Posts from Rules for Heroes of Might and Magic III online tournaments on HeroesWorld. Auto-translated

1. Alex_R - +1
2.
3.
4. Pit for LM - +1
5.
6. vbn - +1
7. Dubrovin Pavel - +1

For 7 people.

For 7 people!
I'm voting for those I know more or less: Dirty player, Alex_R, Pit for LM, vbn, Dubrovin Pavel, LeBron, invisible.

1. Alex_R - +1
4. Pit for LM - +1
6. vbn - +1

I want to cast my votes for all of them. If they have expressed a desire to work hard, then let them, and I will gladly give them my respect for that.

I vote for the proposed seven! Strong players, who should potentially work well together as a team, will be able to come up with useful solutions for the forum. Moreover, I am currently preparing a project that will revive the "New Recruit Course" from five years ago on a much larger scale, focusing on working with casual Heroes fans and attracting them to our ranks. The help of a new council will be very much needed.

Thanks to Alex_R, Mizrael, LeBron, Pit for LM, scorp, and Dubrovin Pavel.
For 7 people.

Guys, have some mercy on the girl!

:) Thank you for your concern... Yes, perhaps being part of the AK is not the best decision. Although, thank you for your trust!!

Now, regarding my choice.

vbn, Alex_R, Mizrael, LeBron, Pit for LM, scorp, Dubrovin Pavel.

I would also add Dreamcatcher to this list. (instead of someone or along with these 7)

Overall, it's a pity that Nagan and Evgeny won't be here, although these people are already overloaded... But I hope that everything will change in the future!!

I vote for a complete list.

As of this morning, 23 people have voted: bRitvo4kA, Pit for LM, He3Hauka, Dirty_Player, Dubrovin Pavel, Sem 56, SpiriTT, , Hermit, ewgeniy, LeBron, OUTLAW, Dekontaminator, Psyche_7, KostyaN, Alex_R, redwhait, Captain, Nagan-4, vbn, Kash, Ta Kotoraya..., Mizrael.
Preliminary results (the first number is FOR, the second is AGAINST):
1. Alex_R - 16-3
2. Mizrael - 15-0
3. LeBron - 15-1
4. Pit for LM - 21-0
5. scorp - 16-0
6. vbn - 22-0
7. Dubrovin Pavel - 16-3

There is also an ongoing vote for some additional list, which I haven't seen. Dirty_Player is currently leading with 5 votes.
Overall, I like this idea. Our discussion of the rules is progressing quite quickly. Apparently, not everyone has had time to nominate themselves, and we've already started voting. We won't change anything, of course. But the players' opinions are important. Therefore, I'm recording everything and hoping for the future Administrative Council to be assisted by those whom our users trust. And we also need to know the nearest reserve for the next elections.
I also want to vote on the "additional list": FOR Nagan-4, Dirty_Player, and invisible.

Of those I know, I would vote for:
Alex_R
Pit for LM
vbn
Dubrovin Pavel
I have nothing against the others, I simply don't know them, so I will abstain from voting for them.
I don't think the number of participants is too important, so I will also abstain on that issue.

I'll vote too...

For - Pit, Lebron, Dirty, vbn

Against - Alex_R.

I don't know the others well, so I'll abstain.

Regarding Alex_R, it seems worth explaining in more detail. The thing is, this person exhibits behavior that is ethically incompatible with the high position they are being nominated for. It's a kind of petty meanness, manifesting in minor acts of mischief, attempts to undermine, and barking like a dog, etc.

This is especially noticeable in contrast to the resonant voice and broad chest (in the forum sense) of the people I listed above.

In arguments with him, I sometimes even get lost - whether to ignore him or immediately shower him with large-scale insults, because I really don't want to emulate his method of conducting a dispute.

If you do elect him, my advice is - it would be better not to let him handle controversial situations involving me, as there will be fewer flying shards.

He may be a good person in life, but he is not compatible with power.

Just my opinion.

Regarding Alex_R

1. We are not friends, so you shouldn't distort my nickname as you please. 2. I didn't ask for your public assessment, especially not in an offensive manner. 3. I also want to note that, thanks to this person, there has been an increase in impunity for cheating on Hv (Heroes vs. Heroes). (and he knows exactly what I'm talking about). 4. Most importantly: I don't consider this a high position or authority, and I don't need it. If you need my help, I can help, but if not, that's fine. P.S. Regarding my opinion of you and the importance of your opinion against me, I've already said it, which is probably why you're annoyed.

Thank goodness Vigo wasn't included in the list of candidates; it's scary to imagine what would have happened then. :confused: :eek:

If you do choose him, my advice is to avoid having him mediate disputes involving me, as it will minimize the fallout.

This request is impossible to fulfill, as it contradicts common sense.
I simply advise you to be more considerate and avoid getting into trouble with the Arbitration Committee or by simply not violating the Heroes World Forum Rules.

1 We are not comrades for you to distort my nickname as you please
2 I did not ask for your public evaluation, especially in an insulting manner
3 I also want to note that due to this comrade's instigation, impunity for cheating has increased on HeroesWorld. (and he knows perfectly well what this is about)
4 Most importantly: I do not consider this a high position or authority and I do not need it; if my help is needed — I can help, and if not — then no harm done.

P.S. as for my opinion of you and the importance of your voice against me, I have already stated it, which is probably why you are so furious.

How quickly the voice appeared :smile26:

Couldn't make sense of point 3, it is in any case incorrect regarding the content of the parentheses, and the main point I might be able to comment on only if you remind me.