Controversial issues and their resolutions. — General

<RU>

17 years ago

Auto-translated

Sem made such a fuss over some trivial matter... He could have sorted it out with Alex in-game... Djede...

Added 5 minutes later
I'm back!!!

In reply to <RU>

SEM_56

17 years ago

Auto-translated

Sem made such a fuss over some trivial matter... He could have sorted everything out with Alex in a private message... Djede...

Added 5 minutes later
I'm back!!!

Apparently, the girl is brave, as she points out events that don't even concern her....
Can we inquire about the reason for her eagerness to join the Heroes community?
In my opinion, such players, in any sport, should be disqualified for a very long time, regardless of their gender or religion!!:smile30:

SpiriTT

17 years ago

Auto-translated

BU-GA-GA!!! Nothing more to add... at least change your avatar – there are plenty of beautiful photos on the internet, and it would make things more fun for us! =)

<RU>

17 years ago

Auto-translated

Alex is my friend, and that's why I'm expressing my opinion on controversial issues.

Added 2 minutes later
BU-GA-GA!!! Nothing more to add... at least she should change her avatar – there are plenty of beautiful photos on the internet, and it would be more fun for us! =)
I sent my photo to those who need it...

ewgeniy

17 years ago

Auto-translated

Ahem...
This resource prohibits having duplicate or cloned profiles, and all that entails...
User RU has been given 50 penalty points for violating the rules of heroesworld.ru.
Djede, once you reach 100 penalty points, your account will be automatically blocked. If you continue in the same manner as before, I will add another 50.

Qwerty

17 years ago

Auto-translated

Wicc

I wasn't talking about that level. Imagine a starting setup (or better yet, a series of setups). And an ideal level of development, say, in 2 weeks. Let's consider that as 100%.

Then, we give this setup to different players and see what percentage of the ideal they achieve (in a real game, not offline). This is the famous level of effectiveness. We average it across the setups.

I've analyzed many saves from different players, and I have a pretty good understanding of the level of play. So, I often see a lot of mistakes in top players in SoD that are not typical for top players in TE.

Recently, I watched Vitalik's game against Sirus, which he posted in the interportal thread. He was afraid to attack the lizardmen horde on the grass with his flux army (with water elementals), a hero with the "Feast" ability, and 7 basilisks from Bron. I, on the other hand, broke them with the loss of 2 air units and 2 water elementals, without using magic (and it would have been even easier with a spellbook and haste). I've broken them many times in real games, too, and without basilisks (for example, playing with Invisibility).

And this is a player who has a tournament win rate of around 90% in SoD. I still have a long way to go...

Wicc, I'm replying in this thread because otherwise it will be off-topic.
I don't quite agree, and here's why. There's the result of vitalic in the Portal match against Bay. To reiterate, the result was 2-0 in favor of vitalic. Therefore, I don't find this example very convincing. There are good players on Bay, no one disputes that. But playing as a team (!!!) with morale disabled for neutral creatures or in a real game is a big difference. You can take almost any online match and, by analyzing the saves, find opportunities for improvement, etc. The higher the element of randomness (and it's higher in SoD than in other versions of the game), the greater the risk, and a player's skill in SoD also includes assessing game risks...

P.S. The article is good.

Samurai

17 years ago

Auto-translated

Wlk777

Regarding Vigo, I already posted evidence of his cheating; they were deleted, but he is allowed to accuse others of cheating without any attempt to justify his claims. I state responsibly and am always ready to prove that Vigo is a CHEATER. Let him refute this, but I think he will remain silent again.

What a mess! As soon as I said this, I was immediately given a permanent ban, but if I said "my opinion," they can just delete it and forget about it. :(
They say there's constant bickering on other sites. Today, I went to the World of Heroes forum, and in the rating thread, it's just a bunch of complaints. In the tournament with Lithuanians, it's the same (although when I warned about a conflict, I was told that everything was fine, and it was just my imagination). In the seasonal reports, there's bickering every other time, and in TC3, many people attacked the inexperienced host. :( IMHO, the situation on the World of Heroes forum is generally the same as everywhere else.
About those cheaters that everyone knows about but doesn't talk about openly. I think it's time for some organizer to take responsibility and not allow this pair to participate in tournaments. I personally spoke with 8 players from the top 50 of this ranking. They all, like me, know these cheaters, don't play with them, and dissuade others from playing with them. How long will this circus continue? (they say, "we know, but we can't do anything about it")
About the ranking: I think the ranking is normal; it's wrong to be offended that there are people ahead of you who play much worse. As long as the games are not commercial, and Heroes is not reliably protected from cheating, this situation will always exist.

Wicc

17 years ago

Auto-translated

So, if you know, why don't you provide a well-reasoned explanation? I've outlined the methodology both theoretically and with examples. I, for one, don't hesitate to analyze Ed's save files and his texts, providing concrete arguments, and the result is clear – he's already received his second ban in a row. Banning someone based on rumors is clearly absurd.

In reply to Wicc

Samurai

17 years ago

Auto-translated

Wicc

Well, if you know, why don't you provide a well-reasoned explanation? I've outlined the methodology both theoretically and with examples.

I'm not too lazy to analyze Edik's saves and his texts, to present specific arguments, and the result is clear - he's getting banned for the second time in a row.

Banning based on rumors is clearly absurd.

It seems like you don't know what pair we're talking about! :D

In reply to Samurai

Alex_R

17 years ago

Auto-translated

He3Hauka

As soon as I said that, I was immediately given a permanent autoban, but if I had said "mine," I could have just rubbed it out and forgotten about it. :(

Mom, why can he stick his tongue out at me but I can't? :)

What you wrote about HeroesWorld is more like this!

They say there's constant bickering on other sites. I visited the World today and stirred up some drama, so that IMHO the situation on the World overall would be the same as everywhere else.

Quote edited

SEM_56

17 years ago

Auto-translated

Message from He3Hauka: They say there's constant bickering on other sites... We want to maintain a consistently friendly atmosphere, and if someone like Neznayka tries to disrupt it, they should be banned from our site... I ask that moderators pay attention to such posts and take action!

Wlk777

17 years ago

Auto-translated

StickyFingaz

Sem, respect to you, man!!! And Warlock too.

It's strange that Vigo accuses others of cheating without even trying to prove it, and no one has any complaints about him, but I'm ready to stand by my words, and I'm being accused of getting banned? If this is how I'm treated, then I agree, I don't need such a resource.

StickyFingaz

17 years ago

Auto-translated

It's strange that Vigo accuses others of cheating without even trying to prove it, and no one has any complaints about him, but I'm ready to stand by my words, and I'm being accused of getting banned?

Vigo has nothing to do with it.
By the way, since you're ready to back up your words, provide irrefutable evidence of Vigo's cheating.

In reply to Samurai

Wicc

17 years ago

Auto-translated

He3Hauka

It seems like you don't know which couple we're talking about! :D

I'm aware of everything and share the same opinion as the community. But this is my opinion, and without specific arguments, I don't think it's necessary to advocate for it.