Skip to content

Posts from Your rating for the game:

General Closed Topic
No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
Closed
How would you rate the game?
29 voters
Single choice Public votes
This poll is closed.
1
3.4% 1 vote
2
0% 0 votes
3
0% 0 votes
4
3.4% 1 vote
5
10.3% 3 votes
6
10.3% 3 votes
7
6.9% 2 votes
8
10.3% 3 votes
9
17.2% 5 votes
10
37.9% 11 votes
User Avatar
18 years ago
Auto-translated
10 points. In the third game, the units are more static – they have fewer abilities. And there's more choice. And the editor. And magic. Magic and the editor are probably the coolest things. In general, no matter how much you play, it never gets boring...
User Avatar
18 years ago
Auto-translated
Yes, I agree with the previous commenters, the editor is simply amazing. Plus, the ability to create an RPG map. This isn't possible in any other part of the game. And, Draco, +1, the sound is simply divine. It's the best sound design of all the games.
User Avatar
18 years ago
Auto-translated
I think 6-7 points seem sufficient.
User Avatar
18 years ago
Auto-translated
I gave it an 8. Although I really love the fourth game. But still, we need to be objective. Therefore:
One minus for the bugs (although it could be two, but 7 is too low for this game).
The second minus is for the appearance of the heroes and some of the monsters.
In reply to Zybr
User Avatar
18 years ago
Auto-translated
I didn't play much because I didn't like it right away. The unit selection annoys me. I give it a 1.
In reply to Cheri@
User Avatar
18 years ago
Auto-translated
Cheri@;142790
I haven't played much,
So go ahead and play if you don't understand the essence of the game. I'm sure you don't even bother using your brain to understand that different doesn't mean bad.
Cheri@;142790

because I didn't like it right away.
You didn't like me right away either, but I'm not a moderator, so I'll just say what I think. Play where you like, if you can and don't mess things up for others.
Cheri@;142790
The unit selection annoys me. I give it a 1.
You don't need me to explain why you annoy me.
User Avatar
18 years ago
Auto-translated
but Xel is saying the same thing about the fifth game... can I really be blamed now?
User Avatar
18 years ago
Auto-translated
well, I don't know... I wouldn't say the sound is great)))
just listen to the "howl" sound effect for the building with wolves (on the map)... other sounds are better, but still not that great.
User Avatar
18 years ago
Auto-translated
Ar, it's not about the sound, but about the music. It's much better than the music in any other part.

Added after 46 seconds
imho, of course. But many will agree.
User Avatar
18 years ago
Auto-translated
Lock, the music doesn't really grab me either))) I like the music in the third game much more.))
This is just my personal opinion, of course.))
In reply to LeSHiJ-MaX
User Avatar
18 years ago
Auto-translated
LeSHiJ-MaX;142961
I would play, if you understood the essence of the game. I'm sure you don't even bother using your brain to understand that different doesn't mean bad.
You didn't make a good impression on me either, but I'm not a moderator, so I'll just say this: play where you like, if you can and don't spoil things for others.
No need to explain why you annoy me.
I won't stoop to your level and argue publicly! I'll write to you in private.
User Avatar
18 years ago
Auto-translated
I gave it a 6: it seems like a decent game, but it's not perfect. I play it occasionally; maybe I'm just not a fan of this installment.
In reply to Cheri@
User Avatar
18 years ago
Auto-translated
Cheri@;142790
I didn't play much because I didn't like it right away. The unit selection annoys me. I gave it a 1.
When I first started playing, I didn't really like the game (about 3 years ago). But there was nothing else to play. So, I forced myself to figure it out, and I managed to beat the computer. After that, I felt a real enjoyment from the game, which led me to victory. Right after that, I fell in love with the fourth installment:D I played day and night until the computer became child's play for me. Then I went to GameSpy, played there for a year or so, and then I accidentally ended up here and "settled" here. But that's already off-topic. Back to the point:
1. Having played the game only a little, you can't yet make a correct comparison, because you haven't felt the joy of victory over someone, or the satisfaction of achieving something after spending 2 hours grinding.
2. A score of 1 is still not a fair assessment (at least not because of the unit selection). It's not a valid reason. Based on your position, it would be more appropriate to give it a score of 3-4 (not 10, of course:D). You don't have any arguments.
P.S. And do you think about why people are so critical of you? The answer is very simple:
The fewer arguments you have, the less respect you get. That's all from me.
In reply to OptiMAL
User Avatar
18 years ago
Auto-translated
1. I played it enough to understand it. 2. There's nothing to do in the campaign in part 4, let alone in part 3. In IV, the AI is dumb, and that's true. In 3, it's at least capable of something. Maybe 1 is an exaggeration, but I repeat: every opinion is an OPINION.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: recijeb