Zeratul
Auto-translated
Colleagues, thank you all so much for responding. I would also like to apologize to colleague Lis, but his personal message was quite offensive.
Well, as they say, if there are activists, that's great. I believe that we need to initially create something like an artistic council to discuss the initial ideas. By the way, I would like to point out to colleague Lis that almost all scenarios, in one way or another, originate in works of fiction, so we will initially have to create such a work. I think I expressed myself quite fully in my initial proposal - we need to create a foundation, a literary basis, on which we can then build the walls and roof of this work. It seems to me that neither Lukyanenko, nor Perumov, nor even more so Tolkien, ever thought about adapting their works, so there is nothing to be afraid of.
Now, briefly about the structure. As I said, we need to create something like an artistic council, a center for criticism (it seems that colleague Lis could take the place of chairman in it), and something like a center for literary processing. Of course, I am exaggerating; you can call it whatever you want, elect someone like a chief editor and a chief censor. Colleagues, please understand me correctly - I am not creating some kind of bureaucratic organization; I am just making a suggestion, and how it will be implemented is up to us all.
I see it approximately like this. A group of authors creates the premises of the plot(s), sends them to the forum in the archives, the center for criticism looks for weaknesses, rejects them, and then the literary processing section begins to work on the resulting text(s), which combines the pieces of text, and then the result is posted on the forum, and the censor comes into action. And only after him does the editor check the resulting result, after which we all decide what needs to be added, what to remove, which moment is better, etc. So, suggest, colleagues!
