Posts from Team tournament!

Please tell me, wouldn't it be easier to implement a 2 vs 2 mode directly in the game? It would be much more interesting. Or, each player could play with their own Castle, and the result would be counted towards the team's score. Trust is a delicate thing, you know?

Added after 9 minutes
Please tell me, wouldn't it be easier to implement a 2 vs 2 mode directly in the game? It would be much more interesting. Or, each player could play with their own Castle, and the result would be counted towards the team's score. Trust is a delicate thing, you know?

because trust is a delicate matter, you know?

Yeah, especially when the tournament organizer demands a bribe in every post!:smile52: Just kidding. Dear Dream Weaver, thank you very much, it's a pity that you are not participating in the tournament.

because trust is a delicate matter, right?

If you're afraid of wolves, don't go into the forest! The entire online game is built solely on trust.

to Decontaminator:

;) )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

We're waiting for the next untrustworthy team...

465-214-860

Forgot to mention that the blue player starts! Added this to the schedule post.

Could you please tell me, wouldn't it be easier to make it 2 vs 2 in the game itself? It would be more interesting. Or, each player plays with their own Castle, and the result is counted towards the team's score. Trust is a delicate thing, you know?

That's an interesting idea! I hope someone will take on the task of organizing it, and that such a tournament will be held someday!!!

Could you please tell me, wouldn't it be easier to implement a 2 vs 2 mode directly in the game? It would be much more interesting. Or, each player could play with their own castle, and the result would be counted towards the team's score. Trust is a delicate thing, you know?

Yeah, well...:( We've already tried playing 2x2... It takes an AWFUL amount of time for this type of game. Plus, it's impossible to find a lot of time that is FREE for all 4 players at the same time. Plus, any of the 4 players might disconnect (it happens with two players - and it's bound to happen with four). So, the idea has already been tried. It's, I'm sorry to be blunt, a dead end... :(

I just hope we don't get the Frol brothers as opponents :D

It's clear who Lavets favors, but he doesn't seem to like us and Inviz.)))

Especially Invisibla)))

It's clear who Lavets favors, but he doesn't like us and Inviz.)))

Especially Invizible)))

:smile05:
Uran (blue, swamp, Tank, Tank) def invisible (red, Fortress, Grechkin, Grechkin) 2sm4d(3)

Thanks for the game!

Added 8 hours 0 minutes ago
invisible (red, Castle, Valeska, Jabarkas) def Vigo (Rampart, Kirr, Kirr) 2sm4d(3)
Thanks for the game!

invisible (red, Castle, Valenska, Jabarkas) def Vigo (Rampart, Kirr, Kirr) 2sm4d(3)
Thank you for the game!

It happened before. Thank you for the game.

Mizrael (Necropolis, Galthran) defeated Hargas (red, Dungeon, Gunnar) 2 small maps, 4 daily maps (3). Thank you for the game.

Respect to everyone who played the first game. And InvisibleMan, at this rate, will finish it faster than anyone else! Don't fall behind!

Dear players, despite my best efforts to warn you, even using large font, one pair still forgot to save at the beginning of 1-1-1. There is a way to partially fix the situation. After the game ends, the hosting player needs to upload the save to Hotseat, replay the scenario, and immediately save it. The resulting save will differ from the original start of the game with different heroes in the tavern, a different composition, and a different number of troops for the starting hero. And there is another necessary condition: the generated random map must remain in the random_maps directory. The 15 most recent maps are saved there, and there is a high probability that the hosting player will not have played 15 games since the first game :) But if, for some reason, it is not possible to restore the save, the team will have to be penalized with a loss :mad: