Posts from What (or who) do fans of "Heroes" dislike? Auto-translated

2 Civ, maybe it's a lion?

I don't understand what you're talking about.

2 Vih - thanks for your sympathy. Damn, sorry, I can't increase the BD from this dumb phone and with such a bad connection, I'll do it later. 2 Guest - and what about the method itself? 2 Siv - this is about survival.

it's about survival.

No, the dregs will survive, and they will be even worse than those we have faced, because only they have a sufficient level of adaptability.

well, I don't know, I've met some who were just not fit for anything) mostly these were "rich kids".

and regarding bullying and stuff, people used to joke around with me, but they didn't hit me... lol.
in school, it was mostly just verbal, maybe sometimes there were some "games" in the hallway (like wrestling, pushing), but that was just minor stuff... and they treated me normally.
in college, it was worse because it was hard to get along with 3 idiots (jerks) who bothered me almost every day (there were 4 of us in the group, and the rest were girls), especially during classes. They might push you, throw paper at you, etc. (I won't list everything), and they often sat behind me, which made it easier for them.
P.S. but there are those who have it even worse... it's a shame that I can't help them.
some people are bullied, some live in bad conditions from birth, and they practically have no real entertainment, pleasures, or even ordinary treats in their lives (or maybe none at all), and others have their own problems and difficulties.

Well, I don't know, I've encountered some truly inept losers. Mostly, these are "rich kids."

That's exactly what I meant – these types of losers will survive, and compared to them, those you consider to be uncouth will seem like highly intelligent and kind people.

Ну так, lets build communism comrades! :)

So, which would be better: a world without people, or one with them? Not from a human perspective, of course :rolleyes:

Better for whom? Don't forget that consciousness, or, to put it scientifically, higher nervous activity, is possessed exclusively by humans. That is, animals cannot think and feel like humans, and plants even less so. So, if there were no humans, everyone would be indifferent to this fact.

I think that the same squirrel, which the hunter killed for fun and skinned to add to his collection, probably doesn't care much.

A wolf, but not all people hunt squirrels. Some, on the contrary, protect animals and nature.

I think that the same squirrel, which the hunter killed for fun and skinned for his collection, probably doesn't care.

The squirrel absolutely doesn't care – whether it was killed for its fur or eaten by a marten.

But she cares whether she is killed or allowed to live.
2. As I already said, there are good, kind people, but they also need to be killed, because they will continue the lineage and may give rise to evil, bad people.

But for people, it makes a big difference whether the squirrel died for a good cause, because if it did, then everything is fine.

But she doesn't care whether she's killed or allowed to live.

Actually, when a squirrel dies, it won't care. And when it's alive, it simply doesn't know about "death," so it won't worry about it either. It doesn't care, no matter how you look at it.

Why do you think she doesn’t know?