Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Discussions, post-mortems, analysis, inflated egos, and all that jazz.
Basically, we discussed everything in detail with Dima in a private message, as much as we could. It seems like a storm in a teacup. Throughout my time as a moderator, I haven't banned anyone, nor have I ever issued violation points, and I've tried to avoid deleting messages altogether (I would put parts of the message in tags, while the text of the message remains fully preserved, fully accessible to its author, and in case of a moderator's mistake, it can be easily fully restored, and usually I would also explain in a private message why I did it). If someone had a different impression, perhaps it's a good reason to think about how they managed to create that impression? Dima Surmay
Wow, I'm very unpleasantly surprised that on our forum, you can't ask why a forum member was banned.
The question of why Antiplayer was banned was asked, and an answer to the question was given, and at the same time, "no bunny was harmed," and after that, to say that you can't ask? Well, that's quite a logic... But I still believe that in the regular sections, according to the forum rules, this is a violation; there is a special section for such questions, and at the very least, you should start with a private message. But I admit that I might have misunderstood the rules – I'm clarifying this point.Dima Surmay
Did Dirty appoint you as a moderator, or someone else?
He's doing fine. He'll be back in action in 5 days. For everyone else, let me clarify: if you write messages with profanity, replacing one letter with @, don't think that's okay. I will also punish you for that.
I don't use profanity on the forum, but I'm curious, what if you replace not just one letter in a swear word, but several? (example: instead of "bicycle" we write "velo...d").
I don't use profanity on the forum, but I'm curious, what if you replace not just one letter in a swear word, but several? (for example, instead of "bicycle" we write "velo...d").
At your own risk. People have simply found a loophole, changing one letter and thinking everything is okay. Well, we'll just have to educate them. :smile15: This is the second one.
Just saw how the server in the online lobby automatically censored a suggestion to play Jebus, even though it was written without the letter "J" :D. But the people from the Baltic states often refer to this meme in exactly that way, without any ulterior motive (I assume that in Latvian and Lithuanian, the letter J in this word is simply pronounced as "Y").
"There's no need to execute me,sir Davos . I'll be dead before dawn." ICQ 716748479
However, you are taking a risk, comrade. It has become unsafe on the forum; you can get in trouble for mentioning "the bus." :smile40:
I recently witnessed a five-year-old child telling another how he replaced a certain word with "pike," and used this to annoy the teachers at the kindergarten, but they couldn't do anything about it because it's a fish.
Although that word itself isn't a swear word, but rather the name for a female dog, so it's acceptable:rolleyes:
korovka1987, I saw on one website several years ago how a word filter automatically replaced the word "s_u_k_a" with "female mammal of the canine order". :) But, if we're going to be thorough, the word "female" can also be considered offensive to someone.
And the most absurd thing was that it wasn't just a single word, but the title of the movie "S_u_k_a-love," which the word filter censored.
Воскресайте, камінні душі, Розчиняйте серця і чоло, Щоб не сказали Про вас грядущі: їх на землі не було… (Василь Симоненко. Люди – прекрасні)
This is what happens when you let someone with a penchant for rambling take the lead. He's started discussions in the format of "an eccentric's fantasy." Come on, guys, don't be lazy, let your imaginations run wild; maybe the most daring fantasies will be brought to life :D
It's about me. It's even stated without any attempt to write on the given topic (discussion about favorites). It directly contradicts what I myself wrote in this same thread.
There is no other idea in the message, except for stirring up trouble.
I commented there about the controversial situation in the match between Dima Surmey and BoLo.
I'll write it here right away so as not to clutter up the "Favorites" thread. I also commented on this situation. But the problem is that in this case, the judges deliberately provided incomplete information, which initially misled me into believing that there was a violation of gaming ethics and pressure from the player BoLo, as well as a policy of double standards on the part of the judging. After talking directly with him, it became clear where, so to speak, the roots of this situation lie. Well, let's leave the incompleteness of the information provided to the conscience of the tournament judges.
Нам это идеально подойдёт! (с)
"Совесть - она либо есть, либо её нет" (с) RedWhait HP
I'm talking about a situation in the same match where the opponent of BoLo himself stopped the game earlier, demanding a review of the game situation, which was strange to demand in the first place. BoLo at least had grounds for his actions. So, overall, the opponent got what he asked for.
Нам это идеально подойдёт! (с)
"Совесть - она либо есть, либо её нет" (с) RedWhait HP
I'm talking about the situation in the same match, when the opponent of player BoLo stopped the game himself, demanding an investigation into the game situation, which was strange to demand in the first place.
Could you provide more details about that situation? Since the information about it has not been made public, it is possible that you drew a conclusion based on a one-sided view. And since the situation was not brought up for discussion and the game was continued, it means that nothing criminal was found there. And, after all, what specific data was intentionally hidden?
Since the situation wasn't brought up for discussion and the game continued, it means nothing criminal was found there.
There was certainly no criminal activity on BoLo's part. Otherwise, the game wouldn't have continued. What's strange is that the player who raised the complaint in a transparent game situation turned out to be a playing judge in the same tournament. Then, this same playing judge (who had previously tried to "smurf" in that game), suddenly portrayed himself as a victim of smurfing, posting incomplete information on the forum.
Нам это идеально подойдёт! (с)
"Совесть - она либо есть, либо её нет" (с) RedWhait HP
There was certainly no criminal intent on BoLo's part. Otherwise, the game wouldn't have continued. What's strange is that the player who made the claims in a transparent game situation turned out to be a playing judge in the same tournament. Then, this same playing judge (who had previously tried to "smurf" in that game) suddenly portrayed himself as a victim of smurfing, posting incomplete information on the forum.
So, the first time, Dima Surmay stopped the game, and the reasons weren't stated, which is equal to smurfing? Damn, all the judges and the administration are urging us to do only one thing: if an unclear situation occurs in the game, don't continue playing, save the game or exit and write to the judges, don't let the situation escalate to an unsolvable problem. Can a playing judge, considering an unclear situation only from his perspective as a player, understand it as well as a judge who reviews saves from both sides?
Grando
