I would be perfectly happy with a promise to behave well – to play all scheduled games within the rules and not start any arguments.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
I would be perfectly happy with a promise to behave well – to play all scheduled games within the rules and not start any arguments.
And if there is a mutual agreement between the players, demanding total submission is unnecessary.
7) Players have the right, by mutual agreement, to make any changes to the rules, with the exception of choosing starting castles and heroes.
So, what was the reason he was not allowed to participate?
Were there ever complaints about him not following tournament rules, refusing to play a pre-defined map?
you could accept the application, and due to the violation of the rules, you could exclude the player (and write to them before the tournament, because for me, "excluded" is not a good approach)... there is logic in this, but unfortunately, not in what you are doing!
Yes, that's what I think; he would have had a responsibility to the people, but as it is, you have a "special opinion" (there's a movie about that). Accusing someone before they've even made a mistake. And if he had "ruined" the tournament, people would have formed their own opinion, and there wouldn't have been any questions directed at you. But now, you've messed things up.