Posts from Life Buildings

Life is good when you take your time and enjoy it :D And tactics are a good thing, but not when used by your main hero.

Life is good when you take your time and enjoy it :D And tactics are not a bad thing, but not for the main hero.

Well, you can also level up the main hero at the altars! :D
Since a general gives +1 to the morale of the entire army! :D
Just buy a tactician, build a seminary, research it, and level up the combat skill! :D :cool:

Yes, but this is no longer the main hero. And you are right about the seminary. But first, it's still better to level up magic for the main hero. In general, it's better to use a combination: a mage with a tactician.

I agree! :) I'm just used to fighting with one hero! :D It's faster to level up, and one warrior on the battlefield can do a lot (meaning, without an army, he can still do a lot), that's why I respect the Barbarian! :D And when playing as others (except for Chaos, where I limit myself to one thief), it's obviously easier with 2 heroes! :cool: True, even if you take Life as a skill, the first thing you need to do is immediately train tactics in the seminary, because if he gets hit, it will be harder to do it in battle, and the morale bonus of +1 for the GENERAL also won't hurt! :D :cool:

Yes, if the hero is a tactician, then it's all about the battle. The general will decide everything :) And if it's a mage, then use Life Magic first, and then whatever they prefer.

General is awesome! :) When you have a general with a well-developed tactic (at least in terms of movement speed), then a pikeman is basically a death sentence for other level 2 units (I mean that a pikeman is better than a ballista)! :D :cool:

EXCLUSIVELY pikeman-crusader-angel!!! ballistas are WEAK, monks are STUPID, and champions...:smile13: are worse than angels:smile47: MUCH worse:smile47: :smile47: :smile47:

pikeman and ballista (depending on who you're playing against), then crusaders (but monks are also good), angel...

This is why I love the fourth game... because you have a choice. Variety, tactics, strategy, and taking the opponent into account! Before, I always built ballistae... now I prefer pikemen.

ballista, monk, tangel, I voted that way.

pikeman - preemptive strike, range, and can be resurrected
monk - a healthy ranged unit, though...
champion - weaker, but has charge, first strike, and gains twice as much as an angel... but sometimes you can even defeat an angel...

Personally, we've been playing together for a while now, and in every game, everyone picks a Ballista-Monk and a Champion. When playing for survival, I'm the only one doing it. Of course, you can argue about Ballistas and Spearmen, but Champions are definitely better than Angels! In general, when I first started playing, the common strategy was to have one ranged unit and one melee unit, either a Spearman-Monk or a Ballista-Knight.

I always build a Spearman-Monk-Champion, but if there are still Castle units available, I can also build some Angels to have a backup squad.

The second tier consists of pikemen. Ballistas are slow, while pikemen are quite durable and have a ranged attack. For the third tier, I choose monks. They compensate for the lack of archers in the second tier, and they are quite durable with a protective aura. The fourth tier is more like angels. The situation is similar to Chaos with hydras and dark knights. I prefer quality over quantity. Resurrection will also be useful.

Resurrection won't hurt :)

Especially resurrecting a hero ;) Although I'm not very familiar with the rules of Life, maybe it's banned in Equilibris... I don't remember :rolleyes: