Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from change the number of posts required to change level.
But in this interpretation, the significance of the post has actually diminished.
Yes, that's right, that's what I meant. :smile01:
Мугайс
Auto-translated
I don't really care about these rankings :D I've already forgotten what the creatures from Heroes look like – it's just nice to look at them.
Подмосковный рейнджер, не ведающий стаха
AmberSoler
Auto-translated
Heh... )) I didn't really think about it much either, but now I'll say that I like the silver Pegasus more than the dumb dendroid that I recently "earned"... )) Now I want a Pegasus again. Tell me, can I keep the Pegasus, can it always be mine? )) Raise the bar even higher so that it can never be reached! Or I won't post anything anymore!! ))
Here, I've added my two cents to the chatter... I even maintained the style... )))
In summary: Adults don't need toys, but if you consider them as a talisman, it's a pity to part with it... :) Especially if no one explains anything, turning us, *very self-respecting individuals*, into a herd... Do they want a revolution? They'll get a war! :smile19:
Well, you can still write about 500 more posts (which is half of what you've written today) without any problems)) Your Pegasus won't fly away from you)) and by the time you write these 500 posts, who knows, maybe they'll raise the bar again ;) so enjoy it while it lasts... :D
flood... flood... how much has merged in this sound for the heart of a forum user...
Кто состоянием своим доволен, тому жить весело. (с)Алекса́ндр Васи́льевич Суво́ров
Starhan
Auto-translated
and I probably forgot to upgrade the archer again.
BACKGROUND: General ZeT found an error in the existing ranking system, which was that his rank did not correspond to what it should have been according to the existing ranking system.
At first glance, it seems that the changes are large and there has been a shift of one level, but this is just an illusion, and if you look closer... using level 3 as an example: * Level 2 - >= 25 messages * Level 3 - >= 75 messages * Level 4 - >= 150 messages That is, to get level 3, you need to have more than 74 messages, but less than 150. [75 <= Level 3 < 150]
* Level 2 - < 75 messages * Level 3 - < 150 messages * Level 4 - < 250 messages That is, to get level 3, you need to have more than 75 messages, but less than 150 [75 < Level 3 < 150]
SUMMARY:
[75 <= 3 Level < 150] [75 < 3 Level < 150] The shift was not by one level, but by one message :)
Thank you very much, esteemed Creator, for explaining what's what. People were racking their brains and guessing about the reason for the changes to the ranking system. And yet, few listened to my words at the beginning of the thread.
:smile17:
Kyle
Auto-translated
Unfortunately, I didn't quite understand the explanation, but I still can't figure out how it shifted by one level.
If before, from 750 to 1000 experience points, it was level 8 (for example, I had an **Archmage**).
Now, from 750 to 1000 experience points, it's level 7 (a regular **Mage**).
I can't understand it: confused.
Sincerely.
Кто состоянием своим доволен, тому жить весело. (с)Алекса́ндр Васи́льевич Суво́ров
AmberSoler
Auto-translated
It's funny that a rather lengthy post from the Creator, intended to explain the inconsistency, actually explains nothing... :) What's the point of so many letters and numbers if the message doesn't answer the question: why? :)
I can only assume one thing: previously, the first level was reached after one post and was supposed to be maintained until 25. But in reality, after the second post, the player received the second level, after the 26th post - the third level, and so on. That's the only explanation that comes to mind. There isn't another.
Added 2 minutes later Kyle;119519
If previously, from 750 to 1000, it was level 8 (for example, I had an Archmage) Now, from 750 to 1000, it's level 7 (an ordinary Mage)
750-1000 is indeed the seventh level - if you look at the scheme. And if you go back (from bottom to top on the scheme), it becomes clear that one post gave you level 1, 2-25 gave you level 2, and so on. This is just an assumption, otherwise - I can't explain it... :)
BACKGROUND: General ZeT found an error in the existing rank system, which was that his rank did not correspond to what it should have been according to the existing rank system.
At first glance, it seems that the changes are large and there has been a shift of one level, but this is just an illusion, and if you look more closely... using level 3 as an example: * Level 2 - >= 25 posts * Level 3 - >= 75 posts * Level 4 - >= 150 posts That is, to get level 3, you need to have more than 74 posts, but less than 150. [75 <= Level 3 < 150]
* Level 2 - < 75 posts * Level 3 - < 150 posts * Level 4 - < 250 posts That is, to get level 3, you need to have more than 75 posts, but less than 150 [75 < Level 3 < 150]
SUMMARY:
[75 <= 3 level < 150] [75 < 3 level < 150] The shift was not by one level, but by one post :)
So, we can ask, why did you write this to us? Do you want us to delete all our posts and become level 3 and be happy about it? If this error was related to the initial levels, then why did you change all the ranks? Can you say why you did this? After all, this does not relate to the error you provided. Or do you have nothing to say about it? Why now do you need 5000 posts to get level 11, that's unrealistic, why are the people who got a new level losing it right away? What is the point of these levels if they are always devalued?
Ley
Auto-translated
Creator;119514
At first glance, it seems that the changes are significant and there's a shift of one level, but this is just an illusion, and if you look closer... using the 3rd level as an example: * Level 2 - >= 25 posts * Level 3 - >= 75 posts * Level 4 - >= 150 posts So, to reach level 3, you need to have more than 74 posts, but less than 150. [75 <= Level 3 < 150]
* Level 2 - < 75 posts * Level 3 - < 150 posts * Level 4 - < 250 posts So, to reach level 3, you need to have more than 75 posts, but less than 150 [75 < Level 3 < 150]
TOTAL:
[75 <= Level 3 < 150] [75 < Level 3 < 150] The shift wasn't by one level, but by one post :)
But I'm interested in another question: why was this particular example chosen for the explanation? Only in this example is there a division into ranks by 1 post. Let's take something else as an example, say, the 6th rank, and see: Before: * Level 5 - >= 250 posts * Level 6 - >= 500 posts * Level 7 - >= 750 posts So, to reach level 6, you need to have more than 250 posts, but less than 750. [250 <= Level 6 < 750]
Now: * Level 5 - < 500 posts * Level 6 - < 750 posts * Level 7 - < 1000 posts So, to reach level 6, you need to have more than 500 posts, but less than 1000 [500 < Level 6 < 1000]
And in this example, the difference is significant - 250 posts, but not 1. The approach to considering this situation can be different; I personally am an optimist, but is this rational?
"Единственное, что можно сказать с уверенностью об удаче - она изменит..."
ewgeniy
Auto-translated
I think you just have nothing else to do.... well, you moved it, so be it, here you are, a bunch of spammers:p:p:p I had this, I had that... it's time to close this thread:mad:
I think you just have nothing else to do.... So you moved it, and that's that, now you've all gathered here, you bunch of trolls :p:p:p I had it, I have it... it's time to close this topic :mad:
First of all, I'm interested in knowing why the Administration decided to reduce the number of posts required for a new level, and I definitely don't want to listen to your banal insults :p. And if you don't need this system, it's better to remove it completely instead of constantly postponing it. I don't understand what the point of this system is if it's constantly being changed. I'm already tired of being a Rakshasa Princess, and having to wait for another 2000 posts for a new creature. And when I reach the next level, as I am now, they'll increase it to 7000 posts, and I don't want to be stuck with one creature for the rest of my life. At least let the administration openly say so, instead of avoiding the answer. And they still haven't added a poll, I wrote a letter to the Admin and post #8 as well, but none of the moderators noticed, and neither did the Creator :mad:. This means that the Administration doesn't want to listen to the opinion of the people. After this statement, they will add a poll, but time has passed, and everyone is gradually starting to take a more moderate approach to the new system. If I'm wrong, and I hope I am, then the Administration will probably explain its position, and not just write me a warning or something like that
Some rank reductions occurred simply because, before the bug was fixed, ranks were calculated completely differently than described. If everyone had checked their previous rank against the current calculation table, they would have found that their rank was calculated incorrectly. But since many people learned about the existence of the page -> http://www.forum.heroesworld.ru/faq.php?faq=hw_help_system#faq_hw_help_system_rang, only after this topic appeared, and most people don't care about what ranks are and how they are calculated, the rank reduction became a deciding factor for those who participated in this topic. Yes, ranks did decrease after the bug was fixed, but after that, they began to correspond to the calculation table. Previously, ranks were calculated incorrectly and only partially corresponded to the table, which would have led to even greater discrepancies as more users progressed through the ladder that calculates what it should calculate, but not as described.
In other words, the previous paragraph:
before the bug fix: there was a rank calculation table, but ranks were calculated not in accordance with it (theoretical information about the rank system did not correspond to the practical implementation of the rank system)
after the bug fix: the rank calculation table has not changed much, but ranks are now calculated in full accordance with the table (theoretical information about the rank system now fully corresponds to the practical implementation of the rank system)
This is all well and good, but from this topic, I understand that many will be happy if the rank ladder is shifted down one level, which in turn will practically restore the ranks that users liked before the bug fix, but were calculated not in accordance with the calculation table.
Next, a new HeroesWorld rank calculation table, which now fully corresponds to its physical implementation.
Some rank reductions occurred simply because, before the bug was fixed, ranks were calculated completely differently than described. If everyone had checked their previous rank against the existing calculation table, they would have found that their rank was calculated incorrectly. But since many people learned about the existence of the page -> http://www.forum.heroesworld.ru/faq.php?faq=hw_help_system#faq_hw_help_system_rang, only after this topic appeared, and most people don't care about what ranks are and how they are calculated, the rank reduction became a deciding factor for those who participated in this topic. Yes, ranks did decrease after the bug was fixed, but after that, they began to correspond to the calculation table. Previously, ranks were calculated incorrectly and only partially corresponded to the table, which would have led to even greater discrepancies when an even larger number of users went through the ladder that calculates what it should calculate differently than it is described.
In other words, the previous paragraph:
before the bug was fixed: there was a rank calculation table, but the ranks were calculated not corresponding to it (theoretical information about the rank system did not correspond to the practical implementation of the rank system)
after the bug was fixed: the rank calculation table practically did not change, but the ranks began to be calculated fully corresponding to the table (theoretical information about the rank system fully began to correspond to the practical implementation of the rank system)
This is all good, but from this topic, I understood that many would be happy if the rank ladder was shifted down one level, which in turn would practically return the ranks that users liked before the bug was fixed, but were calculated not corresponding to the calculation table.
Next, a new HeroesWorld rank calculation table, which now fully corresponds to its physical implementation.
Thank you for understanding. It's great when the administration listens to the people, of course, it's a pity that a scandal has to be arranged for this, :( P.s. And I also don't like it when my font is intentionally reduced without an obvious reason, or rather, there is an obvious reason, it carries revolutionary ideas))) for example, in the previous post
Слоныш
HwKeeper
