Posts from [VOTE] Choosing a Guild Leader

Please refrain from posting comments here and only vote. Posts will only be made if someone wants to nominate themselves for the position of Guild Leader.
Currently, the list of candidates is as follows:
1) Xaker
2) ewgeniy
3) Archibald (Windows Vienna)
4) XEL
5) This spot could be yours

Candidates are allowed to leave messages with their platform. If someone has already written, such as Windows Vienna, please duplicate it here as well.

After some time, a vote will be held!

The program is very simple: 1 - We need a person who appears on the forum at least once a week and will update the list. 2 - We need a "wall of shame." 3 - We need a "committee" that will decide whether a candidate deserves a place on the wall of shame (this point needs the most work). 4 - We need to draw public attention to the wall of shame - otherwise, the whole point of the wall is lost. P.S. Hack, I understand that you are a much more deserving candidate, but I am simply curious about how this will all end. I removed all the links (I don't understand what this emulator loses from it; it's not a game, it's just a disk emulator... :confused: :confused:) That's all for now.

if I am elected, I will change a few things in the Guild:
1. It is necessary to exclude from the Guild those who do not comply with the charter (this point was not in the charter, but it should be).
2. The "wall of shame" should include not only people deserving a ban but also people who have committed less serious offenses (spammers, rude people, etc.).
3. A topic with a poll should be created for those who have committed particularly serious offenses: "ban or not ban!" where everyone can express their opinion.
4. No agitation like "ignore him" or "let's lower his reputation." All offenders are posted on the "wall of shame," and each person "decides for themselves" how to proceed.

If I am chosen, I will:
1. Try to reduce the pomposity. Yes, those who join the Guild should be united by friendship or, at least, friendly relations, but there is no need to use phrases that are almost like calls to "build a new world." All these "clan warfare has taken over the forum," "we have started to hate each other, so let's all hold hands," and so on, weigh heavily on those who pay attention to the Guild and sometimes even create the impression that the Guild is some kind of sect, rather than a club of people with shared interests, which it actually is.
2. No need to humiliate those on the "wall of shame." One can express general disapproval to the extent that depends on the seriousness of the offense. Or, ban them.
3. Whether to ban particularly egregious offenders or not is decided by the members of the Guild, but this cannot be done privately or via instant messaging.
4. Suppress any statements in topics related to the Guild, such as "forget this Guild," "do you really need it?" and so on. No one forces people who write such things to join the Guild; the Guild does not interfere with them, and they are not put on the "wall of shame" or banned for anything.
5. I will issue written warnings to those who are on the "wall of shame."
6. I will mercilessly suppress all members of the Guild who make anti-heroic statements (that is, speak negatively about the Might and Magic brand, excluding debates of the type "which part of Heroes/another game in the brand is better than the others" and so on). They will be put on the "wall of shame" as severely offending members and expelled from the Guild. If you don't like Heroes, then, pardon me, leave.

ADDED!!!!

I think that Magnus just wanted to show off his knowledge of Russian legislation with his quotes. What is the theme of the forum? If a member of the Guild starts to say anti-heroic things, he should be expelled from the Guild. Everything is quite logical. It is understandable if a member of the Guild comes here to chat or in off-topic sections, and joined the Guild simply because there are people there whom he respects. But if he doesn't like Heroes or another game in the Might and Magic brand, and especially if he openly states this, then he has no place in the Guild. By the way, the very name "Heroic International" implies that it is a club of people with shared interests - Heroes and people for whom Heroes are not pleasing; as I said, they have no place in the Guild.

Magnus. I understand what you wanted to achieve.
Archibald, I have also taken your comments into account.

Please do not violate the rules established in this section.
Believe me, the Guild of Independent Players (GIP) does not want to suppress anyone or impose its ideas...

And now, read carefully!!!!!!
XEL has proposed his vision for the GIP.
We have a democracy, so why do you think these rules will be in the GIP???
That's why different people offer their programs!

If you don't like the program written by XEL, then don't vote for him!!! It's that simple!!!!
But you immediately attacked!
Yes, of course, his program violates the laws of the Russian Federation, and we will ask him to correct it.

Measures have been taken.

If you have any thoughts, write to me in a private message or in this thread. But please don't say something like "I don't like the GIP and that's it..." Explain the reasons and other grounds for this judgment. However, it all depends on you.... Right now, we just have a list of candidates with their programs. If nothing suits you, then I will deal with it... with your consent.

You can be sure that I will never use the GIP as a means of mass terror. And nothing will be imposed on you...

Ta-da, ta-da...

Voting is open... and the poll offers a choice for several people. Let's say if you are willing to see both of them in the position...
And so that the others don't feel left out...

Against all for everyone who doesn't want to create a Guild.

So, let's vote! You can't vote for yourself!

LIST OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE ALREADY VOTED:
1) Archibald

The request here is not to post comments, but only to vote. Posts will only be made if someone wants to nominate themselves for the position of Head of the Guild.
COLOR]

I'm watching and amazed. You were asked not to post comments. You've started another argument, which can't even begin simply because the participants control themselves. Let's just vote in silence, and if someone wants to argue about this idea or someone's opinion on this topic, then create your own thread and do it there.
Then everyone gets upset: how is this possible?! And we've started a flame war here!" And they constantly start looking for the guilty ones. I suggest Xaker delete all unnecessary posts that are not related to the voting.

Sometimes you have to make a few concessions in the rules... otherwise, there will be even more outrage.

I'm sorry, but I don't quite understand what's going on. Why has the voting stopped? If it's finished, why hasn't the result been announced? It feels like everyone has just given up on the idea. We need to see it through to the end! If the voting shows that there will be a Guild, let's continue; if not, at least we'll know that such an organization won't be created.

It's not that it's difficult, everyone is just waiting for more participants to vote. But even now, we can say that the G.I. will definitely happen.

I think tomorrow I'll summarize the voting and announce the result... Basically, it's already clear...

Anyway, everything will be decided tomorrow, and now it's time to sleep...

Well... as I promised, the voting results for the Head of the Guild are in.
It's:smile03: :smile03: ewgeniy. :smile03: :smile03:
Now the entire Guild is at his disposal...
I think he'll be able to gather all the reasonable members of this forum and re-educate the rest so they don't cause conflicts, etc. In general, I wish him success in solving the social problems of the forum.
And we, those who have already signed up for the Guild, will all work together to help him with this!! )))
:)