New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
Nice! Want a quick tour of this page too?
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
korovka1987
http://www.heroesworld.ru/rating/?player=28330
I don't quite understand, did the HW rating start working in parallel with Ihromant's work? With the implemented filters, etc.?
If so, you could have informed him; he is, after all, spending his time on it.
But it's still unclear which of the ratings is better.
Each has its own advantages and disadvantages. And for now, neither is optimal and needs further refinement.
korovka1987
The Ihromanta rating is better, at least because it shows how many points are added or subtracted as a result of the game. This outweighs all the advantages of filters and other features of the Creator rating. (imo)
If so, you could have informed him; after all, he's spending his time on this.
Nodl
To whom? The player or the creator?
And the main question is - why? Both rankings are not yet complete, and therefore neither one definitively cancels out the other.
Ihromant
More like a Gameman, I assume he didn't know about the HW rating reincarnation when he started making his.
Why? At least two adults are doing practically identical unpaid work. It's not very rational.
Nodl
As Al Feyn already mentioned, I started doing this because the Nitro website was down, and the built-in ranking hadn't been updated for several months. I enjoy doing it, and no one is forcing me. I'm always working on some pet projects, but most of them end up in the trash (because nobody needs them), but here there's an opportunity to create something that will be useful to someone, and that's what motivates me.
I've created tables with the current and previous seasons. Also, I made some minor corrections to the list of unconfirmed players.
That's cool, I'm currently 4th in the current season, I'm such a hardcore player.
Ihromant
already fixed
This rating doesn't include 5 of my games played consecutively between November 19th and 28th, 2017, namely:
1) /topic/at/1051564/
2) /topic/at/1052349/
3) /topic/at/1053448/
4) /topic/at/1053722/
5) /topic/at/1054116/
korovka1987
Meo
P.S. I would like to see a link to the rating, at least in the header of this topic, because it's getting difficult to find it:smile50:
Russel_lDHl
Ihromant
Yes, now everything is in its place :smile54:
The difference in points (12 points) is also present, but I think it's not critical. The main thing is that all the reports are being recorded.
And what initial data to use is a different question. And it won't be difficult to fix this with a complete list.
P.S. I would like to see a link to the rating at least in the header of this topic, because it's already getting difficult to find it :smile50:
It would be better to have a link that you can click on in the signature, like it was before.
By the way, I have a suggestion to use all the monsters in the banners, not just the peasant, gargoyle, griffin, pegasus, bird, archer, and azure dragon. The question is, how to distribute them - depending on the place in the rating, or tie them to certain rating levels?
It seems to me that there was a clear analogy here with the rating and the monster displayed after winning a scenario. There were more creatures there, but the monster depended on the points scored.
And initially, this was also the case in ToH, I think the old-timers would find it amusing to see the symbolism and the division into barons, lords, and emperors :)
