Posts from Historical books by A. Bushkov. Auto-translated

Sure, no problem. :)

A few posts ago, you mentioned that there are works that debunk Suvorov's theory and demonstrate its inconsistency.

Not "allegedly," but there are. :) The works of Rezun-Suvorov have been thoroughly refuted on all fronts. Moreover, none of the serious, let alone authoritative, researchers and specialists have supported his ideas. This is also an important factor that cannot be ignored. Furthermore, in the scientific community, this type of literature is considered pseudoscientific, so-called folk history. In short, it's a cheap publication, if you will.

Could you share links to these sources?

Relatively recently, a good collection of works on this topic was published: A. Isaev, Svirin, Drig, and others. "The Untruth of V. Suvorov." It would be ideal. But, unfortunately, I haven't found it online; perhaps you will have better luck.

Therefore, I suggest you look at the individual works of the most authoritative researcher (whose works are widely available online) - Alexei Isaev: "Antisuvorov" and "Ten Myths of World War II", and you can also check out the rest in the same place.

The work of Vladimir Gryzun (this is a collective pseudonym of the Yaroslavl historians A.M. Lokhanin and M.B. Nuzhdin): "How Viktor Suvorov Wrote History"

And Gabriel Gorodetsky "The Myth of the 'Icebreaker': On the Eve of the War"

I can also look around and add more. :smile26:

Sincerely, Pandora