they are completely wrong.
I don't see any mistakes. We're arguing and arguing, and you're still sitting there and huffing.
P.S. Lock, is that you? You're such a nasty little thing. You were probably laughing a lot, right?
If that's Lok, and he's really saying what he thinks, then I'm sorry, but he turns out to be... Hmm, a bad person, I don't want to give him points. or can I write to you, Kosh? XD
Added after 51 seconds Revan
Right now, I'm drinking a cup filled with hot cocoa. Be jealous.
Werevolka
