Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Discussions, post-mortems, analysis, inflated egos, and all that jazz.
Although herolwy was playing against rebellious, the representative from the Celestial Empire showed that he knows the rules very well and applies them in practice. So it can be assumed that Herolwy simply "plays the fool" when it suits him. In a similar situation (when I failed to break through the guard of the Griffin Conservatory), I apologized to Hosenk and confirmed his victory report in the OFB without question. I believe that YaR is free to write a victory report for this game, especially since it is a tournament game.herolwy
{[21:09] rebellious:} my sawmill blocked - packcavaliers - and nothing woods near {[21:10] herolwy:} must tech re? {[21:10] rebellious:} yes {[21:10] herolwy:} give me password {[21:10] rebellious:} 8545 {[21:12] herolwy:} i think u cant tech-re {[21:13] herolwy:} u can pass all road {[21:13] herolwy:} just have no wood
lwy hero (18.10.2018 21:14): u loser,i report,if u dont agree,give save to judge
In this situation, pretending to be clueless won't work. Violating the rules equals a technical loss. Whether you're Chinese or Japanese, it doesn't matter! :D
And this will be a lesson for the others – check your save files after the game.
I didn't realize we had double standards on the forum. I apologize for the clip from an unfinished game. And I advise the gentlemen to watch their words.
I didn't realize we had double standards on the forum. I apologize for the clip from an unfinished game. And I would advise the gentlemen to watch their words.
Should I start issuing ration cards to you? This is called spoiling a game. I personally have a clear attitude towards spoilers.
Нам это идеально подойдёт! (с)
"Совесть - она либо есть, либо её нет" (с) RedWhait HP
So, are you going to start issuing ration cards? This is called spoiling the game. I personally have a very clear opinion about spoilers.
Wyndoc clearly spoiled it because he didn't think in time, not intentionally, and he apologized for it. He deserves disapproval, but insults are inappropriate here.
Everything is fine with him. He will be back in action in 5 days.
For everyone else, let me clarify: if you write messages containing profanity, replacing one letter with an "@", don't think that this is acceptable. I will also punish you for that.
By the way, I think I posted the message in the "tribune" thread, but it ended up in this thread. And now I see that some people have the "tribune" topic in their message, while others have "Discussions...", and some have a different topic altogether. Why is that?
Because I (as a moderator) considered that your message was not suitable for the "Tribuna" topic. In fact, according to the forum rules, discussing the actions of moderators is generally prohibited (point 18), and your question was only suitable for a private message, and strictly speaking, it should have been deleted and you should have been given penalty points. But in order not to simply delete everything that formally violates the forum rules, but at the same time contains some tangible meaning, this topic was created as a kind of "Preserve," where, if possible, any issues can be further discussed, including those on the verge of what is formally permissible, without cluttering up all the topics on the forum, where people write whatever comes to their mind, forgetting (or not even thinking) about what the topic is about and where they are posting. And off-topic messages from other forum topics end up here, and if you wish, you can sometimes even trace the history.
In a philosophical sense, this is a kind of compromise between the rigidity of the rules, which are necessary for structuring information and protecting against chaos, but are not ideal (and the forces to improve them are not infinite), and the fluidity of life, which constantly finds new ways to show that the rules are imperfect.
Because I considered that your message was not suitable for the Tribune topic. In fact, according to the forum rules, discussing the actions of moderators is generally prohibited (point 18), and your question was only suitable for a private message, and strictly speaking, it should have been deleted and you should have received penalty points. But in order not to delete everything that formally violates the forum rules, this topic was created as a kind of preserve, where it is possible to discuss any issues on the verge of formally permissible, without cluttering up all the topics on the forum, where anyone who has something to write, writes it.
Wow, I am very unpleasantly surprised that it is not allowed to ask why a forum participant was banned on our forum. Were you appointed as a moderator by Dirty, or someone else?
=Lizard=
