Posts from HW tournament statistics analyzer. Auto-translated

Could you please provide more details? What are the two circles you're referring to, and where exactly is it "completely incorrect"?

2 rounds means 2 rounds, what else could it mean? That all games then go through a second round and everything is recalculated again, but already not with the initial rating numbers. Now they fixed it, and it seems there is no double duplication of all games anymore, at least at first glance.

Okay, maybe you looked at the middle column of the tournament ranking – which was initially uploaded with an error.
Are there any two rounds now, and are there any inconsistencies?

Perhaps you looked at the middle column of the tournament ranking – which was initially uploaded with an error.
Are there any two rounds now, and are there any inconsistencies?

I was looking at the regular general ranking, and the described error was there. It seems to have been fixed now, at least nothing obvious stands out.

Yes, thank you, LuckyF. The bug that caused games to duplicate was indeed added today. It has been fixed.
Now everything seems to be okay

I noticed that in the picture, I have 1869 points, but in the rating, it shows 1867. Where did the extra two points come from?

The image is updated once a day. The rating is calculated more frequently – currently, approximately every 45 minutes. The rating is calculated based on confirmed reports, and these reports may be confirmed much later than when they were submitted. This leads to the fact that someone's rating may change to reflect a state from six months ago, and from that moment, the rating of everyone is recalculated.

but I didn't have a rating of 1869, neither an hour ago, nor at any point before that.

so it was there. in the end, how can you claim that you never had 1869? you don't check the rating every hour, do you? do you even sleep sometimes?

and even if it was due to yesterday's "feature" with duplicated games, the images will be fixed automatically with the next update.

Since yesterday's update, my rating was definitely lower. As for verifying the statement "there has never been a rating of 1869," you can use the Ctrl+F key combination and search for "1869."

it seems you didn't understand this phrase:

the rating is calculated based on confirmed reports, and they are often confirmed much later than they were written. This leads to the fact that someone's rating changes based on a state that may be half a year ago, and from that moment on, the rating of everyone is recalculated.

someone confirmed an old report today - from that moment on, the personal rating histories of the two participants in this game have changed. Then, everyone they played with after that. Everyone who played with those they played with, and so on and so forth. If a very old report is confirmed, it will affect almost everyone. The rating history that the image was based on no longer exists; what ctrl f?

Now it's clear, let's wait until the image changes. Here, by the way, it has changed while I was figuring out the reason.

igromant redrew the picture for you without waiting in line (yes, he's very kind; he sits there and spends all day drawing pictures for everyone in between games, and you thought...).
You owe him a subscription to the online lobby for as long as he's your favorite.

what if he's a principled person – he might even be offended by the gift)

Added after 17 hours and 5 minutes

1. Finally, the starting games that were previously in "Excel spreadsheets" have been added.[/B]
Now, AlexTheGreat has reappeared in the overall top rankings.

Do I understand correctly that the Iroman rating should now be very similar to the Nitro rating up to a certain point in time? If not, please correct me.
In the Nitro ranking, joker2k has 1993 points, while in the Iroman ranking, joker2k has 2010 points. The difference is already visible in joker2k's first game against zloy_romantik in December 2014.
If you also look at the zloy_romantik ranking, you can see that it starts in February 2014, while the Nitro ranking only starts taking game results into account from September 2014.
Now the question is: are the starting games that were in the "Excel spreadsheets" games before the start of the Nitro ranking (i.e., before September 2014) or even earlier? Could it be that the introduction of initial data from the "Excel spreadsheets" already takes into account the results of games that are currently taken into account in the Iroman ranking up to September 2014?
P.s. I probably didn't write it very clearly, but I did my best.

Added after 3 minutes
Judging by the fact that the initial rating for zloy_romantik in the Nitro ranking in September and in the Iroman ranking in February is the same and equal to 1431, it is most likely the case.

Now, the question is: do the starting games that were in the "spreadsheets" refer to games before the Nitro rating began (i.e., before September 2014), or even earlier? Could it be that the initial data imported from the "spreadsheets" already includes the results of games that are currently accounted for in the Ihromant rating up to September 2014?
P.s. I probably didn't explain it very clearly, but I did my best.
Judging by the fact that Zloy_romantik's initial rating in the Nitro rating in September and Ihromant's in February are the same and equal to 1431, it is most likely the case.

A very meticulous analysis of the point calculation for 2014. Now, we need an equally meticulous solution to this problem, kamukag3e!! )