Did the graphics of Heroes 3 not deter you from wanting to play? — General

eXeCuToR

18 years ago

Auto-translated

Doom II is a classic shooter, and I'm actually playing it right now. The graphics in Diablo are quite good, and when comparing Heroes III to its contemporaries or even games released slightly later that are considered more modern, you can say that Heroes III is better than all these games, even when compared to Warcraft III. The graphics in Heroes (in my opinion, of course) are better and more pleasing.

Step aside from the way of a better man than you
So you fall at his feet hes the one who betrays you
Its the servants devotion for the decay
Stand up

There are no flowers on your grave
There are no chains
There I keep chanting for the forgotten name © Amorphis

blind'ik

18 years ago

Auto-translated

I've been playing Heroes since the second installment; the graphics in the third one are decent, but I don't like the way some creatures are rendered in the second game.

Барук Казад! Казад аи-мену! => "Гномы ням-ням."- сказал дракон. :smile19: Люди пейте гномояд!:smile51:

Sforza

18 years ago

Auto-translated

No, it didn't deter them. And strategy game players don't really care about graphics anyway.

65RUS

18 years ago

Auto-translated

I really like the graphics; they’re even better than in Heroes of Might and Magic V. The graphics were excellent for that time (1999) and still are.

"Отыщи всему начало, и ты многое поймёшь."
К. Прутков.

Играю тут http://www.heroeswm.ru
Супер онлайн игра по Героям 5.:smile14:

З.Ы. Я вернулся на форум)))

eXeCuToR

18 years ago

Auto-translated

It’s true that it’s outdated now, we have to admit that, but it hasn’t become any less enjoyable because of it.

Step aside from the way of a better man than you
So you fall at his feet hes the one who betrays you
Its the servants devotion for the decay
Stand up

There are no flowers on your grave
There are no chains
There I keep chanting for the forgotten name © Amorphis

Драко

18 years ago

Auto-translated

I won't say anything original; on the contrary, I feel like I'm just repeating what everyone else has said – when you're playing, the graphics don't matter. Ask me how the spearmen move, and I won't be able to tell you, but I do know that they're stronger than hobbits :). On the other hand, the graphics are important – it's not enjoyable to play the first Might and Magic games precisely because of the "childish" graphics (this is just my personal opinion).

С уважением, Драко

Философия Героев!
Пишите сценарии!
Продолжи писать историю!

In reply to eXeCuToR

снайп

18 years ago

Auto-translated

eXeCuToR;132096

Why are there so many games with minimal graphics requirements, but are still very interesting – Tank Battles on the Dendy is a prime example.

Tank Battles is a true masterpiece!! :smile03: It's been around for so long, but everyone who has ever played it still wants to play it.

In reply to 2DDarkKnight

kj1313

18 years ago

Auto-translated

2DDarkKnight;132260

If I like a game, I don't care about the graphics. But of course, it's better if they are a little better. Heroes 3 is a good game, and the graphics are cool there. Even if it's primitive, it doesn't matter, the main thing is the gameplay.
P.S. I play Diablo 2, Doom 2, Duke Nukem 3D, Alien trilogy. The graphics in all these games are not outstanding (and of course, Doom 2 was released in 1994).

The main thing is the gameplay, and if the graphics are too demanding, then the computer requirements increase, which I don't like. The graphics in the game can be cool, but the gameplay may not be very good...

The graphics in Heroes 3 are not repulsive, but normal; it certainly doesn't irritate my eyes....

Sometimes I play Hexen (1994), Hexen II (1997), Heretic (1994), Quake 2 (1996)...

снайп;132448

Tanks are a masterpiece!!:smile03: They've been around for so long, but everyone who has ever played them still wants to play them.

It's a cool thing...

Всадник СМЕРТИ
- Смерть - судьба всех и каждого.

Очень Хаотичный Лидер Клана "Рыцари апокалипсиса"

Taliau

18 years ago

Auto-translated

IMHO, the lovingly detailed textures in Heroes 3 are much better than the clunky "3D" models in Heroes 4. The graphics are one of the main reasons why Heroes 4 didn't become as much of a masterpiece as its predecessor.

Julyanna

18 years ago

Auto-translated

Not at all. On the contrary, the graphics are quite good, both for today and for the time when this game was first released.

Alex_R

18 years ago

Auto-translated

Stepan;132042

Didn't the graphics of the third Heroes game deter you from wanting to play?
Does it even affect the gameplay?

Graphics are nothing, the idea is everything!!!
I never paid attention to the graphics, but for me, the graphics in Heroes 3 are very good. Compared to the changes in graphics from Heroes 1 to Heroes 2, Heroes 3 made a revolutionary leap forward (especially in the rendering of castles), and in Units, "the second one" is also decent!:smile54:

SandroXXL

18 years ago

Auto-translated

What a silly question, of course not! Moreover, the third installment of the series is associated only with 2D graphics. Many people play both the second and the first games; I personally got hooked on King's Bounty and play it on my mobile phone.

Просто еще один

kcfgogbfalgfl

18 years ago

Auto-translated

No way!
It seems to me that everything is fine there.

Стартовый пост - Квенты - Разное -
Резара - Аксель - Орвальд - Эмилия -

In reply to kcfgogbfalgfl

T@mar@

18 years ago

Auto-translated

I had a computer until 1999 that was so bad, I had to uninstall everything from the office just to play Heroes. The graphics were AMAZING. I work with graphics, and I've always been impressed by the authors' "fanaticism"!
Besides that: the cutscenes in the campaigns are "unique," and in Heroes 5 (no offense intended), they already have 3D, but the cutscenes are sparse: duplicated creatures, their standard movements (I could create their models in 3DSMAX in 15 minutes - no bragging), so the GRAPHICS are THE BEST!!! :)