Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from 🔥 Иказкан -> ТезотAuto-translation in progress
We can calculate the outcome of the battle, assuming that the cloak does not protect against skull attacks. Then, Revan will come and decide whether to count the result or declare your victory. Because if the skull attack is indeed ignored, then you have already defeated him...
Is that okay?
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно. Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится. (Закон сохранения).
The villainous exploiter wants to attack Bo, but fails the check again, and changes his mind again... Bo attacks the villainous exploiter, the villainous exploiter takes 0 damage (shield) The villainous exploiter wants to attack Bo, fails the check, changes his mind... Bo attacks the villainous exploiter, miss
The villainous exploiter's turn... OD is over...
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно. Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится. (Закон сохранения).
As I understand it, it protects against attacks in general... 🤔 The "Action" is, like, an attack, and everything else is "secondary." If there's no attack, where does everything else come from? 🤔
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно. Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится. (Закон сохранения).
Oh, and by the way, my armor also has a one-time defense – does that work the same way? If so, then I'll hit him first, and then, after the armor's defense wears off, I'll switch to a different tactic.
The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses. The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, misses. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses. The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, changes his mind. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield). The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses. The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, changes his mind. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield). The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield). The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield). The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield). The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses. The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, changes his mind. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield). The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield). The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield). The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses. The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, misses. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield). The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses. The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, misses. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses. The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, misses. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield). The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell (spirit 10/310). Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses. The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, changes his mind. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield). The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, misses. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (protection from the first attack). The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, instant kill -, disease + (breathing difficulties, stamina 29->14), the Villain-Exploiter takes 50-60=0 damage. The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, changes his mind. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses. The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, changes his mind. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses. The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, changes his mind. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses. The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, misses. Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, instant kill + (protection from the first negative effect), disease + (excess weight, evasion 52%->26%), the Villain-Exploiter takes 50-60=0 damage. The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, Bo takes (crit) (360-50)*2=620 damage (-320/300).
The Villain-Exploiter wins (?)...
🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️ Revant, come and restore order... 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
Added 1 minute ago Heroist
Hey, by the way, I also have a one-time protection on my armor - does that work too? If so, then I'll hit him first, and then when the armor protection wears off, I'll use the top tactic.
Sorry, I noticed too late. But it doesn't really matter in the end...
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно. Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится. (Закон сохранения).
I just don't want to. If I had won, there wouldn't have been any questions, but I don't want to lose in an outsourced match. Even GMs sometimes have shortcomings or make mistakes when counting, on a more or less regular basis, and in this case, I can't be sure of anything. So, unofficially, I can't accept this result.