Posts from Comparing 3 with 4. Auto-translated

I suggest comparing all the pros and cons in this topic – that is, buildings, units, graphics, and so on.

In Heroes of Might and Magic III, the monsters are much more beautifully designed!
And the castles are also better drawn inside.

In Heroes 4, everything seems worse to me!
With the exception of the map editor (and its capabilities).
And the fact that you can fight as a hero.

In Heroes 3, the monsters look much better!
And the castles are also better designed inside.

I completely agree – the graphics are better.

I actually love the fourth game! And I love the third one too, but for me, it can't compete with the fourth. The editor is better, there's more tactical depth. A completely new style of gameplay emerged – it became more of an RPG. The bonuses for creatures are more noticeable. The list could go on...
IMHO

In my opinion, Heroes 3 is better than 4 in every way. :smile48: Especially since they messed everything up in 4. Have you ever seen griffins being associated with nature? And the faction names aren't great either; what are "Life, Death, Nature, Power," etc.? It seems the authors had no imagination at all. Here's a comparison:
3 4
Cities
+ -
Scenario (it seems like there isn't one in 4 at all)
+ -
Battles
+ + - (I liked them in the cities)

CONCLUSION: Why reinvent the wheel?:smile31:

P.S. But you can still play single battles:smile19: