Skip to content

Posts from 🔥 Иказкан -> Тезот Auto-translation in progress

5.0 (1 rating)
User Avatar
#5317
Auto-translated
//Well, Revan mentioned earlier that this is a negative mental effect, so either the cloak or the shield should work in theory.

You can calculate one more hit, but if it still doesn't work, maybe it's better to clarify this point, because I don't want to get sick..

Whatever
User Avatar
#5318
Auto-translated
We can calculate the outcome of the battle, assuming that the cloak does not protect against skull attacks. Then, Revan will come and decide whether to count the result or declare your victory. Because if the skull attack is indeed ignored, then you have already defeated him...

Is that okay?

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

User Avatar
#5319
Auto-translated

Okay, let’s do it that way.

It will be enough for two more turns of Offense Defense.


Whatever
User Avatar
#5320
Auto-translated
The villainous exploiter wants to attack Bo, but fails the check again, and changes his mind again...
Bo attacks the villainous exploiter, the villainous exploiter takes 0 damage (shield)
The villainous exploiter wants to attack Bo, fails the check, changes his mind...
Bo attacks the villainous exploiter, miss

The villainous exploiter's turn... OD is over...

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

User Avatar
#5321
Auto-translated
//Did the shield protect against disease and instant death?

Whatever
User Avatar
#5322
Auto-translated
As I understand it, it protects against attacks in general... 🤔 The "Action" is, like, an attack, and everything else is "secondary." If there's no attack, where does everything else come from? 🤔

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

User Avatar
#5323
Auto-translated
Well, if that's the case, I'll cast Shield until he misses, then I'll attack with a regular attack, and I'll keep doing that until my mana runs out..

Whatever
User Avatar
#5324
Auto-translated
At least, during the battle with you, Katarina didn't suffer any damage from Oval's cannon's initial attacks due to her defense...

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

User Avatar
#5325
Auto-translated
Oh, and by the way, my armor also has a one-time defense – does that work the same way? If so, then I'll hit him first, and then, after the armor's defense wears off, I'll switch to a different tactic.

Whatever
User Avatar
#5326
Auto-translated
The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses.
The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, misses.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses.
The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, changes his mind.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield).
The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses.
The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, changes his mind.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield).
The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield).
The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield).
The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield).
The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses.
The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, changes his mind.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield).
The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield).
The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield).
The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses.
The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, misses.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield).
The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses.
The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, misses.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses.
The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, misses.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield).
The Villain-Exploiter casts a shield spell (spirit 10/310).
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses.
The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, changes his mind.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (shield).
The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, misses.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, the Villain-Exploiter takes 0 damage (protection from the first attack).
The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, instant kill -, disease + (breathing difficulties, stamina 29->14), the Villain-Exploiter takes 50-60=0 damage.
The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, changes his mind.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses.
The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, changes his mind.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses.
The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, changes his mind.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, misses.
The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, misses.
Bo attacks the Villain-Exploiter, instant kill + (protection from the first negative effect), disease + (excess weight, evasion 52%->26%), the Villain-Exploiter takes 50-60=0 damage.
The Villain-Exploiter attacks Bo, Bo takes (crit) (360-50)*2=620 damage (-320/300).

The Villain-Exploiter wins (?)...

🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Revant, come and restore order... 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

Added 1 minute ago
Heroist
Hey, by the way, I also have a one-time protection on my armor - does that work too? If so, then I'll hit him first, and then when the armor protection wears off, I'll use the top tactic.
Sorry, I noticed too late. But it doesn't really matter in the end...

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

User Avatar
#5327
Auto-translated
//That's why Revan doesn't like counting battles...

but I still think the first option is more accurate; we'll find out in the evening

Whatever
User Avatar
#5328
Auto-translated
Forgot to add the crit check on the last attack. It triggered...🤣🤣🤣

Added 1 minute later
Heroist
//that's why Revan doesn't like counting battles Yashchur hates randomness…
fixed...

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

User Avatar
#5329
Auto-translated
I probably won't accept this result without a recount.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
In reply to Happy Life
User Avatar
#5330
Auto-translated
Happy Life
I suppose I won't accept such a result without a recalculation.
Something wrong?🤔

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

User Avatar
#5331
Auto-translated
I just don't want to. If I had won, there wouldn't have been any questions, but I don't want to lose in an outsourced match. Even GMs sometimes have shortcomings or make mistakes when counting, on a more or less regular basis, and in this case, I can't be sure of anything. So, unofficially, I can't accept this result.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.