Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Which unit in the Haven castle do you like the most (based on its appearance)?Auto-translated
I like the unupgraded griffin, archer, and monk. I don't like angels and archangels – in my opinion, the angel image from the 3rd part fits the game's atmosphere better.
Wow, I'm now a harpy.
А в таверне тихо плачет скрипка, Нервы успокаивая мне... И твоя раскосая улыбка В бархатном купается вине...
I like the Paladins; they are the most realistic guys in the whole Castle. Angels are only cool for the renegades. And their sword is terrible; it won't even fit in their hand, it would be uncomfortable for them to chop someone with it.
Step aside from the way of a better man than you So you fall at his feet hes the one who betrays you Its the servants devotion for the decay Stand up
I like the unupgraded griffin, archer, and monk. I don't like angels and archangels – in my opinion, the image of an angel from the 3rd part fits the game's atmosphere better.
Wow, I'm now a harpy.
I agree, the image of an angel/archangel is lost in Heroes 5; here, it's completely different, and the units themselves turned out poorly because Nival didn't do a good job with the monsters' faces; they are somewhat expressionless. For example, take the dancing with death; it creates a completely different impression there.
In Heroes 3, archangels are simply a classic; they look the same everywhere, but in Heroes 5, they have a different appearance, although I really like them, especially the upgraded version. Griffins are cute in their basic form, but the upgraded ones have a bucket on their heads, which ruins their appearance.
Those are pretty standard angels. As far as I understand, the image of angels in Heroes 3 is based on some biblical depiction. Why not come up with something new? They look quite impressive there, especially the fallen ones.
By the way, I think I can tell the difference between a boy and a girl, but I don't understand why you assumed they were women??? (by the way, as far as I know, in some versions, angels are genderless).
Step aside from the way of a better man than you So you fall at his feet hes the one who betrays you Its the servants devotion for the decay Stand up
The angels there are quite normal. As far as I understand, the image of angels in Heroes 3 is based on some biblical source. Why not come up with something new? They look quite impressive there, especially the fallen ones. By the way, I think I can tell the difference between a boy and a girl, but I don't understand why you think they are women??? (by the way, as far as I know, in some versions, angels are genderless).
Yes, I'm saying that the angels in Heroes 5 are better than in Heroes 3 because they are more unconventional. By the way, they are most likely women; the statue is clearly female, and it depicts an angel. So, in Heroes 5, they are not angels, but angelesses.
Those are normal angels. As far as I understand, the image of angels in Heroes 3 is based on some biblical depiction. Why not come up with something new? They look quite impressive there, especially the fallen ones. By the way, I can distinguish between a boy and a girl, but I don't understand why you think they are women??? (by the way, as far as I know, in some versions, angels are genderless.)
Because Nival said that they are women, and their faces don't look very masculine. In Heroes 3, the angels were well-designed. I'm not against introducing something new, but not something so radical. P.S. Now, these are not fallen angels, but seraphim in TotE.
Oh, even... Seraphim? It's almost funny... a bunch of angels, and they're all called Seraphim, is that it?))) I missed the information that they are women. But why not? In my opinion, they are drawn well, they don't contradict anything too much, let them be women. P.S. maybe tomorrow I will say the exact opposite, so don't get mad if anything.
Step aside from the way of a better man than you So you fall at his feet hes the one who betrays you Its the servants devotion for the decay Stand up
I was also skeptical at first... but most of the artwork for Heroes 5 features female characters... well, whatever. I still see them as angels, just like the others – dragons, dendroids, etc.
That’s exactly what I wanted to say, Arandor))) what difference does it make... you’re not going to go on dates with them, angels and angels... why bother if something is unclear.
Step aside from the way of a better man than you So you fall at his feet hes the one who betrays you Its the servants devotion for the decay Stand up
Masterdemilich
Arandor